Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 24th February, 2023
RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Pulak Gupta and Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocates.
Through: Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla CGSC along with Mr. Sarvan Kumar GP and
Sh. Paramveer Singh AC (Law), BSF.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
JUDGMENT
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
2. The application is disposed of CM APPL.9079/2023 (Seeking Exemption)
3. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
4. The application is disposed of.
5. A petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: “ a.) To issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other writ/order/direction directing the Respondents to comply with the order dated 24.07.2012 passed by this Hon’ble Court in Writ Petition(C) 2121/1998 (ANNEXURE P[1]) in true and fair manner and conduct proper DPC for the Petitioner as per the rules for promotion from Dy. Commandant to the rank of Second-in-command in terms of order dated | 24.07.2012 and accordingly grant him all the consequential benefits as has been done in case of similarly situated person namely Sh. Madhu Sudan Sharma and Sh. Indra Kumar Mehta vide order and judgment dated 28.07.2011 passed by this Hon’ble Court in W.P.(C) 8709/2010 and 7241/2001 titled as 'Indra Kumar Mehta V Union of India & Ors." and “Sh. Madhu Sudan Sharma vs Union of Induia and Ors.” respectively. (ANNEXURE P12); b.) Award Rs. 20 Lacs as cost of litigation in Hon’ble High Court and Hon’ble Supreme Court since 1998 i.e. filing of W.P.C) No. 2121/1998 till disposal of this Writ Petition; c.) To issue any other relief and further relief to the Petitioner in the interest of justice which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the light of the above facts and circumstances.”
6. For the aforesaid reliefs, the petitioner has filed representation dated 20.12.2019 and thereafter on 06.04.2022. However, the said representations are still pending for decision.
7. We hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioner in terms of the Order dated 24.07.2012 passed by this Court in W.P (C) 2121/1998 with reasoned order within four weeks and communicate the decision to the petitioner within one week thereafter.
8. Needless to say that if the petitioner is still aggrieved with the decision of the respondents, he may challenge the same before the appropriate Forum.
9. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA)
JUDGE FEBRUARY 24, 2023