Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Harsh Mann v. Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd & Ors

06 Aug 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:5808

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation from Rs. 33.7 lakh to Rs. 52 lakh for a motor accident victim rendered permanently vegetative, awarding additional amounts for attendant care, future medical expenses, and non-pecuniary losses.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation enhancement permanent disability functional disability

Amit Arora v. Commissioner of Excise

06 Aug 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:6153

The Delhi High Court quashed the attachment of a petitioner’s property wrongly identified as LLP’s asset, holding that LLP liabilities do not extend to non-partner’s private property without due process.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Limited Liability Partnership Act Delhi Excise Act attachment of property recovery certificate

Puran Prasad v. State of NCT of Delhi

06 Aug 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6151

The Delhi High Court held that a prisoner’s failure to surrender after emergency parole constitutes violation of conditional release, justifying denial of parole period counting towards sentence and upholding the punishment ticket.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant emergency parole Delhi Prison Rules 2018 conditional release failure to surrender

Shubham Jain and Ors. v. Maryam Bee and Anr.

06 Aug 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:5846-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim relief order in a suit for specific performance, affirming the Court's discretion to impose a deposit condition to ensure the plaintiff's readiness and willingness to perform the contract.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance interim relief Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC deposit condition

M/S Deutsche Lufthansa AG v. Nayan Pahwa & Ors.

06 Aug 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:6001

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Tribunal's award reinstating fixed term employees terminated during pendency of an industrial dispute without prior permission, holding such termination illegal under Sections 33 and 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 Section 33A fixed term employment

Shivam Singh@ Nanhe v. State of NCT of Delhi

06 Aug 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6041

The Delhi High Court granted parole to a life convict to engage counsel and file a Special Leave Petition, emphasizing the constitutional right to counsel of choice despite recent prison punishments.

criminal petition_allowed Significant parole Delhi Prison Rules 2018 Section 302 IPC Article 22(1) Constitution

Ghanshyam @ Javed v. State (NCT of Delhi)

06 Aug 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6040

The Delhi High Court quashed three major punishment orders against a life convict for non-compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards and lack of evidence under the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Delhi Prison Rules 2018 Punishment Ticket Show-cause notice Procedural fairness

Riddhi Siddhi Associates v. National Highways Authority of India & Ors.

06 Aug 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:6032

The Delhi High Court upheld the debarment and penalty imposed on a toll collection contractor for employee misconduct, affirming the inherent power to blacklist subject to natural justice and proportionality.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant debarment blacklisting natural justice principles of fairness

A R SALES PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

06 Aug 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:6034

The Delhi High Court quashed DGFT’s order requiring SCOMET authorization for export of civil aircraft parts certified for civilian use, holding that such goods do not attract export restrictions under the Foreign Trade Policy, 2023.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Foreign Trade Policy 2023 SCOMET list Catch-all provisions Export control

Rajiv Jain v. Union of India and Ors.

06 Aug 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:6033

The Delhi High Court held that Lookout Circulars restricting the right to travel abroad cannot be issued merely on bank loan defaults without cognizable offences or reasonable belief of detriment to India's economic interests, quashing such LOCs issued at banks' instance.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Lookout Circular Fundamental Right Article 21 Travel Abroad

Surya Chetan Aviation Handling Services & Ors. v. Airports Authority of India & Anr.

06 Aug 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:6031

Delhi High Court upheld the Airport Authority of India's three-year debarment of aviation service bidders for violating tender conditions and submitting false affidavits, affirming limited judicial interference in administrative tender decisions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Request for Proposal Clause 2.2.1(f) fraudulent practice corrupt practice

M/S HFCL LTD. v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council

06 Aug 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:5978
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the Facilitation Council and arbitral tribunal lacked jurisdiction under the MSMED Act as the respondent was not registered at contract execution, allowing the writ petition to quash the arbitration reference.

civil petition_allowed Significant MSMED Act jurisdiction registration date writ petition maintainability arbitration reference

Hani Khatoon v. Union of India & Ors.

06 Aug 2024 · MANMOHAN, ACJ; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. · 2024:DHC:5938-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Railway Board's zone-wise calculation of Covid-19 related contract extension periods for catering licences, holding such policy decisions are not amenable to judicial interference.

administrative appeal_dismissed dies non period catering licence Covid-19 pandemic judicial review

RADHA PHOOL FIN-INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD. v. PARAMSUKH NIRMAN PVT. LTD.

06 Aug 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:5816

The Delhi High Court held that while the 120-day period for filing a written statement with affidavit of admission/denial is mandatory, a written statement filed within time but without the affidavit can be taken on record if the defect is cured within the prescribed period.

civil appeal_allowed Significant written statement affidavit of admission/denial 120 days defect removal

Gangadhar Choudhary v. Avdesh Chand Gupta & Ors.

06 Aug 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:5838

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of substitution application relying on a Will, affirmed the requirement to notify legal heirs under Hindu Succession Act, and condoned delay in filing appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXII Rule 3 CPC substitution of legal representatives Hindu Succession Act 1956 Section 15(1)(d)

BP Vashist v. UOI and Ors.

06 Aug 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:5817-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an in-situ promotion granted to a similarly placed officer, holding that such personal promotions based on administrative considerations are not arbitrary and that the petitioner’s claim post-retirement lacked merit.

administrative petition_dismissed in-situ promotion personal measure discrimination seniority

Kamal Garg v. South Indian Bank Ltd

06 Aug 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:5896

The Delhi High Court held that a Magistrate's role under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act is ministerial and cannot entertain Section 340 CrPC applications, quashing the stay on possession of mortgaged property.

civil petition_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act, 2002 Section 14 SARFAESI Act Section 340 CrPC Section 195 CrPC

Index Hospitality Limited v. Contitel Hotels and Resorts Pvt Ltd & Ors.

06 Aug 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:5897

The Delhi High Court held that contempt proceedings cannot be invoked for enforcement of final arbitral awards or settlements where alternate statutory remedies under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are available, and dismissed the contempt petition accordingly.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Enforcement of arbitral award Section 17(2) Arbitration Act

Employees State Insurance Corporation v. ESIC Medical Officers Association

06 Aug 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:5925-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT’s order quashing ESIC’s circular restricting telephone reimbursement, directing ESIC to follow the Ministry of Finance’s 2018 memorandum and reimburse medical officers retrospectively with interest.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Employees’ State Insurance Corporation telephone reimbursement Section 17(2) ESIC Act Ministry of Finance Office Memorandum 26.03.2018

Aakash Educational Services Ltd v. M/S VAG Educational Services & Ors.

06 Aug 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5907

The Delhi High Court appointed a substitute arbitrator to continue arbitration proceedings after the death of the original arbitrator, allowing the arbitration to proceed without prejudice to the parties' rights.

civil other substitute arbitrator arbitration proceedings death of arbitrator appointment by court