Delhi High Court

71,423 judgments

Year:

Nitin Rekhan v. Union of India & Ors.

15 Jul 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:3455

The Delhi High Court held that share application money paid before 2014 cannot be treated as a deposit under the Companies Act, 2013, dismissing the writ petition seeking prosecution and penal interest.

corporate petition_dismissed Significant Companies Act, 2013 Companies Act, 1956 Acceptance of Deposits share application money

Ajya Pal Ogrey v. Union of India & Ors.

15 Jul 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:2645-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with arrears and interest to a discharged Air Force personnel in line with established pension rules and prior judgments.

administrative petition_allowed Significant pro-rata pension Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Notification no. 28/30/2004-P & PW (B) writ of mandamus

Krishan Kumar Yadav v. The Union of India and Ors.

15 Jul 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:2620-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the BSF to consider the petitioner's representation seeking pension after dismissal of his appeal against service dismissal for suppression of educational qualification, without quashing the dismissal orders.

administrative other dismissal from service suppression of educational qualification appeal under BSF Rules Section 117(2) BSF Rules

Glitter Overseas & Ors. v. MMTC Limited

15 Jul 2022 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2022:DHC:2597
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

Delhi High Court partially set aside an arbitral award in a commercial dispute between Glitter Overseas and MMTC Limited, reducing interest and claim amounts but upholding liability for unpaid invoices and confiscated gold.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Export Agreement Hypothecation Agreement

Jain Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Registrar Cooperative Societies & Anr.

15 Jul 2022 · Siddharth Mridul; Amit Sharma · 2022:DHC:2592-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Cooperative Tribunal's orders setting aside the expulsion of a cooperative bank member due to lack of substantive evidence beyond an FIR and ongoing investigation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 expulsion of member FIR and charge sheet quasi-judicial order

Gurdeep Singh v. Jaspal Kaur Legal Heirs

15 Jul 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:2722-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award dissolving a partnership and distributing assets, emphasizing limited judicial interference under the Arbitration Act and rejecting claims of partnership ownership over disputed properties and enforcement of an unproved family settlement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 Patent illegality

Nitin Rekhan v. Union of India & Ors.

15 Jul 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:2595

The Delhi High Court held that share application money paid before 1st April 2014 cannot be treated as a deposit under the Companies Act, 2013, and dismissed the writ petition seeking prosecution for non-payment of penal interest.

corporate petition_dismissed Significant Companies Act, 2013 Companies Act, 1956 Acceptance of Deposits Share application money

Amar Sinha v. R.C. Chopra

15 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:2726

The Delhi High Court transferred an execution petition to the court having territorial jurisdiction over the disputed property, emphasizing the necessity of proper jurisdiction in execution proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed transfer petition execution petition territorial jurisdiction Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996

Manju Devi v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

14 Jul 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:2733
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking compassionate employment for the petitioner’s son under a withdrawn HPCL scheme, holding that the petitioner’s acceptance of monetary benefits precludes entitlement to compassionate appointment.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant compassionate employment superannuation benefit scheme withdrawal of scheme Article 14

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. Future First Info. Services Pvt. Ltd.

14 Jul 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:2600-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of disallowances under Sections 40A(ia) and 40A(2) of the Income Tax Act, ruling that short deduction of tax under a wrong provision does not warrant disallowance and that remuneration disallowance requires cogent evidence.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 40A(ia) Income Tax Act Section 40A(2) Income Tax Act short deduction of tax assessee in default

Ex. Recruit/Constable Deepak Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

14 Jul 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:2626-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of a BSF constable seeking reinstatement after dismissal for unauthorized absence, holding that belated medical certificates and delay barred relief.

administrative petition_dismissed unauthorized absence dismissal from service reinstatement medical re-examination

Mohd. Kasim v. BSES Rajdhani Power Limited & Anr.

14 Jul 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:2606

The Delhi High Court directed BSES to grant electricity connection to the petitioner upon fresh application and compliance with formalities, rejecting third-party objections without legal basis.

administrative petition_allowed electricity connection Article 226 utility services electricity meter

Vishwanath Kumar & Ors. v. National Testing Agency & Ors.

14 Jul 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:2587

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking postponement of NEET UG 2022, holding that the examination schedule fixed by statutory authorities is an administrative decision not liable to judicial interference absent manifest arbitrariness.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant NEET UG 2022 examination schedule postponement manifest arbitrariness

SKECHERS USA INC II v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

14 Jul 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:2633

Delhi High Court set aside Registrar's refusal of 'RELAXEDFIT' trademark for lack of reasoned order and improper invocation of Section 11, directing registration subject to disclaimer.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark registration Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 18(5) Section 11(5)

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-20 v. Suman Agarwal

14 Jul 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:2759-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that additions to income under Section 153A cannot be made for completed assessments without incriminating material found during search operations.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153A Income Tax Act incriminating material search and seizure completed assessment

Doctutorials Edutech Private Limited v. Telegram FZ-LLC & Ors.

14 Jul 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:2605

The Delhi High Court confirmed permanent injunction and take-down orders against unauthorized sharing of copyrighted medical coaching content on Telegram and Mega platforms, while leaving open the question of subscriber data disclosure.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant copyright infringement permanent injunction take-down orders intermediary liability

Harpal Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi

14 Jul 2022 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2022:DHC:2610

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of sexual offences under IPC and POCSO Act, considering prosecutrix's examination, inconsistencies in evidence, and prolonged custody.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 CrPC Section 482 CrPC sexual offences

Aishwarya Attrey v. Central Bureau of Investigation

14 Jul 2022 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2022:DHC:2608

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to a GST officer accused of illegal seizure of gold during a raid, finding no evidence to substantiate the allegations and emphasizing cooperation with investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. Prevention of Corruption Act illegal seizure

Premier Timber and Trading Pvt. Ltd v. PR Commissioner Customs Import

14 Jul 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:2635-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that limitation periods affecting substantive rights like SAD refund claims cannot be prescribed by notification but must be enacted by statute, allowing the appellant's refund claim beyond the one-year period prescribed by notification.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Special Additional Duty of Customs limitation period refund claim notification

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-20 v. Kavita Agarwal

14 Jul 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:2760-DB

The Delhi High Court held that no additions can be made under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act for a completed assessment year in the absence of incriminating material found during search.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 153A Section 132 search incriminating material