Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Union of India v. Dulari & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Railway Claims Tribunal's award of death compensation to a deceased train passenger under the no-fault liability principle, rejecting the plea of self-inflicted injury and confirming the passenger's status despite initial absence of the journey ticket.
Guriya Kumari v. DG CISF and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation on pay fixation and related benefits within a specified time with a reasoned order, without adjudicating the substantive claims.
COTY GERMANY GMBH v. XERYUS RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
The Delhi High Court granted ex-parte permanent injunction and costs in favor of Coty Germany GmbH against defendants for trademark infringement and passing off involving Calvin Klein marks.
Dr. Amit Kumar v. Bharati College
Suspension without Vice-Chancellor's approval is invalid; salary paid prior to valid suspension cannot be recovered, and subsistence allowance is payable only from suspension approval date.
Union of India v. Harpreet & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's ruling that recovery of excess payments made over five years prior is impermissible, while adjourning the issue of pay scale reduction.
Sanjay Singh v. All India Football Federation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging interim recognition of a football association's committee as infructuous after fresh elections were held and a duly constituted executive committee assumed office.
Rajinder Singh Bhatia v. Manju Bhatia
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application for summary judgment under Order XII Rule 6 CPC due to lack of clear and unambiguous admissions by the defendant, emphasizing the discretionary nature of such relief and the necessity of a fair trial.
NDMC v. M/S SHREE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for filing objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act begins from the date of receipt of the signed arbitral award, excluding that date, and allowed the appeal setting aside the dismissal on limitation grounds.
Delhi Development Authority & Anr v. Jagminder Pal Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the DDA's appeal against an interim order directing desealing of a property pending writ petition challenging eviction, relying on the DDA's own restoration policy and deposits made by respondents.
ITC Limited v. Mahavir Singla
The Delhi High Court held that a suit based on multiple invoices and ledger accounts is not maintainable as a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC and granted the defendant unconditional leave to defend due to substantial triable issues raised.
Narender Kumar Wadhwa v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that eligibility for allotment under the Rohini Scheme is determined at application stage, not provisional allotment, and set aside DDA's cancellation of allotment based on a purportedly false affidavit affirmed before sale of alternate property.
K. P. Rao v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Sports Code's age and tenure restrictions apply to AKFI and all its State and District constituents, quashing unconstitutional amendments and directing fresh elections in compliance with the Code.
K. P. Rao v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that age and tenure restrictions under the National Sports Development Code apply to AKFI and all its State and District constituents, quashing unconstitutional amendments and directing fresh elections in compliance with the Code.
K. P. Rao v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Sports Code's age and tenure restrictions apply to AKFI and all its State and District constituents, quashing unconstitutional amendments and directing fresh elections in compliance with the Code.
Ashish Parasar & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce decree, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Yad Ram v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing reconsideration of the petitioner’s claim for alternative plot allotment after complete acquisition of his land, emphasizing procedural compliance and substantive entitlement.
Intercontinental Great Brands v. Parle Product Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the defendant's "FAB!O" mark and packaging are phonetically and visually similar to the plaintiff's "OREO" brand, granting interim injunction against the defendant for trademark infringement and passing off.
Shiv Kumar Saxena & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR registered on a Magistrate's direction, holding that premature quashing is impermissible when investigation is ongoing and allegations may be civil in nature.
Manjitpal Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking refund of security deposit paid during NEET SS counselling, holding MCC not liable for college fee disclosures and upholding the forfeiture clause for non-joining candidates.
Sachin Thakur & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi & Anr.)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled their differences and obtained a mutual consent divorce.