Delhi High Court
61,796 judgments
Ram Prakash v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioner's pro rata pension claim under the latest policy and pass a reasoned order, disposing of the petition with liberty to approach appropriate forums if aggrieved.
M/S Well Protect Manpower Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a three-year debarment order against a security services contractor for failure to provide PSARA training certificates due to violation of natural justice, allowing fresh proceedings with proper notice.
V.P.S. Tomar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutionality and validity of the modified merit-based Flexible Complementing Scheme for promotion of scientific officers, dismissing the petitioner's challenge of arbitrariness and discrimination.
Shailesh & Ors. v. The State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from a property dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties under its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
HMT L Thamotharan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to provide compliance details and allowed the petitioner to represent grievances on pay discrepancies following a military rank reduction order, emphasizing procedural fairness without deciding on the merits.
Rohan Desai & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition declaring Mr. Dipesh Desai as the adoptive father of Mr. Rohan Desai based on biological father's consent and the child's best interests despite formal adoption procedures not being completed before majority.
Vikash Shukla v. Ministry of Science and Technology
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner was entitled to the third installment of the INSPIRE Scholarship as he met the aggregate CGPA requirement, directing its release with interest and awarding costs for wrongful withholding.
Ravinder Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed official demarcation of the petitioner's land using the Total Station Method with costs borne by the petitioner, allowing the writ petition challenging refusal to demarcate.
Commissioner Transport Department v. Gaurav Enterprises
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting 12% per annum interest as compensatory, dismissing the government department's challenge that the rate was penal and excessive.
Chandra Prakash Khandelwal v. Directorate of Enforcement
Delhi High Court granted bail to petitioner accused under PMLA after applying the principle of broad probabilities, noting his limited role, cooperation, and absence of tampering or influencing witnesses.
Bharti Model School v. Director Education GNCTD and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate of Education to hear the petitioner and pass a formal order on validation of off-line admissions within two weeks, emphasizing compliance with court directions and natural justice.
Jainsons Lights Private Limited v. The Registrar of Trade Marks
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal to register the mark "Jainsons Lights" due to its similarity with an earlier mark "Jainsons Lites" and the likelihood of public confusion under Section 11(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Dr. Sapna Nangia v. The Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
Delhi High Court set aside a perfunctory patent rejection order for lack of adequate reasoning and remanded the matter for detailed reconsideration with a speaking order.
T D Makhija v. Union Bank of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a bank officer for fraud, ruling that the departmental enquiry was fair, evidence supported the findings, and the punishment was proportionate.
Rao Mohd. Nadeem v. WAPCOS Ltd.
The Delhi High Court quashed an indefinite blacklisting order against a temporary consultant for failure to comply with principles of natural justice and procedural fairness.
Pelican Grand Motels Private Limited v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court held that a corporate debtor must be given a fair opportunity to place its reply on record and be heard before the NCLT admits a Section 7 petition under the IBC, setting aside the NCLT order that closed the right to file a reply.
Ishwar Singh v. Ramesh Prakash
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal by recording a settlement where the appellant deposited a higher amount as full and final settlement, directing release of the amount with interest to the respondent and refund of court fees to the appellant.
Mohinder Wadhwa v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that it cannot direct a private bank to accept a loan restructuring proposal under RBI guidelines and dismissed the writ petition seeking such relief.
Ankur Saluja v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Section 420 IPC based on a lawful settlement between parties in a private dispute, directing the trial court to recall the proclamation order accordingly.
Alok Gupta v. Anjani Gupta & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of petitioners' application for impleadment in a partition suit, holding they are neither necessary nor proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.