Delhi High Court
59,941 judgments
Surinder Singh and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the valid termination of the LARSGESS Scheme, denying petitioners a second chance in the aptitude test and appointment, as the Scheme violated Article 16 and no vested rights arose under it.
Rahul Bhardwaj v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with arrears to the petitioner for his past Indian Air Force service, subject to eligibility, in line with applicable rules and precedents.
Relaxo Footwears Ltd v. Aqualite India Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed Relaxo's appeal, holding that the registered footwear design was prima facie novel and original, and reinstated the interim injunction against Aqualite for design infringement.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central -3 v. Sh. Trilok Chand Choudhary
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of a Rs. 20 crore addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, finding no connection between the Assessee and the disputed MOU or cash transaction.
Guljari Harijan & Ors. v. M/S Shri Ram General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking dismissal of a compensation claim under the Employees’ Compensation Act, holding that withdrawal without liberty does not bar a fresh claim and emphasizing the necessity of reasoned judicial orders.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-I v. Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of transfer pricing adjustments on AMP expenditure and Section 14A disallowance for AYs 2012-13 and 2013-14, holding no international transaction existed for AMP expenses and no exempt income was earned.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd. v. Jagjit Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeals, upholding the motor accident compensation award based on negligence established by preponderance of probabilities and proper income assessment.
Kamdhenu Enterprises Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer Ward 14-2, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a second reassessment notice under Section 148 cannot be issued during pendency of reassessment proceedings and quashed the assessment order for non-disposal of objections and violation of natural justice.
Sanjay Chadha Trading as M/s Eveready Tools Emporium v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of the appellant's 'EVEREADY' trademark registration, holding it was dishonestly adopted in violation of the respondent's well-known trademark rights under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Khalid Kamal Faruqi v. Jamia Millia Islamia & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the post of Archivist is not equivalent to Deputy Librarian for pay scale or retirement age benefits, dismissing the petition challenging retirement at 60 years.
Poonam Malhotra v. Vishal Goel
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to independently hear and decide the petitioner’s application under Order VIII Rule 10(A)(3) CPC, emphasizing that rejection of one application does not automatically decide another.
Surinder Singh and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of the LARSGESS Scheme as violative of Article 16, denying second chances or appointments to petitioners who failed the aptitude test, and dismissed their claims for relief.
Sh. Lakhan Singh v. M/S TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking order denying liberty to file a fresh compensation claim under the Employees’ Compensation Act, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned orders and protecting employees’ statutory rights.
Manohar Talreja v. Mahesh Talreja
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal in a property dispute case in terms of a valid settlement agreement reached through mediation, leaving no issue for adjudication.
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. v. AKUMS DRUGS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED & ANR.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement suit and connected cancellation petition based on a settlement involving cessation of use, withdrawal of applications, and cancellation of registrations, leaving the well-known trademark claim open for future proceedings.
Seema & Ors. v. New India Assurance & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying minimum wages for income assessment and Supreme Court guidelines on future prospects and conventional heads, while upholding the interest rate awarded.
Ravindra Sharma & Anr v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the Municipal Corporation’s NOC for lift installation in a DDA group housing flat, holding that the consent and procedural requirements under the policy were met and no interference was warranted.
X v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that only Special Courts under POCSO have exclusive jurisdiction to quantify and award compensation to child sexual abuse survivors, mandating timely and adequate compensation with Legal Services Authorities limited to disbursal roles.
Prashant Garg v. Minions Venture Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging summons under Section 141 NI Act, holding that a director who signed a dishonoured cheque remains liable despite resignation if he continues to be involved in company affairs.