Delhi High Court

59,941 judgments

Year:

Rakesh Kumar Bhola v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Headquarters, New Delhi

19 Oct 2022 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2022:DHC:4413
Cites 7 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to an accused under the NDPS Act due to prolonged trial delay violating his right to speedy trial, balancing stringent bail conditions with constitutional liberty.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS bail speedy trial

KRBL LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 13(1) & ORS

19 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4419-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Revenue to pass appeal effect orders and release refunds with interest to the petitioner pursuant to the ITAT order, emphasizing statutory compliance and constitutional mandates.

tax petition_allowed Income Tax Appellate Tribunal appeal effect order refund interest

M/S DWARKESH DIAMONDS PVT LTD v. URMIL BAKSHI

19 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4482

The Delhi High Court held that leave to defend in a summary suit must be granted unless the defence is frivolous, and where the defence is plausible but improbable, conditional leave with deposit may be imposed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) CPC leave to defend summary suit plausible defence

Ram Karan v. Union of India and Anr.

19 Oct 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:4401
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that compassionate appointment is a humanitarian concession, not a right, and dismissed the petition seeking such appointment after a long delay and in absence of available vacancies.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant compassionate appointment public employment humanitarian concession vacancy

Bharat v. The State

19 Oct 2022 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2022:DHC:4418

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a POCSO case involving a minor niece, holding that consent of a minor is immaterial but bail is permissible after completion of investigation and filing of chargesheet under appropriate conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed bail Section 439 Cr.P.C. minor consent POCSO Act

Kaushalya Devi v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

19 Oct 2022 · Swarana Kanta Sharma
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discharge of accused from murder charges due to lack of prima facie evidence while affirming dowry-related charges against the husband, emphasizing the limited scope of charge framing and the need for further investigation if warranted.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charge discharge Section 302 IPC Section 304B IPC

Surjeet Kaur v. Sardar Raja Singh Oberoi & Ors.

19 Oct 2022 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:4362

The Delhi High Court held that a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is neither a necessary nor proper party in a partition suit and dismissed the application for its impleadment.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Partition Suit Impleadment SARFAESI Act, 2002 Section 34 SARFAESI

MUFG BANK LTD v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2

19 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora

The Delhi High Court directed income tax authorities to comply with ITAT and High Court orders by passing appeal effect orders and issuing refunds to MUFG Bank Ltd within six weeks.

tax petition_allowed Income Tax Appellate Tribunal appeal effect order refund Section 153(5) Income Tax Act

Bharat Construction Co Ltd v. Engineering Project India Ltd

19 Oct 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:4447

The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of arbitration-related petitions to a single court to avoid parallel proceedings and conflicting judgments.

civil other arbitration transfer of cases parallel proceedings conflicting judgments

DLF Ltd. v. Alka Gupta

19 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4501

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the NCDRC's order allowing an affidavit authorizing individual prosecution of a jointly allotted flat complaint, leaving maintainability issues open for adjudication.

consumer petition_dismissed Significant consumer complaint joint allottee maintainability affidavit

BELL SPORTS, INC. v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS

19 Oct 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:4441

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against cancellation of a trademark opposition due to alleged defective payment, holding that the Registrar must notify defects before the deadline to enable rectification and permitted fresh payment.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Opposition to trademark Demand Draft Payment defect

Anil Kumar Mehta v. Joginder Kumar Mehta & Ors.

19 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4533

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discretion in dismissing an application for decree on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, holding that no clear and unequivocal admissions existed to justify bypassing trial in a property dispute involving contested wills and gift deeds.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC decree on admissions judicial discretion will validity

Prasar Bharti v. National Brain Research Centre & Anr.

19 Oct 2022 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2022:DHC:4387

The Delhi High Court held that a validly appointed arbitrator's mandate cannot be terminated merely due to a government administrative dispute resolution mechanism and directed continuation of arbitration proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 14(1)(b) Administrative Mechanism for Resolution of Disputes AMRD

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. Pilot Industries Limited

19 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court upheld deletion of income tax additions under Section 153A, holding that statements under Section 132(4) alone do not constitute incriminating material without corroborative evidence discovered during search.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153A Income Tax Act Section 132(4) statement incriminating material search and seizure

Sher Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

19 Oct 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:4395-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an inadvertently passed administrative order and directed the respondents to reconsider the petitioner's case afresh, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

administrative petition_dismissed impugned order inadvertent order reconsideration representation

Dr. Pragya Shukla v. Union of India

19 Oct 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela

The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of candidature for medical teaching posts due to invalid teaching experience at non-recognized institutions and affirmed that candidates outside the reserve list have no right to appointment consideration.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Medical Council of India Regulations Central Health Services Rules Teaching experience eligibility Assistant Professor recruitment

Dr. Parsuram Mishra Institute of Advanced Study in Education v. National Council for Teacher Education

19 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:1252

The Delhi High Court quashed the NCTE appellate order withdrawing recognition for teacher education courses and remanded the appeal for reconsideration after considering the petitioner’s updated faculty submissions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Council for Teacher Education faculty list withdrawal of recognition appellate authority

The Indian Hotels Company Limited v. Grand Vivanta Vacations Private Limited

18 Oct 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:3909

The Delhi High Court permitted modification of a judgment to allow the defendant to change its corporate name to 'GRAND AMANTA' instead of 'GRAND VIHAN' due to RoC rejection, while confirming all other injunctions protecting the plaintiff's well-known 'VIVANTA' mark.

civil appeal_allowed trademark infringement well-known mark permanent injunction corporate name change

MIKKO VAULT LLC v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS

18 Oct 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:4440

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the trademark application for fresh examination, emphasizing the need to consider acquired distinctiveness and the mark as a whole under Sections 9 and 11 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 9 Section 11(1)(a) distinctiveness

Neelam Kochar & Anr. v. Neera Jain through LRs

18 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4382

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the direction to judgment debtors to disclose their financial status from 2006, affirming compliance with a prior binding order in execution proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed execution petition disclosure of assets judgment debtors Code of Civil Procedure