Anshika Garg v. State

Delhi High Court · 04 May 2022 · 2022:DHC:5998
Talwant Singh
W.P.(CRL)2624/2019 & CRL.M.A.35995/2019
2022:DHC:5998
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of petitions as infructuous upon the State filing a closure report pending acceptance by the trial court.

Full Text
Translation output
$-37 & 38 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL)2624/2019& CRL.M.A.35995/2019
SMT.ANSHIKA GARG Petitioner
Through: Ranjana Roy Gawai and Ujjwal Jain, Advocates.
VERSUS
STATIi& ANR. Respondents
Through: Mr.Chirag Khurana,Advocate for Ashish Aggarwal,ASC for State.
^ W.P.(CRL)2627/2019&CRL.M.A.36018/2019 ^ SMT.SARITA GARG Petitioner
Through: Ranjana Roy Gawai and Ujjwal Jain, Advocates.
VERSUS
STATE& ANR. Respondents
Through: Ms.Jyoti Babbar,Advocate for Mr.Rajesh Mahajan,ASC for State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
ORDER o/„ 04.05.2022
JUDGMENT

1. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that closure report dated 30.07.2020 has already been filed in Court, which is pending for its acceptance by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate.

2. In view ofthis,present petitions are hereby disposed ofasthey have becomeinfruetuous. ^ TALWANT SINGH,J MAY[4],IQlllmr h^rp tn checkcorrifrpndum.ifany 2022:DHC:5998