Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Jobida Bano & Ors. v. Royal Sundram General Insurance Co Ltd & Anr
Delhi High Court held that territorial jurisdiction under Section 21(1)(b) of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 includes the residence of the employee or dependant, setting aside the dismissal of claim for lack of jurisdiction and remanding for fresh adjudication.
M/S IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA RAILWAY COACH FACTORY
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitral tribunal cannot unilaterally fix arbitrators’ fees contrary to contractual terms and Railway Board rates, and directed the tribunal to publish the Award under Section 39(2) of the Arbitration Act.
Shobha Dikshit v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking rehabilitation of residents of demolished jhuggis on DDA land, holding that only notified clusters existing before 2006 are entitled to rehabilitation under the DUSIB Policy, and illegal encroachers have no such right.
Mushab Anwar v. National Investigation Agency
The document is an order sheet entry referencing another case for orders and does not contain substantive judgment details.
Bolt Technology OU v. Ujoy Technology Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favor of Bolt Technology OU, recognizing its trans-border reputation and goodwill in the "BOLT" mark and restraining the defendant from using the mark in EV charging services in India for passing off.
Manish Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a rape and criminal intimidation case due to unexplained delay in FIR registration and lack of evidence of tampering or threat, imposing conditions to safeguard the investigation.
Rahee Infratech Limited v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld DMRC's rejection of the petitioner's tender bid for a fastening system due to non-compliance with the proven track record requirement, emphasizing that tender conditions cannot be challenged post-participation absent arbitrariness.
Ashish Khanna & Anr. v. M/S Roshni Hotels Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that judgment under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC cannot be passed where disputed facts and a cross suit exist, and directed the defendant to pay adjusted licence fees pendente lite while dismissing the plaintiffs' possession application.
Sanjay Bhatia v. Rajive Bhatia & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the partition decree granting 50% share to Rajive Bhatia based on a valid relinquishment deed, rejecting claims of joint family property and invalidity of the deed.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR v. SHRI PAL
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation of Rs. 23.47 lakh awarded for medical negligence causing 85% disability to a vegetable vendor, affirming the multiplier method over Workmen Compensation Act calculations.
M/S Kuldeep Kumar Contractor v. Hindustan Prefab Limited
The Delhi High Court held that issuance of a No-Claim Certificate does not preclude arbitration and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes, emphasizing the independence of arbitration clauses and limited judicial interference.
R.K. Aggarwal v. Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Ors.
The Delhi High Court remanded for fresh consideration the question of disqualification of a cooperative society member owning residential properties, emphasizing prospective application of rules and procedural fairness.
Talkaji Bhaguji Prajapati v. Rashik Soap Factory
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal challenging an ex parte interim injunction, directing expeditious hearing of the appellant's application to vacate the injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC.
EX-CT/GD Basavaraj Kotrappanavar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful dismissal of a BSF constable for wilful overstay of leave without sufficient cause, affirming the authority of the Commandant to dismiss under Section 11(2) of the BSF Act following due procedure.
Tejpal Singh v. Surinder Kumar Dewan
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking appointment of an arbitrator for fresh disputes arising from a terminated collaboration agreement, holding the claims barred by limitation and res judicata and constituting abuse of process.
LT OVERSEAS NORTH AMERICA INC & ANR. v. KRBL LIMITED
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief restraining the defendant from using packaging with prominent 'ROYAL' mark infringing the plaintiffs' trademark, allowing use of revised packaging with reduced prominence to avoid confusion.
Union of India and Ors. v. BWO Bijan Kumar Ghosh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection absent contrary proof and limiting writ review to jurisdictional errors.
Hardik Kapoor v. Bar Council of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Bar Council of India exclusively prescribes advocates' dress code and directed a uniform dress code for law interns across Delhi, setting aside a local Bar Association's conflicting circular.
Rohit Kumar & Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed junior Kabaddi players to participate in the World Championship, holding that minor injuries and vague medical advice do not justify last-minute exclusion from representing India.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. OM Nanotech Pvt Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the definition of “services” under the SEZ Act applies to Section 10AA deductions, allowing trading units importing for re-export to claim tax benefits.