Maunicka Makkar & Anr. v. Madalsa Sood

Delhi High Court · 18 Jul 2022 · 2022:DHC:2666-DB
Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee
RFA(OS) 3/2022
2022:DHC:2666-DB
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court recorded the parties' settlement prior to framing of issues, disposed of the appeal accordingly, and directed refund of court fees to both parties.

Full Text
Translation output
RFA(OS) 3/2022
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 18.07.2022
RFA(OS) 3/2022 & CM APPL. 4542/2022
MAUNICKA MAKKAR & ANR. ..... Appellants
Through: Mr.Vikrant N. Goyal with Mr.Saurabh K., Mr.Shikar Sardana, Mr.Mayank & Mr.Ajay Singh, Advocates.
VERSUS
MADALSA SOOD ..... Respondent
Through: Mr.Rajat Aneja & Ms.Chandrika Gupta, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
JUDGMENT
(oral)
CM APPL. 31352/2022

1. Present application has been jointly filed by the appellants and the respondent under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for recording of the compromise arrived at between the parties.

2. Vide order dated 22.03.2022, the matter was referred to Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre for making an effort to amicably 2022:DHC:2666-DB resolve their disputes.

3. Today, learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that parties interse has already settled their disputes before Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre (SAMADHAN) vide Settlement Agreement dated 09.05.2022. Settlement Agreement is taken on record.

4. In view of above, application is allowed and disposed of. RFA(OS) 3/2022 & CM APPL. 4542/2022

5. In view of order passed in CM APPL. 31352/2022, present appeal is disposed of in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 09.05.2022.

6. Needless to say, parties shall be bound by the terms of aforesaid Settlement Agreement.

7. This court has been informed that the matter has been settled prior the stage of framing of issues. However, eviction order was passed during the pendency of the suit.

8. At this stage, learned counsel for the parties pray for refund of entire Court fee deposited by the appellant in the present appeal and respondents in CS(OS) 93/2021.

9. Keeping in view of the aforesaid facts, we find that the matter has been settled at the prior stage of the framing of issues and the fact that the plaintiff/ respondent herein is 84 years old, widow, we hereby direct the Registry to refund the entire court fee in favour of the plaintiff/respondent deposited by her in CS(OS) 93/2021. Registry is further directed to refund court fee in favour of the appellants herein deposited by them in the present appeal.

10. Registry is also directed to issue necessary certificates/ authorization in favour of the plaintiff/respondent of CS(OS) 93/2021 and appellant to seek refund before the appropriate authorities.

11. In view of above, present appeal and pending application are accordingly disposed of.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (SAURABH BANERJEE)

JUDGE JULY 18, 2022