Lemon Tree Hotels Limited v. National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 18 Aug 2021 · 2021:DHC:2532-DB
Manmohan; Navin Chawla
W.P.(C) 5427/2021
2021:DHC:2532-DB
tax appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court set aside a faceless income tax assessment order for failure to grant a mandatory personal hearing and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 5427/2021
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 5427/2021 & CM APPL. 16831/2021
LEMON TREE HOTELS LIMITED ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate with Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal and
Ms. Manisha Sharma, Advocates.
VERSUS
NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE DELHI (EARLIER NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE DELHI) &
ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate with Mr. Shailendra Singh and
Mr. Udit Sharma, Advocates.
Date of Decision: 18th August, 2021
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
JUDGMENT
MANMOHAN, J

1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.: (Oral)

2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned assessment order, notice of demand and notice for initiation of penalty proceedings dated 22nd April 2021, issued under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B, Section 156 and Section 274 read with Section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] for the assessment year [AY] 2018-2019. 2021:DHC:2532-DB

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the impugned Assessment order has been passed in breach of the principles of natural justice. He states that since the matter was complex in terms of facts and law, a request for personal hearing was made to respondent No. l, via its designated e-portal, on 27th

4. He contends that Respondent no. l had an obligation to grant a personal hearing to the petitioner in terms of Section 144B(7)(vii) of the Act and since personal hearing was sought and was not granted by respondent no. l before passing the impugned assessment order, the same is contrary to law. March 2021.

5. Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, learned counsel for the respondents, states that the respondents have no objection if this Court were to set aside the impugned order and remand back the matter to the Assessing Officer for passing a fresh order after following the due procedure.

6. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the impugned assessment order, notice of demand and notice for initiation of penalty proceedings dated 22nd April 2021, issued under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B, Section 156 and Section 274 read with Section 270A of the Act for the assessment year [AY] 2018-2019 are set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Assessing Officer who shall grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and thereafter pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition and pending application stand disposed of.

7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail MANMOHAN, J NAVIN CHAWLA, J AUGUST 18, 2021 TS