Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
Dr. Vikram Hingorani and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed mutation and lease deed execution in favor of Petitioners as per final partition decree, holding that outstanding dues or disputes of other co-owners cannot impede their rights.
Dr. Vikram Hingorani & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the L&DO to execute lease deeds in favor of Petitioners as undivided owners per the final partition decree, holding they are not liable for charges attributable to other co-owners and that government policy against subdivision does not bar such execution.
M/S BLUE HEAVEN COSMETICS PVT LTD v. MIDIE COSMETICS
The Delhi High Court confirmed an interim injunction restraining a defendant from selling counterfeit cosmetic products infringing the plaintiff's trademark and violating mandatory labeling requirements under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act.
Dr. Vikram Hingorani and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed mutation and lease deed execution in favor of Petitioners as per final partition decree, holding they are not liable for government dues of other co-owners and that subdivision policy does not bar undivided ownership lease deeds.
Dr. Vikram Hingorani & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Land & Development Office to execute lease deeds in favor of petitioners as per a final partition decree, holding that mutation cannot be withheld due to other parties' outstanding dues or policy against sub-division.
Tarun Nandwani v. Ram Swarup Nandwani & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal by passing a decree in terms of the parties' amicable family settlement, thereby ending the litigation.
Dream Care Furnishings Pvt. Ltd. v. Meena Enterprises and Anr.
The Delhi High Court vacated an interim injunction in a design infringement suit, holding that the plaintiff's designs were prima facie prior published and not novel, relying on e-commerce evidence of prior availability.
Nastor Farirai Ziso v. NCB
The Delhi High Court allowed modification of bail conditions permitting a foreign national accused to deposit cash in lieu of surety bond under Section 445 Cr.P.C., balancing personal liberty and flight risk.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. BMO Advisors Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tax department's appeal, holding that bonus payments to directors are deductible business expenses under Section 36(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, provided they are for services rendered and not disguised dividends.
Vivek Chauhan v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that initiation of proceedings under Section 82 Cr.P.C. requires prior issuance of a warrant and reason to believe absconding, and set aside the trial court's order initiating such proceedings against the petitioner without fulfilling these conditions.
Usha Vijay v. The State (NCT Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against probate of a duly executed Will, holding that the testatrix was of sound mind and the Will was validly attested, with no credible evidence of forgery.
Ashutosh Diwedi v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking removal of unauthorized construction by a neighbor lacking affected legal rights, reaffirming that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not available for motivated petitions without locus standi.
Contiasia Hospitality and HR Solutions Pvt Ltd v. The Commandant TSP VIII Battalion
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing disputes and counter-claims between the parties to be resolved through arbitration at DIAC.
Vikash Saini & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under sections 498A/406/34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and divorce decree, emphasizing courts' duty to encourage such settlements.
Jasvinder Singh v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court refused to quash the FIR alleging forgery and fraud in a property dispute, holding that title issues are for civil courts and criminal proceedings should continue.
Amarjit Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and related criminal proceedings under Sections 380, 427, and 442 IPC following an amicable settlement and considering the petitioner’s medical condition and bleak prospects of conviction.
Mansi Jain v. Abhinav Jain & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's discretionary order allowing the delayed written statement to be taken on record subject to payment of enhanced costs, affirming limited interference under Article 227.
State v. Rohit Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of the accused due to failure to prove identity and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt in a Section 307 IPC case.
Simmi Sethi v. Fullerton India Credit Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award as void ab initio because the arbitrator was unilaterally appointed by one party without the other party's concurrence, violating Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
SUPREME KAR SCANNERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. YOGESH GUPTA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court struck off defendant's defense for non-appearance and granted a decree to the plaintiff for recovery of amounts paid discharging defendant's liability secured by plaintiff's property.