Delhi High Court

95,726 judgments

Year:

The Workman v. The Management of M/S Jai Prakash Associates Pvt. Ltd.

31 Oct 2022 · Gaurang Kanth · 2022:DHC:4627

The Delhi High Court held that part of the cause of action arising in Delhi makes the Government of NCT of Delhi the appropriate government under the Industrial Disputes Act, setting aside the Labour Court's award for lack of jurisdiction and remanding the matter for adjudication.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 appropriate government territorial jurisdiction cause of action

Shiv Raj Singh v. Allied Blenders & Distillers Pvt. Ltd.

31 Oct 2022 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld summoning of partners under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonour of cheques, holding that specific averments in the complaint suffice to fasten vicarious criminal liability and quashing under Section 482 CrPC requires strong evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC partnership firm liability

Geetanjali Studio Private Limited v. Rahul Mamtani

31 Oct 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:4612

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to the Plaintiff against an ex-franchisee for unauthorized use of the registered trademark 'GEETANJALI' post-termination of the franchise agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement franchise agreement non-exclusive license permanent injunction

Aman Sharma & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

31 Oct 2022 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2022:DHC:4518

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR for trespass and damage to public property as the land acquisition proceedings had been declared lapsed under Section 24(2) of the LARR Act, rendering the criminal case an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 24(2) LARR Act 2013 land acquisition lapse Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR

Ved Yadav v. State

31 Oct 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal · 2022:DHC:4507-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Ved Yadav for murder and assault, affirming the special evidentiary value of injured eyewitness testimony and rejecting minor contradictions in prosecution evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant injured witness testimony identification of accused Section 302 IPC Section 324 IPC

Brij Mohan Rasiwasia v. Butna Devi

31 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4491
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal, holding that the eviction suit was barred under the Delhi Rent Control Act due to low rent and that the respondent failed to prove landlord-tenant relationship or entitlement to arrears, setting aside the eviction decree.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 50 DRC Act landlord-tenant relationship rent receipts

Rakesh Bisht v. Union of India and Ors.

31 Oct 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:4605-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging non-recognition of a privately obtained computer qualification for promotion, leaving the issue to be decided by the Tribunal where it was already pending.

administrative petition_dismissed promotion Assistant Computer Programmer Statistical Analysis System qualification recognition

Geeta Sharma v. Public Enterprises Selection Board & Anr.

31 Oct 2022 · Rekha Palli · Citation No.2022/DHC/004563

The Delhi High Court held that preference to Chartered Accountants in a PSU selection advertisement does not override PESB guidelines giving priority to higher pay scale and Board level status, quashing the impugned shortlist excluding the petitioner.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Public Enterprises Selection Board shortlisting preference to Chartered Accountant Board level appointment

L&T Hydrocarbon Engineering Limited v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited

31 Oct 2022 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2022:DHC:4531

The Delhi High Court held that only claims certified as 'Notified Claims' by the General Manager are arbitrable under the contract, upheld the validity of the panel nomination procedure for arbitrator appointment, and remanded the matter to the General Manager for certification before arbitration can proceed.

arbitration remanded Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Notified Claims General Manager's decision Arbitrability

S K Bhalla v. Parveen Jain

31 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4578
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside dismissal of a landlord's suit for rent arrears, holding that disputed facts require trial and a plaint cannot be rejected without proper procedure under CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant cause of action Order VII Rule 11 CPC surrender of tenancy de-sealing of premises

Gangotri Enterprises Ltd v. General Manager Northern Railways

31 Oct 2022 · Mini Pushkarna
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court held that arbitrators appointed from a limited panel of retired Railway officers are ineligible under amended Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act, and appointed the respondent’s nominee arbitrator to ensure an impartial arbitral tribunal.

other appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12(5) Seventh Schedule Independence and impartiality of arbitrators

Sunil Kumar v. The State NCT of Delhi

31 Oct 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal · 2022:DHC:4504-DB

SUPREME KNITTING & GENERAL MILLS v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT, DELHI)

31 Oct 2022 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2022:DHC:4668
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the dismissal of the protest petition against the police closure report in a trademark dispute, affirming that criminal proceedings cannot substitute civil remedies where the trademark is registered and protected by injunction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Trademark infringement Copyright Act Trade Mark Act Police closure report

Mahendra Rana v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr

31 Oct 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:4593

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking directions for acquisition or passage over landlocked property, holding that easementary rights require civil adjudication and the petitioner’s representation was duly considered and rejected.

property petition_dismissed land acquisition right of way easementary rights Indian Easements Act 1882

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd v. Sunita Devi & Ors.

31 Oct 2022 · Gaurang Kanth · 2022:DHC:4626

Delhi High Court modified motor accident compensation by upholding 10% contributory negligence, recognizing dependency of deceased’s father, and applying Supreme Court principles from Pranay Sethi and Sarla Verma.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim contributory negligence dependency future prospects

Vineet@Kala v. The State of Delhi

31 Oct 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal · 2022:DHC:4506-DB

Vijay Saini @ Ram Singh v. State

31 Oct 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal · 2022:DHC:4503-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including admissible disclosure under Section 27 of the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 27 Indian Evidence Act circumstantial evidence doctrine of confirmation

Col. A. K Arora v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.

31 Oct 2022 · Sachin Datta, J. · 2022:DHC:4534

The Delhi High Court set aside DDA's arbitrary cancellation of allotment and directed restoration of the plot allotment, emphasizing the authority's duty to inform and act fairly when possession is impeded by court orders.

administrative petition_allowed Significant e-auction Delhi Development Authority status quo order possession

KMA Caterers v. Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation

31 Oct 2022 · Mini Pushkarna
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held that the seat of arbitration is New Delhi, has jurisdiction to appoint an independent arbitrator, and struck down the respondent's unilateral appointment procedure as impermissible under the Arbitration Act and Supreme Court precedents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration seat arbitration venue territorial jurisdiction unilateral appointment

Brij Mohan Sehgal v. Pankaj Sanghi

31 Oct 2022 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2022:DHC:4539

The Delhi High Court held that administrative transfers of Public Prosecutors and procurement of biometric attendance machines without financial irregularity do not constitute criminal offences under IPC, dismissing the petition challenging such acts.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Public Prosecutors Transfer and Posting Section 166 IPC Section 405 IPC