Delhi High Court
35,876 judgments
DR SHUBHAMKAR MISHRA & ANR. v. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief restraining sealing of a Diagnostic Centre on residential property under MPD-2021 pending disposal of the land use conversion application and writ petition.
Sharda Gupta & Ors. v. Registrar of Co-operative Societies & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petition with liberty to pursue remedies under Section 70 of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003.
Poonam Devi & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the absconder declaration against petitioners under Section 82 Cr.P.C. due to bona fide non-appearance caused by COVID-19 lockdown, subject to their undertaking to appear regularly before the Trial Court.
Rays Power Experts Pvt. Ltd. v. Lohia Gramin Vikas Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from EPC Agreements for solar power projects between Rays Power Experts Pvt. Ltd. and Lohia group companies.
Praveen Jain & Anr. v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the South Delhi Municipal Corporation to expeditiously decide on revocation of a sanctioned building plan and stay construction pending such decision, while preserving parties' rights to legal remedies.
Rays Power Experts Pvt. Ltd. v. Lohia Gramin Vikas Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from EPC Agreements related to Solar Power Plants, following parties' consensus on arbitration.
Rays Power Experts Pvt. Ltd. v. Lohia Gramin Vikas Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from EPC Agreements for solar power projects, facilitating arbitration as agreed by the parties.
M/S HIMGIRI AUTOMOBILES PRIVATE LIMITED v. RAM AVTAR YADAV & ORS.
The Delhi High Court referred the parties' disputes to arbitration under DIAC rules, permitting respondents to file counterclaims, and disposed of the petition without commenting on merits.
M/s Chetak International Cargo Limited v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for dissolution of a solvent company under members’ voluntary liquidation after statutory compliance and Official Liquidator’s satisfaction, despite non-receipt of Income Tax NOC.
Prem Lal Singh Yadav v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, confirming the arbitrator proposed by the respondent with the petitioner's consent despite procedural irregularities.
Living Media India Limited v. Abhishek Agarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit in terms of a valid settlement agreement and directed refund of the entire court fee following amicable settlement.
Manoj Kumar Gope & Ors. v. Intelligence Bureau
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order dismissing CAPF personnel’s plea for absorption in the Intelligence Bureau and remanded the matter for fresh consideration by the Screening Committee due to procedural lapses.
Mayank Bhasin v. Shikha Bhasin
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal by suspending the impugned order subject to the appellant’s undertaking to pay Rs. 35 lakhs by a specified date and condoned the delay in filing the appeal.
Ved Prakash v. Aashi Tanwar
The High Court upheld the Trial Court’s refusal to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in a partition suit, holding that the petitioner’s claim required evidence and the suit could not be dismissed at the preliminary stage.
Megha Bottling and Ors. v. Bankey Behari Foods
The Delhi High Court set aside orders dismissing interim applications under Order XXXIX CPC and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the existing interim order to continue pending disposal.
M/S VIJAY STEELCON PRIVATE LIMITED v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX (GST) DELHI EAST & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging seizure and tax recovery, holding that voluntary deposit under Section 74(5) of the CGST Act precludes claims of coercion or invalidity of proceedings.
Rays Power Experts Pvt. Ltd. v. Lohia Gramin Vikas Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from EPC Agreements for solar power projects, affirming the binding nature of the arbitration clause.
Ex Corporal Mukesh Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to the petitioner if similarly placed as in precedent cases, with interest on delayed arrears.
Pinaka Studios Pvt. Ltd. v. MX Media and Entertainment Pte Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim reliefs restraining use of content and producer credits, holding the termination valid under the contract and emphasizing the limited scope of Section 9 jurisdiction pending arbitration.
Baij Nath v. Bhola Nath
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the execution order directing joint possession of a co-owned property, affirming that co-owners are entitled to joint possession and settled decrees cannot be re-agitated.