Delhi High Court

95,726 judgments

Year:

M/S ARRENA OVERSEAS PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S BATRA ART PRESS

28 Oct 2022 · Amit Bansal · 2022:DHC:4477
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's summary possession application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, holding that disputed ownership and lease validity issues in a family-owned company require trial and cannot be decided on admissions alone.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC summary judgment lease agreement validity family-owned company

Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd & Anr. v. Maruti Metals & Anr.

28 Oct 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:4565

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction protecting the well-known 'AMUL' trademark against identical use by a defendant on cookware, allowing interim use of 'AMULYA' pending final trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant AMUL trademark well-known mark trademark infringement interim injunction

Medeor Hospital Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-04 & Ors.

28 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4502-DB

The Delhi High Court held that appeals filed but barred by limitation or admitted after the specified date are still 'pending' under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, invalidating CBDT's FAQ-59 condition requiring prior admission for settlement eligibility.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 pending appeal limitation period condonation of delay

Neha v. Union of India and Ors.

28 Oct 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:4547-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging CISF's medical fitness criteria based on BMI, holding that courts will not interfere with Armed Forces' selection standards absent exceptional circumstances.

administrative petition_dismissed medical fitness BMI sports quota CISF recruitment

Shreysha Textiles Pvt. Ltd. v. Viss Incorporation & Ors.

28 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4497
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that parties against whom specific allegations of fraud and conspiracy are made cannot be deleted from a suit under Order I Rule 10 CPC without trial on merits, setting aside the lower court's order deleting such parties.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order I Rule 10 CPC necessary parties agency liability fraud and conspiracy

University of Delhi v. Adil Sajeer Ansari

28 Oct 2022 · SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA; SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD · 2022:DHC:4510-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the University's appeal, holding that a candidate's failure to submit admission documents within the prescribed deadline due to his own mistake does not warrant judicial intervention to grant admission or compensation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant admission deadline university admission judicial interference academic finality

KRBL Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 13-1 & Ors.

28 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4542-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Revenue to pass appeal effect orders and refund Rs.38.35 crore with interest to KRBL Limited following an ITAT order in its favor.

tax petition_allowed Income Tax Appellate Tribunal appeal effect order refund of tax interest on refund

IDBI Bank Ltd. v. Sujit Das Gupta

28 Oct 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; V. Kameswar Rao

The Delhi High Court allowed IDBI Bank's review petitions, condoned delay, and held that there is no right to legal representation before the Wilful Defaulter Committee following the Supreme Court's ruling.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Wilful Defaulter Committee legal representation in-house proceedings personal hearing

Radical Arc Ventures Pvt Ltd v. State NCT of Delhi

28 Oct 2022 · Jasmeet Singh, J · 2022:DHC:4486

The Delhi High Court held that a company is not a party under the Domestic Violence Act and ordered the return of its car wrongly retained in matrimonial dispute proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act corporate veil separate legal entity Section 482 CrPC

Ajay Gupta v. State CBI

28 Oct 2022 · Anu Malhotra · 2022:DHC:4498

The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction of a Sub-Inspector under the Prevention of Corruption Act, holding that credible alibi evidence and procedural lapses created reasonable doubt about his guilt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 Section 13(1)(d) Section 13(2)

Union of India v. Ram Roop Meena & Ors.

28 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:9660-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order rejecting recovery of LTC amounts from employees on the ground of unauthorized ticket purchase, holding that absent allegations or proof of fraud, recovery is unjustified.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Leave Travel Concession Recovery of amounts Fraud and forgery Executive orders

Surinder Singh and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.

27 Oct 2022 · Sanjeey Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:5923-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the valid termination of the LARSGESS Scheme, denying petitioners a second chance in the aptitude test and appointment, as the Scheme violated Article 16 and no vested rights arose under it.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant LARSGESS Scheme Article 16 termination of scheme backdoor entry

Rahul Bhardwaj v. Union of India

27 Oct 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:4453-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with arrears to the petitioner for his past Indian Air Force service, subject to eligibility, in line with applicable rules and precedents.

administrative petition_allowed Significant pro-rata pension Indian Air Force Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Office Memorandum 2005

Relaxo Footwears Ltd v. Aqualite India Ltd

27 Oct 2022 · Vibhu Bahkru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:4461-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed Relaxo's appeal, holding that the registered footwear design was prima facie novel and original, and reinstated the interim injunction against Aqualite for design infringement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Designs Act, 2000 Section 4 Designs Act Novelty and originality Interim injunction

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central -3 v. Sh. Trilok Chand Choudhary

27 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4608-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of a Rs. 20 crore addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, finding no connection between the Assessee and the disputed MOU or cash transaction.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 68 Income Tax Act unexplained cash credit Memorandum of Understanding search and seizure

Guljari Harijan & Ors. v. M/S Shri Ram General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.

27 Oct 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:4570
Cites 7 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking dismissal of a compensation claim under the Employees’ Compensation Act, holding that withdrawal without liberty does not bar a fresh claim and emphasizing the necessity of reasoned judicial orders.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 claim petition res judicata non-speaking order

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-I v. Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd.

27 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4690-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of transfer pricing adjustments on AMP expenditure and Section 14A disallowance for AYs 2012-13 and 2013-14, holding no international transaction existed for AMP expenses and no exempt income was earned.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Advertisement Marketing and Promotion expenditure Transfer Pricing Section 14A disallowance Bright Line Test

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd. v. Jagjit Singh & Anr.

27 Oct 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeals, upholding the motor accident compensation award based on negligence established by preponderance of probabilities and proper income assessment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim negligence preponderance of probabilities charge sheet

Kamdhenu Enterprises Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer Ward 14-2, Delhi & Ors.

27 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4597-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a second reassessment notice under Section 148 cannot be issued during pendency of reassessment proceedings and quashed the assessment order for non-disposal of objections and violation of natural justice.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act reassessment notice principles of natural justice disposal of objections

Sanjay Chadha Trading as M/s Eveready Tools Emporium v. Union of India & Ors.

27 Oct 2022 · Vibhu Bakhru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:4457-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of the appellant's 'EVEREADY' trademark registration, holding it was dishonestly adopted in violation of the respondent's well-known trademark rights under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant well-known trademark Trade Marks Act, 1999 dishonest adoption assignment deed