Delhi High Court

34,828 judgments

Year:

Dr Prasuna Chiluka v. National Board of Examinations & Anr.

25 Nov 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:4130
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Delhi High Court quashed NBEMS’s cancellation of a doctor’s DrNB candidature for excess leave, holding that cancellation must be based on grounds stated in the order and that FAQs cannot impose binding liabilities beyond the Leave Rules.

administrative petition_allowed Significant DrNB candidature cancellation unauthorized absence leave rules FAQs binding nature

M/S GARG ENTERPRISES v. UNION OF INDIA

19 Nov 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:7129
Cites 1 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to refer disputes under a railway contract to arbitration, emphasizing a pragmatic approach over procedural technicalities and rejecting the respondent’s plea of accord and satisfaction as a merits issue.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 notice General Conditions of Contract

Rahul Kumar Upadhyay v. National Board of Examination

11 Nov 2019 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2021:DHC:3881
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a PwD candidate under horizontal reservation must meet fixed qualifying marks without relaxation unless exceptional circumstances exist, dismissing the petition challenging cut-off marks and reservation application.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Persons with Disabilities horizontal reservation vertical reservation cut-off marks

Nilkanth Das v. CBSE

08 Nov 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:94
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking correction of CBSE internal assessment marks, holding that CBSE Circulars prohibit any post-upload revision of marks, thereby upholding the finality of declared examination results.

administrative petition_dismissed CBSE internal assessment marks correction of marks finality of examination results CBSE Circulars

X v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

07 Nov 2019 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:1141
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court set aside bail granted without serving notice and hearing the victim under the SC & ST Act, emphasizing mandatory compliance with victim's rights in bail proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant SC & ST Act Section 15A(3) Section 15A(5) bail

Atma Ram Properties Pvt. Ltd v. The Post Office

05 Nov 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1754
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court must appoint an arbitrator upon a valid arbitration agreement without examining the merits of the dispute.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) arbitration agreement appointment of arbitrator

Sangeeta v. Neetu

30 Oct 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · (2022) 291 DLT 697
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that a suit for injunction arising out of a marital relationship falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Family Court and ordered transfer of the suit accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 7(1)(d) jurisdiction marital relationship

Dal Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

04 Oct 2019 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7971-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Delhi High Court held that Inspectors who attained grade pay ₹ 4800/- via ACP are entitled to non-functional upgradation to ₹ 5400/- after four years, overruling restrictive executive circulars.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme grade pay non-functional upgradation Central Excise Inspectors

Hindustan Cleanenergy Ltd. v. MAIF Investments India 2 PTE Ltd. & Ors.

30 Sep 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:303
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, holding that failure to obtain marketable title within stipulated timelines constituted contractual default entitling respondents to enforce securities pending arbitration.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Framework Agreement marketable title Kindle Pledge

Vineet Goel v. Rushmi Goel

25 Sep 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2277

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of belated filing of certified bank statements, holding that failure to comply with court-ordered timelines without reasonable justification disentitles the petitioner from placing such documents on record.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India Section 151 CPC condonation of delay certified copies

Shri Salek Chand Jain v. SH Vijay Kumar Dev & Ors.

25 Sep 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:1020

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against municipal authorities for alleged non-compliance with directions on controlling stray animals, holding that substantial compliance negates wilful disobedience.

administrative petition_dismissed contempt petition stray cattle stray dogs monkeys

Gaurav Miglani et al. v. Imagine Marketing Pvt Ltd

14 Sep 2019 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:8075-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction against Exotic Mile's use of marks deceptively similar to Imagine Marketing's 'boAt' trademarks but set aside the injunction against an unprayed-for tagline, allowing use of a new mark 'GOBOULT' pending separate challenge.

civil appeal_allowed Significant passing off interim injunction trademark infringement deceptive similarity

Ajay Kumar Sharma v. Commissioner, South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr

13 Sep 2019 · C. Hari Shankar; Amit Sharma
Cites 4 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court upheld compulsory retirement orders under FR 56(j) and Rule 48 of CCS Pension Rules against two municipal officers, affirming limited judicial interference in administrative decisions based on doubtful integrity and public interest.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant compulsory retirement Fundamental Rule 56(j) Rule 48 CCS Pension Rules public interest

Sopariwala Exports & Ors. v. Akhil Kumar Kachhara Trading as Ali Impex & Anr.

12 Sep 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:8477
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages for trademark infringement, permitted destruction of seized infringing goods, and ordered release of bank guarantee upon compliance.

civil appeal_allowed trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction damages

The Indian School v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

11 Sep 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:214

The Delhi High Court allowed the respondents to adjudicate a show cause notice but restrained enforcement of any adverse order against the petitioner pending further orders, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

administrative petition_allowed show cause notice interim protection adjudication writ petition

Amour Banquets Private Limited v. Oyo Hotels and Homes Private Limited and Another

10 Sep 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5767
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to refer disputes arising from a Management Services Agreement to arbitration, leaving limitation and other issues to be decided by the arbitral tribunal.

arbitration appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Management Services Agreement Arbitration clause

Inter University Accelerator Centre v. Manisha Rani & Ors.

03 Sep 2019 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Sanjeev Narula · 2023:DHC:5497-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the promotion of an eligible employee to Personal Assistant with retrospective effect, rejecting the promotion of a non-feeder cadre employee and affirming strict adherence to Recruitment Rules.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant promotion feeder cadre Recruitment Rules Personal Assistant

DAV Model School v. Directorate of Education

29 Aug 2019 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:593-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that a litigant is bound by unchallenged concessions made before the Court and directed the appellant school to pay the respondent her MACP benefits with interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme MACP benefits concession before court finality of order

Vinay Kumar Jain v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office

28 Aug 2019 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:2673
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court granted bail to a statutory auditor accused under Section 447 of the Companies Act, balancing statutory bail restrictions with constitutional rights and parity with co-accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Companies Act 2013 Section 447 Section 212(6)

Ghanshyam Das Gupta v. Union of India, SFIO

28 Aug 2019 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:2674
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a statutory auditor accused under Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013, emphasizing compliance with auditing standards, absence of specific fraud allegations, and parity with co-accused granted bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Companies Act 2013 Section 447 Section 212(6)