Delhi High Court

31,373 judgments

Year:

S Chand and Company Ltd v. Preeti Agarwal & Ors.

28 Jul 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:2869

The Delhi High Court approved a settlement restraining defendants from using the author's name and branding in competing publications, enforcing publishing agreement terms and preventing misleading representations.

civil settled Significant publishing agreement right of first refusal negative covenant copyright infringement

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd v. The Chief Commissioner, Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities

28 Jul 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:2849

The Delhi High Court held that the Chief Commissioner under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 cannot issue binding directions for retrospective promotions, and such orders are only recommendatory.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Chief Commissioner Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 Section 75 jurisdiction

Bakshi Mohemmed Riyazuddin v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

28 Jul 2022 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:2863

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under the Arms Act against a petitioner for mere possession of ammunition without conscious knowledge, emphasizing that conscious possession is essential for criminal liability under the Arms Act.

criminal petition_allowed Significant conscious possession Arms Act, 1959 ammunition possession quashing of FIR

Om Prakash Arora v. Meenakshi Sardana & Ors.

28 Jul 2022 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:2840

The Delhi High Court vacated an ex-parte injunction restraining co-owners from dealing with their majority shares in a property, holding that a plaintiff claiming a minor undivided share must prove possession and cannot fetter others' rights without satisfying the trinity test.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex-parte injunction undivided share constructive possession Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC

EVERSUB INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

28 Jul 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:2928-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a defective CGST summons lacking a DIN and proper addressee, emphasizing adherence to binding circulars and procedural safeguards in summons issuance.

administrative petition_allowed Significant summons Document Identification Number DIN CGST

Union of India v. Sandeep Singh

28 Jul 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Court held that approved service for LDCE appointees starts from the vacancy year, disallowed arbitrary withholding of vacancies, but cautioned against affecting seniority of non-parties without proper adjudication.

administrative other Significant approved service Limited Departmental Competitive Examination Section Officer seniority

Subhash Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Jul 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:2873-DB

The Delhi High Court directed maintenance of status quo for officers posted in the Bureau of Immigration pending Tribunal's consideration of their interim relief applications, holding that absorption cannot be denied solely on the basis of their posting.

administrative petition_allowed Significant absorption policy Bureau of Immigration interim relief status quo

Kiran Kumar Sethi v. Manohar Lal Sethi & Others

28 Jul 2022 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:2896

The Delhi High Court dismissed applications challenging a partition decree, holding that legal heirs of settled parties cannot set aside decrees under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC and purchasers pendente lite cannot be impleaded after final adjudication.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Partition suit Lis pendens

Raj Rani v. Sumitra Parashar

28 Jul 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2837
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the trial court's closure of evidence due to deliberate delay but allowed limited liberty to seek permission to lead remaining witnesses' evidence.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 closure of evidence deliberate delay superintending jurisdiction

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-20 v. Suman Agarwal

28 Jul 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:2945-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order dismissing additions under Section 153A in absence of incriminating material found during search, holding that statements alone do not justify reassessment in a completed assessment year.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 132 Section 153A Section 10(38)

Samarth Narang v. Union of India through Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.

28 Jul 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:2898-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal to relax stringent conditions imposed for suspension of a Look Out Circular, balancing travel rights with creditor interests in pending civil recovery proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Look Out Circular personal guarantee wilful defaulter travel restrictions

M/S K.B.G ENGINEERS v. DELHI TOURISM & TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.

28 Jul 2022 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:2859

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that procedural objections and limitation issues are to be decided by the arbitral tribunal, not at the appointment stage.

other petition_allowed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator arbitrable dispute

Salma Tyagi v. State

28 Jul 2022 · Anu Malhotra · 2022:DHC:2835

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to Salma Tyagi in a rape and forced abortion case, applying the parity principle and finding no necessity for custodial interrogation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 376 IPC Section 6 POCSO Act parity principle

Tarun Adarsh v. Union of India

28 Jul 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:3043

The Delhi High Court held that a student who exited an integrated Ph.D. programme after two years without completing the entire course or additional research is not entitled to an MS degree absent enabling institutional regulations.

administrative petition_dismissed Integrated Ph.D. programme Master of Science degree Exit policy Indian Institute of Science Education and Research

Somany Ceramics Limited v. Shri Ganesh Electric Co. & Ors.

28 Jul 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:2963

The Delhi High Court held that while concurrent trademark registrations confer concurrent rights, the prior user with goodwill can claim passing off against another registrant, granting interim injunction to Somany Ceramics against Defendants' use of 'SOMANY' on water heaters/geysers.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Prior user rights Concurrent trademark registration

Indira Uppal v. Union of India & Anr.

28 Jul 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:2943-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the definition of 'relative' under the Senior Citizens Act cannot be imported into the Income Tax Act to claim exemption from gift tax, dismissing the petition seeking such relief.

tax petition_dismissed Significant relative definition Senior Citizens Act Income Tax Act gift tax exemption

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-20 v. Shiv Kumar Agarwal

28 Jul 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:2946-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order dismissing additions to LTCG income in the absence of incriminating material found during search, holding that completed assessments cannot be reopened under Section 153A without such material.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 132 Section 153A Long Term Capital Gains

Zeeshan Khan v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

28 Jul 2022 · Anu Malhotra · 2022:DHC:2834

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to the accused in a rape case involving a minor victim under the POCSO Act, emphasizing the victim's age and gravity of allegations.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail rape minor POCSO Act

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-20 v. Kavita Agarwal

28 Jul 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:2947-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that in the absence of incriminating material found during search, statements alone cannot justify reopening completed assessments under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 132 Section 153A Long Term Capital Gains

Piyush Kumar Dutt v. Vishal Mega Mart Private Limited

28 Jul 2022 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:2858

The Delhi High Court held that disputes relating to employee stock options under an Employment Agreement containing annexures with an arbitration clause are arbitrable and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Employment Agreement Employee Stock Option Plan