Sohanbir Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

Delhi High Court · 20 Apr 2022 · 2022:DHC:2381
Sudhir Kumar Jain
CRL.A. 1082/2017
2022:DHC:2381
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition to set aside dismissal of a Section 138 NI Act complaint due to default in payment, directing a payment schedule and permitting revival on further default.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.A. 1082/2017
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: April 20, 2022
CRL.A. 1082/2017
SOHANBIR SINGH ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Prem Priyavardhan, Advocate with appellant in person.
VERSUS
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State (through VC)
Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate (Amicus Curiae) for R-2 with R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. The appellant has filed a criminal complaint titled as Sohanbir Singh vs Gyanender Sharma bearing M.No. 683/2016 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act 1881, which was pending for consideration in the Court of Mrs. Babita Puniya, MM (Mahila Courts-02) Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi against the respondents.

2. The appellant and the respondents, during the pendency of the said criminal complaint, entered into a compromise vide mediation No. 206/17. The concerned trial court due to the compromise entered into between the appellant and the respondents, dismissed the complaint in default as settled vide order dated 17.04.2017.

3. The respondent no. 2 stated to have been committed default in payment of settled amount. Due to this reason, the appellant filed the present petition under Section 378(4) read with Section 482, Code of 2022:DHC:2381 CRL.A. 1082/2017 Criminal Procedure, 1973 for setting aside the order dated 17.04.2017 passed by Mrs. Babita Puniya, MM, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts whereby the complaint filed by the appellant was ordered to be dismissed in default as settled.

4. During the hearing of the present petition, the efforts are made to settle the dispute between the appellant and the respondent no. 2. The respondent no. 2 states that he is ready to pay Rs.[2] Lacs to the appellant towards full and final settlement of all the claims of the appellant subject matter of the present petition on or before 31.03.2023 with minimum of Rs.10,000/- per month on or before 15th day of each English calendar month. The said offer is accepted by the appellant; accordingly the respondent no. 2 is directed to pay Rs.[2] Lacs to the appellant towards full and final settlement of all the claims of appellant as per the subject matter of the present petition on or before 31.03.2023 with minimum of Rs.10,000/- per month w.e.f. May, 2022.

5. The respondent no. 2 is directed to pay the monthly instalment of settled amount on or before 15th day of each English calendar month by directly depositing in the account of the appellant or by paying in cash against a proper receipt.

6. The present petition is accordingly disposed of. However, the appellant shall be at liberty to revive the petition in case the respondent no. 2 commits two consecutive defaults in making the payment of monthly instalments as per the settlement.

JUDGE APRIL 20, 2022