Delhi High Court
75,670 judgments
BT (India) Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging tax proceedings under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, holding that jurisdiction must be determined first but allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through appeals.
Naveen Kasera alias Naveen Agarwal v. Union of India Secretary Ministry of Finance
The Delhi High Court quashed a COFEPOSA preventive detention order as based on stale grounds lacking a live-link with alleged prejudicial activity, emphasizing the necessity of timely and relevant material for valid detention.
BT (India) Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging tax proceedings under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, holding that jurisdictional facts must be determined but alternate remedies are available and should be pursued.
BT (India) Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging tax notices under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, holding that jurisdictional facts must be determined but alternative remedies under the Act preclude interim judicial interference.
National Federation of the Blind v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to provide reasonable accommodations to visually impaired students for remote Open Book Examinations, including accessible materials, assistive devices, scribes, and alternative physical exams, while upholding the University's authority to conduct examinations.
SMAAASH ENTERTAINMENT PVT. LTD. v. VARSICON ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's framing of an additional issue on the competency of the person signing pleadings, holding it to be a substantive question of fact requiring trial.
Laxmi Devi v. Inder Dev Sharma & Anr
The High Court dismissed the petition under Article 227, holding that concurrent findings of fact by rent control authorities on ownership and eviction cannot be interfered with absent perversity, and the petitioner failed to prove independent title to claim protection from eviction.
Sh. Rishi Rathi v. Ms. Parminder Kaur Khurana
The Delhi High Court held that an injunction order operates prospectively and acts done before the order do not amount to breach, allowing the appeal to this extent.
Suryaa Divine Homes Pvt. Ltd v. The NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an order dismissing a No Objection Certificate application due to non-receipt of internal reports and directed the respondents to reconsider the application afresh after furnishing the requisite details.
EX HC GD MOHAR SINGH v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider and grant second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme to petitioners in line with Supreme Court and Division Bench rulings, disposing of writ petitions with a twelve-week timeline.
Sonia Shamrao Naik Gaonkar v. Narcotic Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to a petitioner found in possession of commercial quantity narcotics, holding that stringent bail conditions under the NDPS Act were not met despite procedural challenges raised.
M/S. SIGMA OUTSOURCING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. v. RISHI KUMAR & ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of a suit under Section 24 CPC to be heard along with a related suit due to common questions of fact and law, to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and conflicting orders.
MS HERO FINCORP LTD v. CRYSTAL AQUA PURITY SYSTEMS
The Delhi High Court disposed of a commercial petition based on a court-facilitated settlement agreement, with parties bound by its terms and no further adjudication required.
Bivas Dey Niyogi & Ors. v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court directed the SDMC to decide pending representations regarding a lift installation NOC by a speaking order within four weeks, clarifying that the NOC is kept in abeyance only upon grant of a court stay.
Airports Authority of India v. Girja Bhan
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a retired government employee from official accommodation but extended the vacate deadline considering COVID-19 and personal hardships, directing payment of licence fees and leaving fee disputes to appropriate forums.
Balkishan Gupta v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Sections 354 and 323 IPC, dismissing the revision petition and limiting interference with concurrent findings of fact absent perversity or no evidence.
Dr. D.S. Shankar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition challenging a removal order to enable the petitioner to seek review before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
DIMECO v. CENTRAL ORGANISATION FOR MODERNIZATION OF WORKSHOPS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim injunction restraining rejection and coercive measures against a supplied machine, holding that the right to reject expired and no preservation order was warranted under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Bali Khan v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court held that an accused under the NDPS Act excluded from High Powered Committee guidelines is not entitled to automatic extension of interim bail granted on humanitarian grounds during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Garuda Construction and Engineering Pvt Ltd v. Brilliant Elevator India Co Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal against an interlocutory order under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, allowing impleadment of Delhi Police, holding that such grievances should be raised in the pending arbitration petition.