Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises for redevelopment, mandated procedural fairness via an Administrator, and permitted temporary shop allotments during Navratras without conferring permanent rights.
M/S GRAND REALITY PVT. LTD. v. SHRI NANAK MEHTA
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award dismissing the petitioner's challenge except clarifying interest is payable from contract termination date, affirming arbitrator's discretion to award interest at bank rate despite contractual stipulation of higher rate.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises for redevelopment, directing regulated allotment of temporary shops and ensuring occupants' representations are considered.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises and authorized temporary shop allotments during redevelopment, emphasizing procedural fairness and coordinated administration.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld lawful eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises for redevelopment, directing due process and temporary shop allotments during Navratras.
The Indian Hotels Company Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that forfeiture of bid security without explicit contractual provision and proof of loss is illegal and quashed the forfeiture imposed on the petitioner.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises for redevelopment, mandated consideration of representations by the Administrator, and approved temporary shop allotments during Navratras.
TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD v. ABHIJIT MISHRA
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate financial disputes between Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. and Abhijit Mishra, dismissing interlocutory criminal allegations as premature.
Himmatsingh Mehta v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of molestation, considering his cooperation with investigation, advanced age, and possible ulterior motive behind the FIR.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Triumph Realty Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the ITAT's order allowing capitalization of interest earned on temporarily parked ECB funds as part of the cost of the capital asset.
M/S ARDEE INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR v. SANJEEV KAKKAR & ORS
The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil appeal by allowing the parties' joint settlement application, binding them to the terms of the compromise.
Mankind Pharma Limited v. Tata Medical and Diagnostics Limited
The Delhi High Court refused interim injunction against the use of 'OMISURE' for Covid-19 test kits, holding no trademark infringement with 'OMIPURE' pharmaceutical mark due to distinct goods and lack of confusion.
Mansi Gupta v. Prem Amar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendants' application to reject the plaint in a defamation suit, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and factual defences cannot be considered at the stage of rejection.
Dr. Sanjiv Gupta & Anr. v. Sh. S.S. Verma
The Delhi High Court allowed eviction of a tenant under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the landlord's bona fide requirement and suitability of alternate accommodation are paramount and the tenant failed to raise a triable issue.
Anjali Bhardwaj v. CPIO, Supreme Court of India
The Delhi High Court held that in the absence of a formal signed resolution by the Supreme Court Collegium, no disclosure of meeting minutes under the Right to Information Act can be compelled.
M/S SUDHIR POWER PROJECTS LTD v. M/S UNIPOWER PROJECTS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that email exchanges constituting acceptance of a work order containing an arbitration clause satisfy the 'in writing' requirement under Section 7 of the Arbitration Act, allowing appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(5).
Sanjay Chugh v. Ram Kishan
The court held that a plaintiff without ownership or possession of land can still seek injunction against nuisance affecting their adjoining premises, interpreting 'personal interest' under Section 41(j) of the Specific Relief Act broadly to uphold the suit's maintainability.
Cadence Real Estates Private Limited v. ACIT/DCIT & Ors.
The Delhi High Court clarified that its earlier judgment quashing reassessment notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act applies only to notices issued on or after 1st April 2021, excluding those issued prior to that date.
Richie Rich Exim Solutions v. Commissioner of CGST Delhi South
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST refund rejection order for failure to grant personal hearing as mandated under Rule 92 of CGST Rules, directing the revenue to provide hearing and pass a speaking order.
Principal Commissioner, GST, Delhi South v. M/S. Indraprastha Gas Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of over four years' delay in filing an appeal against a CESTAT order, holding that government departments must diligently monitor appeal status and cannot claim delay due to organizational restructuring.