Delhi High Court

29,282 judgments

Year:

Bennet, Coleman and Company Ltd v. Fashion One Television LLC

19 Aug 2013 · C. Hari Shankar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the respondent's trademark registrations containing the dominant element "NOW" in Class 38 infringe the petitioner's "NOW" family of marks and ordered their removal from the register.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act 1999 Section 17 anti-dissection rule family of marks

Vardhman Precision Profiles v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd

05 Aug 2013 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6237
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting claims as non-arbitrable due to failure to comply with contractual notification requirements, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Notified claims Pre-arbitral protocol

Asha Rani Gupta v. Ravindera Memorial Public School & Anr

06 Jun 2013 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7903-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that dismissal of a private school employee without prior approval of the Directorate of Education is void, and ex post facto approval cannot validate such dismissal.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 prior approval dismissal of employee jurisdictional defect

Indian Council of Agricultural Research and Anr v. Sushila and Anr

25 Apr 2013 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7608-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting family pension to the widow of a casual laborer, affirming that long service in casual capacity is deemed permanent for pension benefits.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant family pension casual laborer regularization pensionary benefits

AB Mauri India Private Limited v. Vicky Aggarwal & Ors.

20 Mar 2013 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:1923

The Delhi High Court granted an interlocutory injunction restraining defendants from using the mark 'TOWER' for dry fruits, enforcing a prior undertaking and finding prima facie trademark infringement under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trade Mark Interlocutory Injunction Undertaking Promissory Estoppel

Charanjit Kaur v. Guru Harkrishan Public School

06 Mar 2013 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:57

The Delhi High Court directed the school to pay arrears and terminal benefits under the 6th and 7th CPC to the petitioner’s late husband’s estate with interest, affirming statutory entitlement and timelines for compliance.

labor petition_allowed Significant 6th Central Pay Commission 7th Central Pay Commission arrears of salary gratuity

Daljeet Kaur Bindra & Ors. v. Directorate of Education & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:314

The Delhi High Court directed an unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears with interest, and pay terminal benefits to serving and retired employees, affirming their entitlement under law and prior judgments.

labor petition_allowed Significant 6th Central Pay Commission 7th Central Pay Commission unaided minority schools pay arrears

Jasneet Kaur & Ors. v. Directorate of Education & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:318

The Delhi High Court directed unaided private school employees to be paid arrears and terminal benefits as per 6th and 7th CPC recommendations with interest, affirming their entitlement under law and prior judgments.

labor appeal_allowed Significant 6th Central Pay Commission 7th Central Pay Commission arrears of salary unaided private schools

Sudha Katoch v. Directorate of Education

06 Mar 2013 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:320

Delhi High Court directs unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears with interest, and pay terminal benefits to serving and retired employees in line with statutory and judicial mandates.

labor appeal_allowed Significant 6th Central Pay Commission 7th Central Pay Commission unaided minority schools arrears of salary

Maninder Kaur Sawhney v. Education Department & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:750

The Delhi High Court held that employees of unaided minority schools are entitled to salary revision and arrears as per the 7th CPC and directed payment of arrears with interest, while confirming the statutory gratuity ceiling.

labor petition_allowed Significant 7th Central Pay Commission unaided minority schools salary revision gratuity

Raghuvinder Kaur Grover v. Directorate of Education & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:950

The Delhi High Court directed an unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears and terminal benefits with interest, affirming employees' entitlement to pay parity with government schools.

labor petition_allowed Significant 6th Central Pay Commission 7th Central Pay Commission unaided minority schools pay parity

Rakesh Kumar Bhagat & Ors. v. Guru Harkishan Public School & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:9575

The Delhi High Court held that recognized private unaided minority schools are statutorily bound under Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 to implement 6th and 7th Pay Commission recommendations and pay arrears to their employees, rejecting claims of exemption based on minority status or financial constraints.

labor petition_allowed Significant Section 10(1) Delhi School Education Act 6th Pay Commission 7th Pay Commission unaided minority schools

Coral Telecom Ltd v. Elcom Innovations Private Limited

01 Feb 2013 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2022:DHC:4837

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator, holding that no valid arbitration agreement exists between Coral Telecom and Elcom Innovations Pvt. Ltd. under the MoUs invoked.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Memorandum of Understanding Arbitration clause

Union of India and Anr v. Syed Sajid Ali

15 Jan 2013 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1246-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 19

The Court held that the effective date of suspension is the date of issuance of the order with immediate effect, and suspension extensions granted after 90 days without prior review are invalid, dismissing the Union of India's writ petition.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant suspension effective date CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 Rule 10(6) and (7) extension of suspension

Fateh Singh Chauhan v. Union of India

30 Nov 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:706-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 12

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the petitioner was barred by res judicata from seeking second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme after earlier tribunal and court decisions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme financial upgradation promotion res judicata

Manish Saini v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Another

08 Nov 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8452-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a police recruitment appointment based on the Screening Committee’s lawful assessment that an acquittal on benefit of doubt does not guarantee suitability for service in a disciplined force.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant acquittal honourable acquittal benefit of doubt Screening Committee

HPCL-Mittal Pipeline Limited v. Coastal Marine Construction and Engineering

31 Oct 2012 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:3290

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for breach of natural justice where the tribunal ignored the respondent's defence without adequate notice or opportunity, emphasizing the need for fair procedure in arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 natural justice Statement of Defence para-wise denial

Animesh Rastogi, Vibhav Singh, Rajat Dubey and Shashank Pandey v. 658200 EX WO Raj Kishor Singh

18 Oct 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3112-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service-attributable disability and the limited scope of writ jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Gold Cause Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Anand Prakash Gupta

17 Oct 2012 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3374
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court is considering whether the executing court exceeded its jurisdiction by directing possession of shops differing in number and area from those decreed in a specific performance suit.

civil other specific performance execution of decree shop number specific area specific

Sanjeev Sharma v. The State

11 Sep 2012 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:475
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of a criminal case from Saket Court to Patiala House Courts based on territorial jurisdiction as per government notification.

criminal appeal_allowed transfer petition territorial jurisdiction Patiala House Courts Munirka