Delhi High Court

71,423 judgments

Year:

Desh Deepak Srivastava & Ors. v. Delhi High Court & Anr.

18 Jul 2022 · Vibhu Bahru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:2621-DB

The Delhi High Court held that contractual employees appointed under the e-Courts project have no right to absorption into permanent service, dismissing their writ petition challenging termination and vacancy notices.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant contractual employment absorption regularization e-Courts mission mode project

Jatinder Singh v. Mahant Ayudhya Dass & Anr.

18 Jul 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2689

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court’s refusal to recall an ex-parte order due to the petitioner’s deliberate non-appearance and delay tactics.

civil petition_dismissed Order IX Rule 7 CPC ex-parte order recall of ex-parte order cross-examination

Dinesh Rana v. Union of India & Ors.

18 Jul 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:2668-DB

Delhi High Court directs respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with arrears and interest to an ex-IAF employee joining civilian service, in line with binding precedents.

administrative petition_allowed Significant pro-rata pension Indian Air Force Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Notification no. 28/30/2004-P & PW (B)

The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation 3 v. Zaheer Mauritious

18 Jul 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:2651-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that gains from transfer of Compulsorily Convertible Debentures are capital gains exempt from Indian tax under the India-Mauritius DTAA, dismissing the tax department's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Compulsorily Convertible Debentures Capital Gains Interest Income Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement

Excitel Private Limited v. The Registrar of Trade Marks

18 Jul 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:2681

Delhi High Court allowed Excitel's appeal, holding that website evidence and settlement with Google establish use and distinctiveness of the 'REELTIME' mark, directing its registration and advertisement.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 11(1) Section 65B IT Act Trademark registration

Umar Faruq v. The State Govt. of NCT Delhi

15 Jul 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:5973

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners on the ground of parity with the main accused, subject to cooperation with investigation and non-interference with the victim.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail parity cooperation with investigation victim protection

Rajpal v. State NCT of Delhi

15 Jul 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:2877
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Magistrate's issuance of warrants and declaration of the petitioner as proclaimed absconder in a serious criminal case, affirming the Magistrate's jurisdiction to issue warrants at the cognizance stage without prior summons.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 204 Cr.P.C. Section 82 Cr.P.C. Section 87 Cr.P.C. non-bailable warrant

Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma

15 Jul 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:2630

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises while protecting recognized pujaris during redevelopment, directing coordinated action for redevelopment and stakeholder consultation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Kalkaji Mandir redevelopment eviction of unauthorized occupants dharamshala occupation pujaris' rights

Star India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Y1.MYLIVECRICKET.BIZ & Ors.

15 Jul 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:2634
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld injunctions restraining unauthorized streaming of IPL 2021 matches by rogue websites and directed regulatory authorities and ISPs to block infringing sites, decreeing the suit in favor of the exclusive rights holders.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed exclusive broadcasting rights IPL 2021 injunction unauthorized streaming

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Professional Assistance for Development Action

15 Jul 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:2629-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision granting tax exemption under Section 11 to a charitable organization, holding that absence of profit motive excludes the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 2(15) Section 11 exemption charitable purpose

Sandeep Garg v. State & Ors.

15 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:3110

The Delhi High Court transferred a probate petition from the District Court to itself due to jurisdictional limits under Section 273 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, avoiding procedural delays by not requiring withdrawal and refiling.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Probate petition Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 273 proviso Jurisdiction

Zuric Traders v. The Commissioner, Customs and Central Excise, Delhi and Anr

15 Jul 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:2803-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the blocking of the petitioner's bank account for non-compliance with statutory requirements under Section 83 of the CGST Act, emphasizing the need for jurisdictional facts and procedural fairness.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Section 83 CGST Act provisional attachment blocking bank account natural justice

Manoj and Anr v. M/s Monk Trading Pvt Ltd and Ors

15 Jul 2022 · Gaurang Kanth · 2022:DHC:3020

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree affirming the validity of registered sale deeds, ownership and possession rights of the respondent, and dismissed the appellants' claim of forgery and ancestral ownership, awarding possession and mesne profits to the respondent.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant registered sale deed burden of proof forgery possession

Roshan Lal v. UOI and Ors.

15 Jul 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:2748-DB

The Delhi High Court directed grant of invalid pension with interest to a government servant invalidated due to service-related mental disability despite less than 10 years of qualifying service, emphasizing presumption of service connection and procedural fairness.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant invalid pension disability pension CCS Pension Rules 1972 service connection

S.B. Ram v. Union of India & Anr

15 Jul 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:2734

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking a Mandamus to implement advisory recommendations of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes, holding such recommendations are not binding and the petitioner failed to challenge the Corporation's considered order rejecting them.

administrative petition_dismissed National Commission for Scheduled Castes Efficiency Bar writ of Mandamus Article 226

Raju Chaudhary v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

15 Jul 2022 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:2598
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court suspended the sentence of a POCSO Act convict who had served over 60% of his term and faced family hardship, subject to conditions, during the pendency of his appeal.

criminal sentence_modified Significant Suspension of sentence POCSO Act Interim relief Appellate court

Tanveer Alam v. GNCTD & Anr

15 Jul 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:2646-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's non-grant of interim relief, holding that mere listing orders are not appealable and do not warrant Court interference.

civil petition_dismissed interim relief appealability Tribunal orders interlocutory orders

Satya Prakash v. Union of India

15 Jul 2022 · The Chief Justice; Subramonium Prasad; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2022:DHC:2596-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's dismissal of the petitioner's claim for service allocation and seniority after resignation from CISF, affirming adherence to Supreme Court directions and reservation rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Civil Services Examination 1996 reservation policy OBC category service allocation

Amresh Chandra Mathur v. Central Information Commissioner and Ors.

15 Jul 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:2615-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the CIC's order, holding that the information sought under the RTI Act had been provided and that regulatory grievances fall outside the CIC's jurisdiction.

administrative appeal_dismissed Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 18 RTI Act Chief Information Commissioner information disclosure

Harkesh Chadha v. The State & Another

15 Jul 2022 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2022:DHC:2678

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellate court's refusal to admit additional evidence under Section 391 CrPC in a cheque bounce case, emphasizing that such evidence must be necessary to prevent failure of justice and not cause undue delay.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 391 CrPC Additional evidence Dishonoured cheque