Delhi High Court

71,423 judgments

Year:

M/S. NULON INDIA LTD. v. ISHWAR INDUSTRIES LTD.

21 Jul 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:2880

The Delhi High Court held the appellant's directors guilty of contempt for making false statements to delay execution of a possession decree, accepted their apologies subject to payment, and dismissed their objections as barred by res judicata.

civil petition_allowed Significant contempt of court false statements Order XXI Rule 97 CPC res judicata

M/S SPC ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. v. ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

21 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:2812
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that appeals against orders under Sections 8B to 8G of the Employees Provident Fund Act are not maintainable before the Tribunal as per Section 7I, dismissing the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's rejection of such appeal.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Employees Provident Fund Act appeal maintainability Section 7I Sections 8B to 8G

Murari Lal Sharma v. Dharmender Kumar

21 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:2811

The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of five civil suits from Tis Hazari Courts to Dwarka Courts based on changed territorial jurisdiction and parties' residence.

civil appeal_allowed transfer petition territorial jurisdiction civil suits court jurisdiction

Stellar Information Technology Private Ltd v. Chandan Kumar Chaudhary

21 Jul 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2720

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's order on affidavit exhibition and disallowance of questions, expunging an unwarranted warning to counsel, and held that such procedural matters lie within the trial court's discretion.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India Order XIX Rule 3 CPC affidavit exhibition argumentative affidavit

PCIT (Central)-3, New Delhi v. Sunway Realtech Pvt. Ltd.

21 Jul 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:2751-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that reassessment under Sections 153A and 153C requires incriminating material linking seized documents to undisclosed income, which was absent in this case.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153A Income Tax Act Section 153C Income Tax Act incriminating material search and seizure

Vikas Singhal v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi

21 Jul 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:2735-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an assessee has a mandatory right to personal hearing under Section 144B(7)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, and denial thereof renders the assessment order invalid, mandating remand for fresh hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant personal hearing Section 144B(7)(vii) Income Tax Act, 1961 quasi-judicial discretion

Shivan Ramachandran & Anr. v. Madhur Sharma

21 Jul 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:2745

The Delhi High Court decreed the plaintiffs' trademark infringement suit based on the defendant's undertaking to withdraw trademark applications and cease use, granting relief including refund of court fees.

civil appeal_allowed trademark infringement withdrawal of trademark application domain name undertaking

Novi Digital Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. v. W1.123MOVIES11.COM & Ors.

21 Jul 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:2717

The Delhi High Court granted an injunction and directed blocking of rogue websites to prevent unauthorized online streaming of the film 'The Big Bull,' affirming the protection of exclusive digital and theatrical rights under the Copyright Act.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant Copyright Act, 1957 digital rights theatrical rights injunction

Chander Bhushan v. State, NCT of Delhi

21 Jul 2022 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

Delhi High Court quashed FIR and complaint under Section 188 IPC as the alleged disobedience predated the effective date of the preventive order, holding no offence was made out.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 188 IPC Section 144 CrPC quashment of FIR competence under Section 195 CrPC

Rameshwar @ Ranu v. State

21 Jul 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal · 2022:DHC:2716-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, rejecting claims of intoxication and sudden fight, based on consistent ocular, medical, and forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder intention to kill intoxication

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. v. VISHAL RANA AND ORS.

21 Jul 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:2777-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed as infructuous a writ petition challenging recruitment conditions after the authority relaxed the conditions and appointed the concerned respondent.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition infructuous relaxation of conditions appointment

M/S ANKUSH AUTO DEALS v. COMMISSIONER OF DGST & ANR

21 Jul 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:2910-DB

The Delhi High Court held that statutory interest under Section 56 of the CGST Act, 2017 is payable on delayed refunds despite Covid-19 related delays, directing the revenue to pay interest to the petitioner.

tax petition_allowed Significant statutory interest refund Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 56

DB Corp Ltd v. Shailja Naqvi

21 Jul 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2764
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the Limitation Act applies to appeals under the Sexual Harassment Act, allowing condonation of delay, and upheld the Industrial Tribunal's order condoning a 36-day delay in filing such an appeal.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act Section 18 appeal Limitation Act Section 5 condonation of delay

Ram Swaroop Radhey Shyam v. Ajay Shukla

21 Jul 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2765
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the Rent Controller's rejection of the tenant's applications to introduce subsequent events and additional documents after orders were reserved, affirming that bona fide need for eviction is assessed as of the eviction petition date.

property petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) eviction petition bona fide need

Shivalaya Construction Co Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Value Added Tax

21 Jul 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:2800-DB

The Delhi High Court reduced the pre-deposit requirement from 10% to 5% in a VAT appeal involving remand powers and limitation period issues, allowing the appeal to proceed on merits without granting a complete waiver.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 Section 74 Section 34 Objection Hearing Authority

Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd v. Union of India

21 Jul 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:2895-DB

The Delhi High Court held that revenue demands not included in an NCLT-approved resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code stand extinguished, allowing the writ petition and quashing the impugned order imposing such demand.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Resolution plan Extinguishment of claims National Company Law Tribunal

Rajender Singh v. Ravinder

21 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:2810

The Delhi High Court reduced the deposit amount required for conditional leave to defend in a loan suit, balancing the petitioner's financial incapacity with the respondent's interest.

civil appeal_allowed conditional leave to defend deposit condition loan dispute financial incapacity

Vivek Bharadwaj & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

20 Jul 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:3005

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving Sections 406, 498A, 377, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that even offences under Section 377 IPC can be quashed in such private disputes under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 377 IPC matrimonial dispute

Jitender Kumar v. Jaspal Kaur Public School

20 Jul 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:2705-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld that compliance with Section 25F(c) of the Industrial Disputes Act in retrenchment matters, once adjudicated, cannot be re-litigated, dismissing appeals challenging retrenchment of employees of minority schools.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Section 25F(c) Industrial Disputes Act retrenchment res judicata minority educational institutions

Jitender Kumar v. Jaspal Kaur Public School

20 Jul 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:2706-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the finality of compliance with Section 25F(c) of the Industrial Disputes Act in retrenchment disputes involving minority educational institutions, dismissing appeals challenging prior adjudications.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Section 25F(c) Industrial Disputes Act retrenchment res judicata minority educational institutions