Delhi High Court
75,670 judgments
Shiromani Akali Dal Delhi & Anr. v. Directorate, Gurdwara Elections, Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal as not pressed, granting liberty to the appellants to challenge the final order of the writ petition without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Anis Khan v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking demolition of alleged unauthorized construction due to lack of cogent evidence and held that disputed factual issues cannot be decided in writ proceedings.
Ravinder Gulati v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the valuation of immovable property based on government notified circle rates for payment of court fees in a probate petition, rejecting the petitioner's challenge to a lower valuation.
Sarita Saxena v. Kailash Chandra
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition against the Directorate of Education for delayed compliance with its order, holding that delay without wilful disobedience does not constitute contempt and that merits of the administrative order must be challenged in the appropriate forum.
Union of India v. Praveen Arora & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition and upheld the Tribunal's order directing antedated promotions and consequential arrears to eligible employees, following the binding Supreme Court precedent.
HERO HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED v. MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw connected petitions and dismissed them as withdrawn, terminating the proceedings without adjudication.
Vikas Gupta & Anr. v. M/S Sahni Cosmetics
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of injunction against the respondent's use of the mark "NEHA" for creams, emphasizing mandatory licensing under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and prior user rights under the Trade Marks Act.
B S Tolani v. Land Acquisition Collector (South)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging compensation fixed for urbanized land under the Land Acquisition Act, holding the challenge barred by res judicata and availability of statutory remedy.
V.M. Singh v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court upheld interim protection against demolition during pendency of appeal against unauthorized construction, directing no further construction and disposal of appeal on merits.
GIRIRAJ EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE TRUST & ORS. v. G.D. GOENKA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
The Delhi High Court decreed a suit in terms of a mediation Settlement Agreement and ordered refund of entire court fees to the plaintiffs in line with established precedents.
G.D. Goenka Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. M/S Giriraj Educational & Welfare Trust & Another
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit in terms of a mediation settlement and granted a 50% refund of court fees as the plaintiffs' evidence had commenced before settlement.
GE T AND D INDIA LTD. v. SHIPRA INFRATECH PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed a Chartered Accountant to complete the accounting exercise mandated by an arbitral award after parties failed to agree on the appointment, ensuring effective enforcement of the award.
Suman Solanki v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court held that both North and North-West District Courts have concurrent jurisdiction over bail applications arising from a multi-location real estate cheating FIR, directing future bail applications to be filed in the North District Court given ongoing proceedings there.
Ajit Kumar Pande v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a Member (Judicial) of the Railway Claims Tribunal is not entitled to count prior practice as an Advocate for pension calculation under the Rules of 1989, distinguishing the case from DHJS and CAT Members.
Avtar Singh & Ors. v. Sakshi Srivastava & Anr.
The Delhi High Court confirmed interim injunction restraining defendants from using the mark WOODLEY, holding it deceptively similar to plaintiffs' registered trademarks WOODS and WOODLAND, emphasizing protection of dominant elements in composite marks.
Panchganga Schools Limited v. Sarabjeet Singh
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of petitions to enable parties to pursue applications under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the Arbitral Tribunal, dismissing the petitions as withdrawn subject to tribunal permission.
RAM COMUNICATION v. COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed tax authorities to examine the petitioner's claim for interest on VAT refund and pass a reasoned order if denying interest, enabling further challenge.
Narender Kumar Yadav v. Vijay Sharma
The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil suit by recording and enforcing a settlement agreement reached through court-mediated conciliation, thereby ending the land dispute between the parties.
Narendra Kumar Saxena v. Neerja Saxena
The Delhi High Court allowed a Section 11 petition appointing an arbitrator to resolve partnership disputes despite objections on limitation, jurisdiction, and family settlement, holding the arbitration agreement valid and enforceable.
Prabhat Kumar v. BSES Rajdhani Power Limited
The Delhi High Court directed BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd to grant electricity connection to the petitioner without requiring a No Objection Certificate from the landlord, subject to compliance with commercial formalities and payment of security deposit and bills.