Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
Dr Vimla Menon and Another v. Gopinath Menon
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s discretion to orally examine parties under Order X CPC to clarify ambiguities in affidavits despite alternate remedies under Order XI Rule 21 CPC.
Shrutee Exports Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that assessment orders under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 passed without granting personal hearing violate natural justice and must be quashed and remanded.
DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD v. M/S J. KUMAR-CRTG JV
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting partial compensation to the contractor for unforeseen site conditions and employer's delay, rejecting challenges to the award's factual findings and contractual interpretations.
DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD v. M/S J. KUMAR-CRTG JV
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award partially allowing contractor's claims for unforeseen conditions and delay compensation, rejecting challenges on interest recovery and remand requests under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed erection of a boundary wall to prevent encroachments, regulated allotment of temporary shops, mandated baridaars' monthly deposits prior to offerings distribution, and ordered cooperation of government authorities for redevelopment of Kalkaji Mandir premises.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed erection of a boundary wall to prevent encroachments, regulated allotment of temporary shops, enforced baridaars' financial contributions, and mandated cooperation among authorities for the redevelopment and management of Kalkaji Mandir premises.
Neeta Bhardwaj v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed erection of a boundary wall to prevent encroachments at Kalkaji Mandir, regulated allotment of temporary shops, mandated timely financial deposits by baridaars prior to puja distribution, and ordered coordinated efforts for Mandir redevelopment and management.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed erection of a boundary wall to prevent encroachments at Kalkaji Mandir, regulated allotment of temporary shops, enforced baridaars' financial contributions, and mandated cooperation among authorities for Mandir redevelopment.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directs erection of a boundary wall to prevent encroachments, regulates allotment of shops, and mandates timely financial deposits by baridaars to ensure proper administration and redevelopment of Kalkaji Mandir.
Dr Chandan Kumar Pal v. UPSC
The Delhi High Court held that conducting separate interviews for reserved and unreserved categories is illegal and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication, allowing the petitioners to challenge the recruitment process despite their participation.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed erection of a boundary wall to prevent encroachments and regulated allotment and financial contributions for redevelopment and management of Kalkaji Mandir premises.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed erection of a boundary wall to prevent encroachments, regulated allotment of temporary shops, and enforced financial contributions by baridaars for the redevelopment and administration of Kalkaji Mandir.
Innovators Façade Systems Limited v. Airports Authority of India
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting claims for extra aluminium consumption, overhead expenses, and loss of opportunity, emphasizing that unilateral extra work claims without consent and contractual undertakings waiving additional claims bar relief under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed erection of a boundary wall to prevent encroachments at Kalkaji Mandir, regulated allotment of temporary shops, enforced baridaars' deposit obligations, and mandated coordinated administrative and police cooperation for redevelopment and management.
Shail Shukla v. DDA
The Delhi High Court directed DDA to hand over possession of a reserved plot to the petitioner who paid all dues and withdrew her refund request, holding that allotment rights remain valid despite administrative delays.
Angela Rani Bhasin @ Angela Sharma v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Section 482 CrPC following an amicable settlement between the parties safeguarding minor children's rights.
Manish Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a serious sexual assault case, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and imposing conditions to prevent witness intimidation.
Bandana Jain v. Jitin Verma Proprietor Jatin Vermas IAS Academy
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of three petitions following an out-of-court settlement between the parties and disposed of the matters accordingly.
Vinod Rathore v. State NCT of Delhi
Bail was denied to the petitioner accused of possessing commercial quantity of charas under the NDPS Act, as minor sample weight discrepancies did not prove tampering and stringent bail conditions under Section 37 NDPS were not met.
Manish Gupta v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a complaint filed by a single member Appropriate Authority appointed for part of the State under the PC&PNDT Act is valid, dismissing petitions seeking quashing of such complaints and upholding the framing of charges.