Kalendra Narayan Singh v. Anil Kumar Sinha

Delhi High Court · 11 Apr 2022 · 2022:DHC:1297
Sanjeev Sachdeva
ARB.P. 265/2022
2022:DHC:1297
other appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator by consent of parties under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing compliance with fee and disclosure provisions.

Full Text
Translation output
ARB.P. 265/2022
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 11th April, 2022
ARB.P. 265/2022
KALENDRA NARAYAN SINGH ..... Petitioner
versus
ANIL KUMAR SINHA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Rathi and Mr. Deepak Khatri, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Mr. Kshatrshal Raj, Advocate.
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

1. Petitioner seeks appointment of an Arbitrator in terms of the Collaboration Agreement with Agreement to Sell dated 15.07.2014.

2. Learned counsel for respondent submits that without prejudice to their defence, they have no objection to appointment of a sole arbitrator.

3. Since the parties are agreeable to reference of their disputes to arbitration, the petition is allowed. 2022:DHC:1297 ARB.P. 265/2022

4. With the consent of the parties Ms Amrita Panda, Advocate (Mobile No. +91 9910668787; email: amrita@adpchambers.in ) is appointed as the Sole Arbitrator. The Arbitral tribunal shall entertain the claims and counter claims, if any, of the parties.

5. The fees of the learned Arbitrator shall be as per the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6. The Arbitrator shall furnish the requisite disclosure in terms of Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 within two weeks of entering reference.

7. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J APRIL 11, 2022 NA