Delhi High Court

75,670 judgments

Year:

Rail Vikas Nigam Limited v. Simplex Infrastructures Limited

29 Sep 2021 · Vibhu Bahkru · 2021:DHC:3096

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that fabrication work was not included in the contract's BOQ item, dismissing the petition challenging the award for patent illegality and violation of natural justice.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Bill of Quantities fabrication work

M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

28 Sep 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:3072

The Delhi High Court directed the Government to urgently fill vacancies and consider increasing staff strength at the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA to ensure efficient adjudication of cases, while adjourning substantive petitions on freezing of bank accounts.

administrative other Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Adjudicating Authority vacancies staff shortage

Ashok Kumar v. Hotel Zodiac Pvt Ltd; Rajender Gauba v. Hotel Zodiac Pvt Ltd

28 Sep 2021 · Amit Bansal · 2021:DHC:3086

The Delhi High Court allowed filing of relevant documents with the rejoinder in eviction proceedings when supported by pleadings in the leave to defend application and denied by the respondent, setting aside the ARC's order rejecting such documents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant leave to defend application rejoinder filing documents Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

M/S UNIVERSAL DESIGN BUILD v. DEALSKART ONLINE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED

28 Sep 2021 · Sanjeev Narula · 2021:DHC:3087

The Delhi High Court held that a contract clause ambiguously referring to arbitration did not constitute a valid arbitration agreement, and dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement Section 7 Arbitration Act Section 11(6) Arbitration Act jurisdiction clause

M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

28 Sep 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:3067

The Delhi High Court directed the Government to urgently fill prolonged vacancies in the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA to ensure its efficient functioning and proper adjudication of pending cases.

administrative other Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Adjudicating Authority vacancies manpower shortage

Delhi Parshashan Vikas Vibhag Industrial Employees Union v. Chief Electoral Officer & Anr.

28 Sep 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2021:DHC:3088-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the union's appeal directing maintenance of status quo on engagement of its members during conciliation proceedings under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, pending resolution of the industrial dispute.

labor appeal_allowed Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 conciliation proceedings status quo

Vikesh Majithia & Anr. v. Smt. Asha Rani

28 Sep 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2021:DHC:3089-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal against refusal of injunction in a suit for specific performance, directing expedited trial and mediation while allowing leave to amend the plaint.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural specific performance collaboration agreement injunction amendment of plaint

TDI Infratech Ltd. & Ors. v. Nirupama Marwaha & Anr.

28 Sep 2021 · Asha Menon · 2021:DHC:3063

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the NCDRC's refusal to waive deposit of awarded amount as condition for stay, holding that supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is limited and no jurisdictional error was made.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India Consumer Protection Act 1986 NCDRC SCDRC

DR.REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED v. WEST-COAST PHARMACEUTICAL WORKS LTD.

28 Sep 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:3084
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit based on the defendant's undertaking to cease use of a deceptively similar mark and imposed token costs payable to a Covid relief fund.

civil appeal_allowed trademark infringement registered trademark deceptively similar mark undertaking

M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

28 Sep 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:3069

The Delhi High Court directed the Government to urgently fill vacancies and consider increasing staff strength in the PMLA Adjudicating Authority to ensure its efficient functioning while hearing writ petitions challenging ED actions.

administrative other Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Adjudicating Authority vacancies staff shortage

M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

28 Sep 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:3070

The Delhi High Court directed the Government to urgently fill prolonged vacancies in the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA to ensure its efficient functioning and timely adjudication of cases.

administrative other Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Adjudicating Authority vacancies staff shortage

M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

28 Sep 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:3073

The Delhi High Court directed the Government to urgently fill vacancies and consider increasing manpower in the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA to ensure its effective functioning amid petitions challenging freezing of bank accounts.

administrative other Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Adjudicating Authority vacancies staff shortage

M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

28 Sep 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:3077

The Delhi High Court directed the Government to promptly fill vacancies at the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA to ensure its efficient functioning and ordered continued judicial oversight of related writ petitions.

administrative other Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Adjudicating Authority vacancies staffing

M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

28 Sep 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:3080

The Delhi High Court directed the Government to promptly fill vacancies and augment staff strength in the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA to ensure efficient and timely adjudication of cases.

administrative other Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Adjudicating Authority vacancies staff shortage

M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

28 Sep 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:3081

The Delhi High Court directed the Government to urgently fill vacancies and consider increasing manpower in the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA to ensure efficient adjudication of cases.

administrative other Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Adjudicating Authority vacancies manpower shortage

Alok Ranjan v. National Medical Commission

28 Sep 2021 · Chief Justice D. N. Patel; Amit Bansal · 2021:DHC:3064-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the MCI regulations and disability certificate, holding that the petitioner with right upper limb deformity is ineligible for MBBS admission under the PwD quota and cannot be admitted after the cut-off date.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Graduate Medical Education Regulations Persons with Disability quota Medical admission eligibility Disability certificate

M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

28 Sep 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:3078

Delhi High Court directs the Government to urgently fill vacancies and enhance staffing in the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA to ensure efficient functioning and timely adjudication.

administrative other Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Adjudicating Authority vacancies staffing

M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

28 Sep 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:3079

The Delhi High Court directed the Government to promptly fill vacancies and increase manpower at the PMLA Adjudicating Authority to ensure its efficient functioning amid pending writ petitions challenging ED actions.

administrative other Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Adjudicating Authority vacancies staff shortage

Neelam v. Chandra Rekha Malik & Anr.

28 Sep 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:3085

The Delhi High Court disposed of a partition suit on the basis of a voluntary settlement between the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, confirming the division of property shares and sale to a third party.

civil appeal_allowed Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC compromise settlement disposal of suit

Kapil Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi

28 Sep 2021 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2021:DHC:3090
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an FIR under Section 376 IPC cannot be quashed on the basis of a compromise or settlement between the parties, emphasizing the serious societal impact of rape offences.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 376 IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence