Delhi High Court

71,423 judgments

Year:

M/S. UNICON ENGINEERS v. M/S. JINDAL STEEL AND POWER LTD.

26 Jul 2022 · Prateek Jalan · 2022:DHC:2821

The Delhi High Court held that an order passed by the MSME Facilitation Council after failed conciliation without initiating arbitration is not an arbitral award and thus not executable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant MSMED Act Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council conciliation arbitration

Chetan Singh Yadav & Ors. v. Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation & Ors.

26 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:2817

The Delhi High Court directed maintenance of status quo in petitioners' service conditions during the pendency of industrial dispute proceedings under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

labor petition_allowed Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 status quo service conditions

Directorate General of Trade Remedies v. Jindal Saw

25 Jul 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:2782-DB

The Delhi High Court held that appeals against Tribunal orders on continuation or cessation of anti-dumping duty are maintainable under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, as such decisions do not directly relate to determination of rate of duty.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant anti-dumping duty sunset review Customs Act, 1962 Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Easy Trip Planners Ltd v. One97 Communications Ltd

25 Jul 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2779
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that interlocutory orders of an arbitral tribunal not appealable under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act cannot be challenged under Article 227, mandating parties to await the final award for grievances.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitral tribunal interlocutory order Article 227 judicial intervention

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -6 v. Nilgiri Financial Consultants Ltd.

25 Jul 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:2786-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT order allowing deduction for bad debts written off under Section 36(1)(vii) read with Section 36(2) of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed bad debts deduction Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 36(1)(vii)

Rakesh Nagpal v. Usha Rani

25 Jul 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:3085

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the setting aside of an ex parte order due to invalid service of summons on a minor, affirming the trial court's order under Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction.

civil petition_dismissed service of summons Order V Rule 15 CPC Order IX Rule 7 CPC ex parte order

Ajay Kumar Patnaik v. Jawahar Lal Nehru University

25 Jul 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:2785

The Delhi High Court held that terminal benefits cannot be withheld without initiated or concluded disciplinary proceedings and directed JNU to release the petitioner's benefits forthwith.

administrative petition_allowed Significant terminal benefits pension withholding disciplinary proceedings government servant

Anil Samaniya v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Jul 2022 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:2857

The Delhi High Court dismissed a retired police officer's petition for police protection post-retirement, holding that security cover decisions rest with competent State authorities based on threat assessments.

administrative petition_dismissed police protection threat perception retired police officer security cover

PR. CIT -1, DELHI v. M/S. CRYSTAL CROP PROTECTION PVT. LTD

25 Jul 2022 · MANMOHAN; MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA · 2022:DHC:2774-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order deleting Section 14A disallowance where no exempt income was earned, allowed subsidy as capital receipt, and dismissed the department's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 14A Income Tax Act disallowance exempt income capital receipt

Ramji Yadav v. Ashish Yadav

25 Jul 2022 · Gaurang Kanth, J. · 2022:DHC:3021

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a registered Will executed by Late Bachchu Ram Yadav, dismissing the appellant's challenge of forgery and confirming the respondent's entitlement to the disputed property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Will execution Indian Succession Act Section 63 Evidence Act Section 68 registered Will

Paras Grover v. State; Sunny Tanwar v. State

25 Jul 2022 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:5976

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners accused under Sections 354/354B/34 IPC, holding that custodial interrogation was unnecessary and considering the underlying property dispute affecting the complaint's credibility.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 354 IPC Section 354B IPC Section 34 IPC

Skylink Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Sachin Mittal

25 Jul 2022 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2022:DHC:2796

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to set aside an ex parte decree under Order XXXVII CPC, holding that valid email service and failure to show special circumstances justified the decree against Defendant No.1.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC ex parte decree service of summons by email memorandum of understanding

Sh Vijay Kumar Jain (Since Deceased Through Lrs) Madhu Jain & Ors. v. Suresh Kumar Jain

25 Jul 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2829

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a decree on admissions application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC in a tenancy dispute, emphasizing the necessity of clear admissions and protecting the defendant's right to trial where substantial disputes exist.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC decree on admissions Delhi Rent Control Act 1958 tenancy agreement

Surender Singh Hooda v. Union of India and Ors.

25 Jul 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:2756-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld recovery of expenditure from a BSF officer who failed to complete a sponsored diploma course, rejecting his claim for waiver despite change of venue and hard posting.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant bond liability PGDPPM voluntary retirement dissertation completion

Gopi Chand v. Vijay Kapoor

25 Jul 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2827

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing amendment of the plaint to correct FIR details and rejecting dismissal of a malicious prosecution suit at the threshold, emphasizing the need to decide real controversies over procedural technicalities.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order VI Rule 17 CPC Order VII Rule 11 CPC Order VII Rule 14 CPC amendment of plaint

Dr. Jagmohan Singh Chawla v. Jaspal Singh Chawla

25 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:2823
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the Trial Court's refusal to admit medical and FIR documents to prove mental incapacity affecting the validity of a gift deed, holding that the revisional jurisdiction could not be invoked without jurisdictional error.

civil appeal_dismissed Section 151 CPC gift deed validity mental incapacity revisional jurisdiction

Sumitra Devi v. Ram Niwas Dagar & Anr

25 Jul 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2826

The High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to delete or modify a key issue in a land possession suit, leaving it to the trial court to decide whether the issue can be tried as a preliminary issue.

civil other Procedural Order XIV Rule 5 CPC modification of issues preliminary issue specific performance

Tata Capital Limited v. M/S Aryan Pharma

23 Jul 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6595

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court’s role is limited to verifying the arbitration agreement and cannot examine merits or defenses at this stage.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Arbitration agreement

Vikram Solanki@Monu v. State NCT of Delhi

22 Jul 2022 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2022:DHC:5975

Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused in a forcible entry and assault case under IPC Sections 452, 323, 392, 506, and 427, imposing conditions to safeguard investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. assault forcible entry

C.P. Singh v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board

22 Jul 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:2890

The Delhi High Court set aside a disciplinary penalty imposed without supplying the CVC advice to the petitioner, holding that failure to provide such material violates natural justice and mandates a reasoned, fair hearing before imposing punishment.

administrative petition_allowed Significant natural justice disciplinary proceedings Central Vigilance Commission advice disagreement with inquiry report