Delhi High Court
76,521 judgments
Bharat Abhilash v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a gang rape case under the POCSO Act, holding that the gravity of allegations and ongoing trial outweigh grounds of delay or parity with co-accused.
Shri Jeet Ram Smarak Institute of Engineering and Technology v. All India Council for Technical Education
The Delhi High Court set aside AICTE's denial of approval to technical institutions for non-compliance with prescribed procedural safeguards and remanded the matter for fresh consideration following the mandated procedure.
Elekta Medical Systems Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences
The Delhi High Court terminated the mandate of the existing arbitrator under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and appointed a substitute arbitrator in line with Supreme Court precedents to ensure impartial arbitration.
SACHEEROME ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES v. NEC TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appointment of a substituted arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing continuation of arbitration proceedings from the stage they were left after the original arbitrator's death.
Lalit v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a murder and abduction case, holding that serious allegations supported by disclosure statements and corroborative evidence do not warrant bail at the investigation stage.
DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD. v. PARHIT DIAGNOSTIC PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral appointment of an arbitrator is impermissible and appointed an independent sole arbitrator where the petitioner had validly invoked arbitration and respondents had due notice and participated in proceedings.
Manju Jain v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte municipal assessment order due to procedural irregularities and lack of fair hearing, remanding the matter for fresh assessment after proper opportunity.
National Highways Authority of India v. AFCONS-APIL (JOINT VENTURE)
The Delhi High Court dismissed a commercial petition as withdrawn following settlement between National Highways Authority of India and Afcons-APIL Joint Venture.
Union of India v. Naresh Kumar Gupta & Co Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that Supreme Court's COVID-19 limitation extension orders apply to petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, allowing a delayed petition to be heard on merits despite statutory limitation.
Sujeev Gandhi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Assessing Officer to verify and grant TDS credit by deciding rectification applications within twelve weeks, emphasizing the statutory duty to protect taxpayers from denial of TDS credit due to deductor errors.
Cloudtail India Private Limited v. The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of a Nil withholding tax certificate application under Section 197(1) of the Income Tax Act and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with procedural compliance.
Faqir Chand v. National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the income tax assessment order for violation of natural justice as the petitioner was denied a reasonable opportunity to file a reply due to portal malfunction and lack of notice to the legal heir.
Billo @ Bilkish v. State, NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a dowry death case, holding that custodial interrogation was unnecessary due to insufficient material against her.
NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Limited v. Symphony Vyapar Private Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award dismissing NTPC's claim for liquidated damages against Symphony, affirming the limited scope of judicial review over factual findings in arbitration.
Greenlam Industries Limited v. The Advertising Standards Council of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of the suit by Greenlam Industries Limited against ASCI as the cause of action ceased to exist following CCPA's orders directing modification of the advertisement.
M/S Singh Associates v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of an independent arbitrator, holding that the arbitration clause exists and is valid despite a 'No Claim Certificate' and Supplementary Agreement, and that the court's role at the Section 11 stage is limited to prima facie examination of the arbitration agreement.
Pradeep Kumar Aggarwal v. Anoop Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator as directed by the Supreme Court and refused to allow a party who voluntarily joined arbitration proceedings to withdraw at this stage.
Baljeet Ram v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking direction to issue an admit card for an exam due to the petitioner's failure to comply with procedural requirements and timely approach to the appropriate forum.
Parveen Kumar Gupta v. Ravi Chadha & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that while suits for trade mark infringement must be stayed under Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act during rectification proceedings, claims for passing off can continue, and condoned delay in filing a Review Petition accordingly.
Nandita Sengupta & Ors. v. Seema Dasgupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim reliefs over terrace usage rights, holding that exclusive ownership lies with Respondent No. 1 based on title documents and that the dispute is to be resolved by arbitration.