Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
HERO WIND ENERGY PVT. LTD. & ANR. v. MR. BALACHANDRA NADAR & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition for non-payment under a settlement agreement as barred by limitation and lacking wilful disobedience, clarifying that failure to pay without a fixed timeline does not attract contempt jurisdiction.
KV Sagar v. Government of NCT & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking CBI investigation into a petty dispute due to lack of exceptional circumstances and abuse of court process after earlier withdrawal of identical petition.
Nadeem Qureshi v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking reconstruction and damages for a demolished property held to be an encroachment on public land, emphasizing that disputed factual issues of title and possession must be resolved by civil courts.
DR REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED v. CHANDAN M A AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award rejecting a domain name dispute, holding that the petitioner’s trademark '2DG' was infringed and the award suffered from patent illegality.
DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the Customs authorities to treat the writ petition as a representation, grant a personal hearing, and pass a speaking order on the petitioner’s claim for amendment of bills of entry and refund of excess customs duty within eight weeks.
Medela India Private Limited v. Walnut Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause conferring exclusive jurisdiction on Delhi courts establishes Delhi as the seat of arbitration, thereby granting the court jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Shri Kusum Lata v. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges against the petitioner for child trafficking and kidnapping, holding that sufficient prima facie material existed and revisional interference was unwarranted.
HK Toll Road Private Limited v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court held that damages certified by NHAI under the Concession Agreement are payable forthwith and recoverable from the escrow account notwithstanding any dispute, dismissing the petition seeking injunction against such recovery.
SAP SE v. ANOOP TECH AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against unauthorized use of SAP’s trademark and copyrighted materials by Anoop Tech for offering training courses, awarding costs to the Plaintiff.
Narsingh Shah v. BDR Developers Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's interim order directing the petitioner to pay alleged arrears without prejudice to rights, dismissing the petition challenging the payment direction.
M/S PSA POLYMERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. MR. RAJENDER MALHOTRA
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint cannot be returned for non-compliance with pre-litigation mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 when the mediation regime was not operational at the time of filing, and remitted the suit for further proceedings.
ANJNEY LOYS PVT. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a tax demand and recovery certificate, directing the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy of filing objections under Section 74 of the DVAT Act.
Mukesh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a sexual assault case after prolonged incarceration and completion of prosecution evidence, balancing the right to liberty with the interests of justice.
APEX BUILDSYS LTD. v. PRIME HITECH INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension for concluding arbitration proceedings due to the petitioner’s unavoidable delays caused by illness, financial hardship from Covid-19, and insolvency proceedings.
M/S KELVOLT(INDIA)PVT.LTD. v. M/S SHAPOORJI PALLONJI AND COMPANY PVT.LTD.
The Delhi High Court directed disputes under a contract containing an arbitration clause to be referred to DIAC for arbitration and corrected a typographical error in a prior order.
M/S KEEPWELL SECURITY SERVICES v. DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT CARETAKING BRANCH & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the validity and evaluation of a sanitation services tender, holding that the petitioner lacked locus and the bid validity extension was lawful.
Parsvnath Developers Ltd. v. Future Retail Limited
The Delhi High Court held that at the pre-reference stage under Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration Act, the court must confine itself to existence of an arbitration agreement and appoint an arbitrator, leaving issues of stamp duty and limitation to the arbitral tribunal.
Shrim Industries Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Authorized Officer Bank of Baroda & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted limited interim protection for 15 days to petitioners to approach the DRAT with a statutory appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, subject to compliance with pre-deposit requirements.
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited v. The Controller of Patents & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that revocation petitions under Section 64 of the Patents Act are not subject to any limitation period and can be filed anytime during the patent's life by a 'person interested.'
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited v. The Controller of Patents & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that revocation petitions under Section 64 of the Patents Act are not subject to any limitation period under the Limitation Act and can be filed any time during the life of the patent by a person interested.