Delhi High Court
29,474 judgments
Union of India v. Harpreet & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's ruling that recovery of excess payments made over five years prior is impermissible, while adjourning the issue of pay scale reduction.
Sanjay Singh v. All India Football Federation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging interim recognition of a football association's committee as infructuous after fresh elections were held and a duly constituted executive committee assumed office.
Rajinder Singh Bhatia v. Manju Bhatia
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application for summary judgment under Order XII Rule 6 CPC due to lack of clear and unambiguous admissions by the defendant, emphasizing the discretionary nature of such relief and the necessity of a fair trial.
NDMC v. M/S SHREE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for filing objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act begins from the date of receipt of the signed arbitral award, excluding that date, and allowed the appeal setting aside the dismissal on limitation grounds.
Delhi Development Authority & Anr v. Jagminder Pal Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the DDA's appeal against an interim order directing desealing of a property pending writ petition challenging eviction, relying on the DDA's own restoration policy and deposits made by respondents.
ITC Limited v. Mahavir Singla
The Delhi High Court held that a suit based on multiple invoices and ledger accounts is not maintainable as a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC and granted the defendant unconditional leave to defend due to substantial triable issues raised.
Narender Kumar Wadhwa v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that eligibility for allotment under the Rohini Scheme is determined at application stage, not provisional allotment, and set aside DDA's cancellation of allotment based on a purportedly false affidavit affirmed before sale of alternate property.
K. P. Rao v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Sports Code's age and tenure restrictions apply to AKFI and all its State and District constituents, quashing unconstitutional amendments and directing fresh elections in compliance with the Code.
K. P. Rao v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that age and tenure restrictions under the National Sports Development Code apply to AKFI and all its State and District constituents, quashing unconstitutional amendments and directing fresh elections in compliance with the Code.
K. P. Rao v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Sports Code's age and tenure restrictions apply to AKFI and all its State and District constituents, quashing unconstitutional amendments and directing fresh elections in compliance with the Code.
Ashish Parasar & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce decree, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Yad Ram v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing reconsideration of the petitioner’s claim for alternative plot allotment after complete acquisition of his land, emphasizing procedural compliance and substantive entitlement.
Intercontinental Great Brands v. Parle Product Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the defendant's "FAB!O" mark and packaging are phonetically and visually similar to the plaintiff's "OREO" brand, granting interim injunction against the defendant for trademark infringement and passing off.
Shiv Kumar Saxena & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR registered on a Magistrate's direction, holding that premature quashing is impermissible when investigation is ongoing and allegations may be civil in nature.
Manjitpal Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking refund of security deposit paid during NEET SS counselling, holding MCC not liable for college fee disclosures and upholding the forfeiture clause for non-joining candidates.
Sachin Thakur & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi & Anr.)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled their differences and obtained a mutual consent divorce.
Shri Rakesh Kumar v. Indian Overseas Bank and Others
The Delhi High Court directed Indian Overseas Bank to consider the petitioner’s absorption as a Temporary Messenger under the 2011 Circular, holding that credible proof of continuous service entitles eligibility despite the employer’s contrary claim.
Dr Harjit Singh v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging non-selection in AIIMS recruitment as not maintainable, directing the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal for adjudication.
Sonia Verma & Ors. v. The State, National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR registration, holding that courts should not interfere with FIR registration when cognizable offences are disclosed and investigation is pending.
Pradeep Kumar @ Pradeep Jain v. The State, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving serious offences under Sections 376 and 377 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on a genuine compromise and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with caution.