Delhi High Court
29,474 judgments
Kirti Chaturvedi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to follow statutory procedures for reply and appeal against disciplinary actions and allowed complaints against officers to be decided by competent authorities.
Shahsi Kant Sharma v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending service representations within four weeks, ensuring timely administrative action.
Krishan Dayal Sharma v. Anita Kaushik
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to decide the pending application for cross-examination of a material witness under Section 151 CPC before proceeding with further evidence, emphasizing the right to fair trial.
Sh. Parveen Oberoi v. Ashwani Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the parties settled their property dispute through a binding settlement agreement reached via court-referred mediation.
Standard Chartered Bank v. Supreme Infratech Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to set aside the Trial Court's denial of cross-examination, affirming the fundamental right to cross-examine witnesses in civil proceedings subject to payment of costs.
Prime Road Solutions Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Smt Leela Sethi
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an application to reject a plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, holding that a fresh cause of action arose from lease default after an earlier settlement and decree.
Sujata Chaudhri v. Swarupa Ghosh
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement suit after the defendant agreed to cease use of impugned marks, with the plaintiff entitled to refund of court fees.
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Ali Sher Khan and Ors.
Delhi High Court partly allowed insurer's appeal in a motor accident claim, modifying negligence apportionment to 50:50 and enhancing compensation based on proper assessment of notional income and multiplier.
Anju Chellani v. Managing Committee Green Fields School
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to cross-examine a management witness on appointment letters during a disciplinary inquiry, emphasizing fair procedure and expeditious conclusion of the inquiry.
Ex-SI Mohar Pal Kardam v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the minimum compassionate allowance sanctioned under Rule 41 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, holding the respondents' decision lawful and non-arbitrary.
Sandeep Kansal & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from matrimonial disputes upon the parties' amicable settlement, emphasizing the court's power to end criminal proceedings in such cases.
Baby Kaur & Ors. v. Mohd Umar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the employees’ compensation claim for fresh consideration, emphasizing liberal construction of the EC Act and granting liberty to file a fresh claim.
Mihir Kumar Jena & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition by casual workers seeking pay parity, directing them to submit a representation which the Respondents must consider and decide upon, leaving substantive legal issues open.
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. G L Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that continuation of suspension beyond 90 days without review under CCS Rules is invalid and directed payment of full salary with interest to the suspended employee.
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Ram Kumar Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the insurance company's appeal by modifying liability to 50:50 and enhanced compensation for a fatal motor accident, applying correct legal principles on notional income, multiplier, and permissible heads of damages.
Jagdeep Singh v. Office of the Commissioner of Customs (Delhi Airport) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that two authorities cannot impose penalties twice for the same offences under the Customs Act, setting aside the order passed without jurisdiction and remanding the matter for fresh adjudication limited to the currency seizure.
PREPLADDER PRIVATE LIMITED v. DR GOBIND RAI GARG
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a License Agreement between Prepladder Private Limited and Dr. Gobind Rai Garg.
Sunder Kukreja v. The State
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges under Sections 354, 354D, and 506 IPC against the petitioner, dismissing his petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the FIR and charge framing orders.
Sunder Kukreja v. The State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR and charge framing under Sections 354, 354D, and 506 IPC, holding that prima facie offences are made out and no exceptional circumstances exist to interfere under Section 482 CrPC.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. MUNNA KUMAR & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer who fails to prove timely communication of policy cancellation to the RTO remains liable to pay compensation to the claimant and may recover it from the vehicle owner and driver.