Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
Krishan Gopal Aggarwal v. Dalip Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellants' applications to revive previously withdrawn stay requests, holding such attempts as abuse of process and affirming the finality of the impugned judgment.
Krishan Gopal Aggarwal v. Dalip Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellants' attempt to revive withdrawn stay applications as an abuse of process, holding that the impugned judgment operates with full force and no interim relief can be granted.
Anuj Tyagi v. The Hans Foundation Hospitals & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the striking off of the petitioner's defence for failure to file written statement within the prescribed time, holding that extensions beyond 90 days are only granted in exceptional cases with sufficient cause.
M/S CORPORATE WARRANTIES INDIA PVT LTD v. M/S SALUJA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court decreed a recovery suit in terms of a lawful settlement agreement reached through mediation, making the settlement binding and enforceable.
Pran Prabhakar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the grant of pro-rata pension to an ex-IAF personnel upon verification that he has not availed past service benefits in his current employment.
Ramvir Singh v. Sangeeta Aggarwal
The High Court held that a party asserting ownership and possession rights is entitled to be impleaded under Order I Rule 10 CPC in an injunction suit to ensure complete adjudication, even if no relief is claimed against them.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld lawful eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises for redevelopment, directing procedural fairness through an Administrator and authorizing temporary shop allotments during the transition.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld lawful eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises with procedural safeguards and permitted temporary allotment of shops for Navratras, directing coordinated redevelopment efforts.
OMAXE BUILDHOME PVT LTD v. IBRAT FAIZAN
The Delhi High Court held that it has supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to entertain petitions against NCDRC orders not appealable to the Supreme Court under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises and authorized temporary shops during redevelopment, emphasizing due process and dignified maintenance.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises and approved temporary shop allotments during redevelopment, emphasizing procedural fairness and coordinated implementation.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises to facilitate redevelopment, authorized temporary shop allotments during Navratras, and mandated coordinated implementation by civic authorities.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises, authorized temporary shops during redevelopment, and emphasized procedural fairness through hearings by a court-appointed Administrator.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises and authorized temporary allotment of shops during redevelopment, emphasizing due process and administrative oversight.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises and authorized temporary shop allotments during redevelopment, emphasizing due process and public interest.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld lawful eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises for redevelopment, allowing temporary shop allotments under administrative supervision with no permanent rights created.
SH MANPREET SINGH @SHANTU v. SH GURUCHARAN SINGH & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to hear the petitioner’s application for correction of name under Sections 152 and 151 CPC on merits after payment of costs, despite its earlier dismissal for non-appearance.
Ankita Agrawal v. Akanksha Bhargawa
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 upon parties' failure to settle and mutual consent to arbitration.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises for redevelopment, allowing temporary shops during Navratras, while ensuring due process through hearings and coordinated civic action.
Agriboard International LLC v. Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court set aside the patent rejection order for lack of inventive step due to absence of reasoned analysis and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with a speaking order.