Delhi High Court
75,670 judgments
Rajesh Gupta v. Maj. (Retd.) Surendra Kumar Hooda and Another
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding the decree for possession against the tenant's son, holding that tenancy rights do not succeed beyond one year after the original tenant's death under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Mohan Kumar Jha v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to accused involved in illegal supply of Remdesivir injections during COVID-19, emphasizing that bail denial cannot be based solely on offence magnitude when evidence is documentary and no risk of tampering exists.
Mohan Kumar Jha v. State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court granted bail to accused involved in illegal supply of fake Remdesivir injections during COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing that gravity of offence alone cannot deny bail when evidence is documentary and charge-sheet filed.
Lakshmi Bhavya Tanneeru v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the refusal of the West Bengal government to grant no objection for an IAS officer's inter-cadre transfer on grounds of marriage, holding that such refusal without cogent reasons violates her fundamental right to family life under Article 21.
Bhupender Singh @ Bhuttan v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the petitioner involved in a conspiracy aiding the escape of a notorious undertrial, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and risk of tampering with evidence.
Dr. J. Thulaseedhara Kurup v. National School of Drama
The Delhi High Court held that while a candidate recommended in a selection panel does not have an indefeasible right to appointment, the State must act fairly and not arbitrarily, and delayed or mala fide refusal to appoint can be judicially reviewed and remedied.
A. S. Senthi Vadivel v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging refusal to relieve an officer promoted to a higher pay scale for deputation to a lower pay scale post, holding the refusal and cancellation of offer valid under the applicable Office Memorandum and eligibility rules.
Mohan Kumar Jha v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to accused involved in illegal supply of Remdesivir injections during COVID-19, holding that the nature of offence alone cannot deny bail where evidence is documentary and no risk of tampering or absconding exists.
Mohan Kumar Jha v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to accused involved in illegal supply and forgery of Remdesivir injections during COVID-19, holding that the nature of offence alone cannot deny bail when evidence is documentary and no risk of tampering is shown.
Jai Kumar Goel v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to recall anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner in a property fraud case, holding no violation of settlement terms or bail conditions, and directed an inquiry into alleged fabrication of judicial documents by the complainant.
Rajesh Kumar & Ors. v. Director General, ESIC and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's interlocutory order staying promotions to Radiographer pending final adjudication, holding no interference was warranted at the interim stage.
TRF Ltd. v. The Indure Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that unconditional bank guarantees must be honored on demand unless egregious fraud or special equities are proven, dismissing TRF Ltd.'s petitions seeking stay of invocation against The Indure Private Limited.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed removal of unauthorized encroachments at Kalkaji Mandir, mandated police and civic cooperation, and ordered provision of essential facilities to ensure proper management and sanctity of the temple premises.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed removal of unauthorized encroachments at Kalkaji Mandir, mandated cooperation of all authorities including DDA, and issued comprehensive directions for temple management, law and order, and redevelopment fund administration.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed removal of unauthorized encroachments at Kalkaji Mandir, mandated police and civic cooperation, and issued comprehensive administrative and infrastructural directions to ensure proper management and safety of the temple premises.
ULTRA MEGA POWER PVT LTD v. HBL POWER SYSTEMS LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve the dispute between the parties and allowed condonation of delay in re-filing the petition.
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY & ORS. v. BRYAN PHARMACEUTICALS & ORS.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the suit against Defendant No. 11 after accepting their undertaking not to market Baricitinib for unauthorized indications, finding no cause of action survived.
Nikesh Bidhuri and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The High Court set aside an order allowing recall of a witness under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for failure to record reasons, emphasizing that judicial orders must contain reasons to demonstrate application of mind.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed removal of unauthorized encroachments in Kalkaji Mandir, mandated police and civic cooperation for temple management, and issued comprehensive administrative directions to ensure devotees' safety and facility maintenance.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed removal of unauthorized encroachments at Kalkaji Mandir, mandated police cooperation and rotation, ensured administrative and infrastructural improvements, and affirmed all authorities' compliance with its orders.