Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Arvind Dham v. IDBI Bank Limited

27 Aug 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6493

The Delhi High Court issued notice on a writ petition challenging a bank's fraud declaration against a promoter-director, declined interim relief, and directed further proceedings after examining document supply and status of the petitioner.

administrative other Fraud Examination Committee Show Cause Notice Promoter-Director Non-executive Director

X v. Y

27 Aug 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:6604-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal by enforcing a settlement dissolving the marriage on desertion grounds with agreed compensation.

family appeal_allowed Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia) Section 13(1)(ib) desertion

Priya Ranjan Sinha v. State of NCT of Delhi

27 Aug 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6551

The Delhi High Court quashed the proclamation of the petitioner as a Proclaimed Offender under Section 82 Cr.P.C. due to non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements including issuance and execution of warrants and proper publication of proclamation.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 82 Cr.P.C. Proclaimed Offender Non-bailable Warrant Publication of Proclamation

M/S USHA INDIA LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

27 Aug 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6506

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the bank to release fixed deposits held in the DRT account to the corporate debtor through its Interim Resolution Professional under the IBC moratorium.

corporate petition_allowed Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Interim Resolution Professional Fixed Deposit Receipts SARFAESI Act, 2002

Rahul Narula v. Union of India & Ors.

27 Aug 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6512

The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of animal cruelty prevention directions, holding that newspaper reports alone cannot constitute legally admissible evidence for contempt.

criminal petition_dismissed contempt proceedings wilful disobedience Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act newspaper reports as evidence

M/S A AND B TOUR TRAVELS v. M/S APPEAL FOOTWEAR PVT.LTD

27 Aug 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6603

The Delhi High Court upheld conviction under Section 138 N.I. Act for cheque dishonour, affirming partner liability and sufficiency of legal notice service despite procedural irregularities.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Presumption under Section 139 Partnership firm liability

Shriram EPC Ltd. v. M/S Apex Crane Company

27 Aug 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:6602-DB

The Delhi High Court condoned delay and modified the decree to exclude pre-suit interest following settlement between parties in a commercial suit appeal.

civil appeal_allowed condonation of delay pre-suit interest commercial suit decree modification

Dheeraj Bhardwaj v. Meenakshi Pandey

27 Aug 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:6611

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal to enforce a foreign divorce decree not based on grounds recognized under the Hindu Marriage Act, allowing the appellant to file appropriate proceedings under Indian law.

family appeal_dismissed Significant foreign decree enforcement dissolution of marriage Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 family court

Deen Mohammad v. State NCT of Delhi

27 Aug 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6618

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case considering delay in trial and procedural compliance in sample collection, subject to stringent conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail NDPS Act Section 52A sample collection

Royal Sundaram General Insurance Company v. Shivani & Ors.

27 Aug 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:6436
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award holding the insurance company liable for compensation in a case of accidental murder arising from rash and negligent driving, distinguishing it from murder simpliciter.

motor_vehicle_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant accidental murder murder simpliciter Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 MV Act

Mira Gupta v. Dinesh Chand (Deceased) Thr Lrs & Ors

27 Aug 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:6435
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of the appellant's claim, holding the alleged revocation deed invalid and affirming the original Will's testamentary succession over the disputed ancestral properties.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Will revocation suspicious circumstances Hindu Succession Act ancestral property

Union of India & Ors. v. Shri Sukhvinder

27 Aug 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:6636-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Tribunal's order reinstating a Postal Assistant terminated without departmental enquiry based on unproved signature discrepancies.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant termination of service departmental enquiry signature mismatch FSL report

Bhupender Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

27 Aug 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:6637-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging cancellation of provisional selection due to non-fulfillment of prescribed experience and submission of incorrect information, upholding the Tribunal's order.

administrative petition_dismissed provisional selection experience certificate recruitment rules incorrect information

Prachi Joshi v. Shailender Adhikari

27 Aug 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:6654-DB

The Delhi High Court held that Family Courts have jurisdiction under Section 26 of the DV Act to entertain reliefs even during pending divorce proceedings and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

family appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 26 DV Act Family Court jurisdiction Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Dr. Neena Raizada v. Medical Council of India

27 Aug 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:6656-DB

The Delhi High Court held that issuing a certificate without examining a patient constitutes professional misconduct under Regulation 8.[2], allowing the Medical Council discretion to impose warnings rather than mandatory removal from the medical register.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Medical Council Regulations Professional misconduct Medical certificate Removal from medical register

Sudip Kohli v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

27 Aug 2024 · Acting Chief Justice Manmohan; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:6657-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking police protection to construct a boundary wall on disputed property, directing the appellant to pursue civil remedies instead.

civil appeal_dismissed police protection boundary wall ownership documents writ jurisdiction

Hyundai Motor India Limited v. AAA Teleshoping Pvt. Ltd.

27 Aug 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:6663

The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's trademark registration for 'ELANTRA' in Class 11, holding it infringed the petitioner's prior registered and continuously used identical mark under Section 11(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant trademark registration prior adoption passing off unfair competition

Mankind Pharma Limited v. Maa Ayurved Bhavan

27 Aug 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:6666

The court granted permanent injunction against the defendant for trademark and copyright infringement of 'MANFORCE' but held the roadside vendor defendant not liable for damages due to lack of connection with the infringing entity.

civil appeal_allowed Trademark infringement Copyright infringement Permanent injunction Artistic work

Abbott GmbH & Anr. v. Mankind Pharma Limited & Anr.

27 Aug 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:6669

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against defendants' use of a trade dress deceptively similar to plaintiffs', allowing disposal of existing stock under court directions and recognizing defendants' undertaking to adopt a new trade dress.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off trade dress permanent injunction

Sanjay Kumar Tiwari v. Government of NCT of Delhi

27 Aug 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:6651

The High Court set aside a conviction judgment that was not pronounced in open court and was prepared after the original was lost, remanding the case for fresh judgment in accordance with Section 353 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 353 CrPC judgment pronouncement conviction validity non-delivery of judgment