Delhi High Court

71,673 judgments

Year:

Mahesh Chand Verma v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Apr 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2022:DHC:3113-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider and grant pro-rata pension with arrears to a discharged Air Force officer who served over 10 years, in line with government rules and prior judgments.

administrative petition_allowed Significant pro-rata pension Indian Air Force qualifying service Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972

Precitech Enclosures Systems Pvt Ltd v. Rudrapur Precision Industries & Anr.

04 Apr 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2025:DHC:1677
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court dismissed Precitech's Section 9 petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the exclusive jurisdiction clause in the Rent Agreement confers jurisdiction solely on courts at Rudrapur, despite consent to Delhi as arbitration venue.

civil petition_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction exclusive jurisdiction clause arbitral seat arbitral venue

LKT Engineering Consultants Ltd v. M/S Planning and Infrastructural Developments Consultants Pvt Ltd

01 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1175

The Delhi High Court directed constitution of a single arbitral tribunal under DIAC to adjudicate multiple disputes arising from different agreements between the same parties.

arbitration appeal_allowed arbitration single arbitral tribunal multiple disputes Memorandum of Understanding

LKT Engineering Consultants Ltd v. M/S Planning and Infrastructural Developments Consultants Pvt Ltd

01 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1174

The Delhi High Court directed consolidation of multiple disputes arising from different agreements between the same parties before a single arbitral tribunal under DIAC rules.

civil appeal_allowed arbitration consolidation arbitral tribunal multiple disputes

B4S Solutions Pvt Ltd v. ATC Telecom Infra Structure Pvt. Ltd.

01 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1173

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a service agreement after amicable settlement attempts failed.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 12(2) appointment of arbitrator

DR. M.K. SHAH MEDICAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

01 Apr 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:1167

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Dr. M.K. Shah Medical College as infructuous following a related decision in another writ petition.

administrative other writ petition infructuous disposal medical college

LKT Engineering Consultants Ltd v. M/S Planning and Infrastructural Developments Consultants Pvt Ltd

01 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1178

The Delhi High Court directed constitution of a single arbitral tribunal under DIAC to adjudicate multiple disputes arising from different agreements between the same parties.

arbitration appeal_allowed arbitration consolidation arbitral tribunal Delhi International Arbitration Centre

LKT Engineering Consultants Ltd v. M/S Planning and Infrastructural Developments Consultants Pvt Ltd

01 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1177

The Delhi High Court directed that multiple disputes arising from different agreements between the same parties be consolidated and referred to a single arbitrator appointed by DIAC under its rules.

arbitration appeal_allowed arbitration multiple disputes common arbitrator Delhi International Arbitration Centre

LKT Engineering Consultants Ltd v. M/S Planning and Infrastructural Developments Consultants Pvt Ltd

01 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1176

The Delhi High Court directed that multiple disputes between the same parties arising from different agreements be referred to a single arbitral tribunal under DIAC with one common arbitrator, ensuring efficient arbitration proceedings.

arbitration appeal_allowed arbitration multiple disputes common arbitrator Delhi International Arbitration Centre

American Express India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

01 Apr 2022 · Manmohan; Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:1186-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax authorities to dispose of pending rectification applications and grant refund with interest within twelve weeks, addressing unjustified delay.

tax appeal_allowed rectification application Income Tax Act 1961 Section 244A refund

Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi v. India HIV AIDS Alliance

01 Apr 2022 · Manmohan; Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:1185-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's grant of income tax exemption to India HIV AIDS Alliance, holding that charging management fees does not negate the charitable nature of its activities.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 11 exemption Section 12 exemption Section 2(15) charitable purpose

Sachin v. Union of India & Ors.

01 Apr 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2022:DHC:1303-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking quashing of document verification failure and direction to allow participation in the next recruitment stage due to delay caused by hospitalization.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition document verification recruitment process deadline

Dr. M.K. Shah Medical College and Research Centre v. Union of India & Anr.

01 Apr 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:1166

Delhi High Court quashed MARB's arbitrary rejection and partial approval of PG medical courses, holding that decisions ignoring assessors' reports without hearing violate natural justice and are unsustainable.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Medical Commission Act, 2019 Medical Assessment and Rating Board Postgraduate medical courses Principles of natural justice

Satish Sachiv Baba v. CPWD (M.R.D.)

01 Apr 2022 · Anu Malhotra · 2022:DHC:1168
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of a government employee following a fair departmental enquiry despite his acquittal in a related criminal case, affirming that disciplinary proceedings require proof on preponderance of probabilities and are distinct from criminal trials.

labor petition_dismissed Significant departmental enquiry termination of service criminal acquittal preponderance of probabilities

Kenya Airways v. Basant India Inc

01 Apr 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:1713
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner one final opportunity to cross-examine a witness after a procedural default caused by a clerical error, emphasizing substantial justice over technicalities.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order IX Rule 7 CPC cross-examination clerical error substantial justice

Dharmender Rana v. Union of India & Ors.

01 Apr 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2022:DHC:1304-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging dismissal from service due to unexplained delay of nearly nine years and refused reinstatement.

administrative petition_dismissed dismissal from service delay in challenge laches reinstatement

LKT Engineering Consultants Ltd v. M/S Planning and Infrastructural Developments Consultants Pvt Ltd

01 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1171

The Delhi High Court directed constitution of a single arbitral tribunal under DIAC to adjudicate multiple disputes arising from different agreements between the same parties.

arbitration appeal_allowed arbitration single arbitral tribunal multiple disputes Memorandum of Understanding

M/S PERCEPT ADVERTISING LTD. v. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.

01 Apr 2022 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2022:DHC:1170

Delhi High Court set aside arbitral award rejecting Percept's claim for cancellation charges due to BSNL's failure to ensure brand ambassador's availability, holding such rejection was manifestly erroneous and vitiated by patent illegality.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Arbitral Award Contractual obligation

India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. v. Bougainvillea Multiplex & Entertainment Centre Pvt. Ltd.

01 Apr 2022 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2022:DHC:1169

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award finding fundamental breach by ITDC despite an 'as is where is' clause, setting aside only unsupported damages for loss of profits and goodwill.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge as is where is basis fundamental breach

Krishan Gopal Aggarwal v. Dalip Singh

01 Apr 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:1372

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellants' applications to revive stay of a judgment after they had consciously withdrawn earlier stay applications, holding such revival an abuse of process and affirming that the judgment operates with full force.

civil petition_dismissed specific performance stay application abuse of process forum shopping