Delhi High Court

71,673 judgments

Year:

Vossloh Beekay Castings Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax Circle- 26 (2)

13 Apr 2022 · Manmohan; Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:1375-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the disallowance of commission expenditure where the appellant failed to prove that services were rendered by the agent.

tax appeal_dismissed commission expenditure disallowance Income Tax Appellate Tribunal proof of service

Anju Kumari v. Puneet Kumar

13 Apr 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:1544-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld denial of maintenance to the wife with independent means but enhanced maintenance for the minor child, emphasizing the distinction between capacity to earn and actual earnings under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_allowed Significant maintenance Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 24 pendente lite maintenance

Pankaj Pal v. Kiran Goel

13 Apr 2022 · Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:1516

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding the landlord's bona fide requirement valid and dismissing the tenant's revision petition for lack of triable issues.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide requirement eviction

Shrenuj Investment and Finance Private Limited v. STCI Finance Limited

13 Apr 2022 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2022:DHC:1393

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award in a loan dispute, ruling that formal framing of issues is not mandatory in arbitration and that sale of pledged shares evidenced by Contract Notes suffices to prove realization of proceeds.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 21 Arbitral Award

Renuka Biswas v. The State NCT of Delhi

13 Apr 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:1390
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a woman accused of possessing commercial quantity of heroin, holding that stringent conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not met and special bail provisions for women under the CrPC do not apply.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS bail commercial quantity

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Imperial Housing Ventures P. Ltd.

13 Apr 2022 · Manmohan; Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:1376-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the income tax department's appeal upholding the deletion of unexplained expenditure addition where concurrent findings confirmed receipt of goods and payments through banking channels.

tax appeal_dismissed Income Tax Appellate Tribunal unexplained expenditure bogus entities concurrent findings

MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED v. NAVA HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD. & ORS.

13 Apr 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1373

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Macleods Pharmaceuticals against defendants using identical marks and trade dress for pharmaceutical products, rejecting denial of involvement and holding all liable for trademark infringement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off trade dress permanent injunction

Sabyasachi Calcutta LLP v. Mr. Ankit Keyal Proprietor Asiana Couture & Ors.

13 Apr 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:1377

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining defendants from infringing the plaintiff's registered garment designs, emphasizing protection of registered designs against obvious imitation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant registered design design infringement permanent injunction interim injunction

V PLUS TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD v. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR

13 Apr 2022 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:1595

The Delhi High Court held that freezing a bank account under Section 91 CrPC is impermissible and non-compliance with mandatory reporting under Section 102 CrPC vitiates the freeze, directing de-freezing subject to bond.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 91 CrPC Section 102 CrPC debit freeze bank account freezing

MS GLOBAL COORDINATES v. MRS SIMRIT SINGH & ANR.

13 Apr 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:1311

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of the petition with liberty to seek installment payment of the decretal amount before the trial court, staying the impugned order only until the application is heard.

civil appeal_allowed withdrawal of petition installment payment decretal amount stay of order

Sourabh Shrivastava & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

13 Apr 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Poonam A. Bamba · 2022:DHC:1360-DB

The Delhi High Court granted interim relief maintaining status quo over a secured property pending hearing before the Debt Recovery Tribunal-III due to tribunal delays and non-functioning.

civil petition_allowed Debt Recovery Tribunal status quo interim relief writ petition

Mohinder Kumar v. Union of India and Anr.

13 Apr 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:1674-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that a Reference Petition filed about 10 years after the land acquisition award is barred by limitation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and delay cannot be condoned without bona fide reasons.

property petition_dismissed Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 12(2) Section 18(2) limitation

Deepak Kumar Saxena v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

13 Apr 2022 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:1600

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act against a petitioner who unknowingly possessed live ammunition, holding that conscious possession is essential for criminal liability under the Act.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 25 Arms Act conscious possession unconscious possession ammunition

Chandra Rolling Mills Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Anr

13 Apr 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Poonam A. Bamba · 2022:DHC:1444-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging rejection of benefits under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme as infructuous since the petitioner succeeded in the appellate tribunal.

administrative petition_dismissed Sabka Vishwas Scheme Finance Act 2019 Designated Committee Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal

Manoj Loharia v. Sanjeev Gupta & Ors.

13 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1348

The Delhi High Court held that in absence of any stipulation for interest on delayed payment of costs, payment of awarded costs, even if belated, satisfies the decree and no further execution is warranted.

civil petition_dismissed execution of decree costs interest on delayed payment Order 21 CPC

Pradeep Kumar Sharma v. Deepika Sharma

13 Apr 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:1340
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the maintenance order granted to the wife under Section 125 Cr.P.C., holding that allegations of adultery and desertion without sufficient proof do not disentitle her to maintenance.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance living in adultery burden of proof

LEASEPLAN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. SAGAR TOUR AND TRAVELS & ANR.

13 Apr 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:1347

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to appoint an arbitrator under a valid arbitration clause and referred disputes to arbitration after respondents failed to appear despite proper service.

civil appeal_allowed arbitration agreement appointment of arbitrator ex parte proceedings service of notice

Manikandan B. & Anr v. Pavan Gaur

13 Apr 2022 · Asha Menon · 2022:DHC:1328

The Delhi High Court quashed defamation proceedings against a company and its director, holding that a juristic person cannot possess mens rea and that continuation of the case would be an abuse of process given unimpeachable material negating defamation.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. defamation mens rea juristic person

Arman Khan v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation

13 Apr 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:1712

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging unauthorized construction for lack of locus standi and failure to show infringement of fundamental or legal rights.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant unauthorized construction locus standi Article 226 fundamental rights

Prem Chand v. Union of India

13 Apr 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:1675-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging 1966 land acquisition proceedings, holding that acquisition had not lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, the petitioner lacked locus standi, and the petition was barred by delay and laches.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) of 2013 Act deemed lapse possession