Delhi High Court
29,724 judgments
Union of India v. Paresh Nath Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal and applications for condonation of delay due to insufficient grounds and held that unexplained delays render appeals not maintainable.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd v. Madhu & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurer's appeal to modify the motor accident compensation award by increasing deduction for personal expenses and deleting loss of consortium awarded to a claimant who died before the award.
Werywin Defence Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court clarified that import of arms requires licences both from DDP under FTDR Act and 'Form X' licence from DGFT under the Arms Act, directing release of imported consignments upon compliance.
Lucky Panchal v. Prem Lata & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order granting maintenance to the minor child born during marriage despite separation, rejecting the husband's challenge to paternity and maintenance liability.
Bernd Alexander Bruno Wehnelt v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the extradition inquiry report and dismissed the petition challenging the extradition of a German national to Germany for child sexual offenses, affirming the validity of document authentication and dual criminality under the Extradition Act and treaty.
Deccan Management Consultants Finishing Schools Skill Foundation v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that while the NEEM scheme can be discontinued, students enrolled before closure must be allowed to complete their training and receive certification.
Aman Nimi-Kadki v. Haryana Raj Audyogik Siksha Sangam
The court upheld dismissal of the appellant's application for resumption of industrial dispute proceedings due to non-compliance with settlement terms and ordered recovery of dues.
Aman Nimi-Kadki v. Haryana Raj Audyogik Siksha Sangam
The High Court upheld the lawful cancellation of an industrial allotment by HSIDC due to the appellant's failure to comply with stipulated conditions and rejected the appellant's plea for resumption and relief.
Piyush Sharma v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking appointment after finding the petitioner was not in the merit list and the appointment letter was issued inadvertently.
Aditya Bagree & Ors. v. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission & Anr.
Delhi High Court directs the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to expeditiously dispose of a pending consumer complaint delayed due to frivolous applications by the respondent.
Zeeshan Qamar v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 43D(2)(b) UAPA, extension of detention beyond 90 days requires court satisfaction with the Public Prosecutor’s report but the report need not be supplied to the accused, and extensions can be granted in truncated periods with due judicial scrutiny.
Kuber Planters Limited v. National Faceless Assessment Centre & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the revenue to furnish the approval order under Section 151 before proceeding with reassessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Mizha Siddeeque & Anr. v. National Investigation Agency
The document is a brief order entry referencing another case for detailed orders and does not contain substantive judgment content.
Rakesh Kumar Sharma v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending promotion representations in accordance with a prior court order within a stipulated time, allowing further challenge if aggrieved.
Brilliant Etoile Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed MCD to revalidate a sanctioned building plan, holding that consolidation proceedings had attained finality and administrative delay was unjustified.
Col. Ajeet Pal Singh v. A.K. Vashistha
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to take the respondent's written statement on record under Section 151 CPC, directing the trial court to proceed in accordance with law, relying on Supreme Court precedents permitting such acceptance subject to conditions.
Zamin Adil Bhat v. National Investigation Agency
The document is an order sheet entry referencing another case for orders, without substantive judgment content.
Arvin Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a new policy increasing hard-area posting tenure cannot be applied retrospectively to personnel posted under an earlier policy and directed the administration to consider their transfer representations accordingly.
Devender Mann v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for murder under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness, medical, and forensic evidence despite minor discrepancies and inconclusive DNA results.
Dr. B. Sukumar v. Indira Gandhi National Open University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking retrospective promotion due to inordinate delay and laches, emphasizing that settled seniority and vested rights cannot be disturbed after a long lapse of time.