Delhi High Court

61,796 judgments

Year:

Kuber Planters Limited v. National Faceless Assessment Centre & Ors.

24 Feb 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Vikas Mahajan · 2023:DHC:1702-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the revenue to furnish the approval order under Section 151 before proceeding with reassessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

tax petition_allowed reassessment proceedings Section 148 Income Tax Act Section 151 approval specified authority

Mizha Siddeeque & Anr. v. National Investigation Agency

24 Feb 2023 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal · 2023:DHC:1365-DB

The document is a brief order entry referencing another case for detailed orders and does not contain substantive judgment content.

other

Rakesh Kumar Sharma v. Union of India & Anr.

24 Feb 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:1482-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending promotion representations in accordance with a prior court order within a stipulated time, allowing further challenge if aggrieved.

administrative other writ petition promotion Deputy Commandant Second-in-Command

Brilliant Etoile Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

24 Feb 2023 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · W.P.(C) 14040/2022

The Delhi High Court directed MCD to revalidate a sanctioned building plan, holding that consolidation proceedings had attained finality and administrative delay was unjustified.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Sanctioned Building Plan Revalidation Unified Building Bye-Laws Delhi 2016 Section 30 East Punjab Holdings Act

Col. Ajeet Pal Singh v. A.K. Vashistha

24 Feb 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:1531

The Delhi High Court allowed the application to take the respondent's written statement on record under Section 151 CPC, directing the trial court to proceed in accordance with law, relying on Supreme Court precedents permitting such acceptance subject to conditions.

civil petition_allowed Significant written statement Section 151 CPC Order VIII Rule 1 CPC compensatory costs

Zamin Adil Bhat v. National Investigation Agency

24 Feb 2023 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal · 2023:DHC:1369-DB

The document is an order sheet entry referencing another case for orders, without substantive judgment content.

other

Arvin Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

24 Feb 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:1393-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a new policy increasing hard-area posting tenure cannot be applied retrospectively to personnel posted under an earlier policy and directed the administration to consider their transfer representations accordingly.

administrative other Significant transfer policy hard-area posting soft-area posting policy supersession

Devender Mann v. State

24 Feb 2023 · Mukta Gupta; Poonam A. Bamba · 2023:DHC:1411-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for murder under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness, medical, and forensic evidence despite minor discrepancies and inconclusive DNA results.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness identification premeditation

Dr. B. Sukumar v. Indira Gandhi National Open University & Ors.

24 Feb 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:1730
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking retrospective promotion due to inordinate delay and laches, emphasizing that settled seniority and vested rights cannot be disturbed after a long lapse of time.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant delay and laches retrospective promotion seniority service matter

Pharmacy Council of India v. Shri Girraj Maharaj College of Pharmacy

24 Feb 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2023:DHC:1480-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of PCI's non-speaking rejection orders and directed fresh consideration after communicating deficiencies and allowing rectification, reinforcing principles of natural justice in administrative approvals.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Pharmacy Council of India moratorium inspection report natural justice

Jobida Bano & Ors. v. Royal Sundram General Insurance Co Ltd & Anr

24 Feb 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:1532

Delhi High Court held that territorial jurisdiction under Section 21(1)(b) of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 includes the residence of the employee or dependant, setting aside the dismissal of claim for lack of jurisdiction and remanding for fresh adjudication.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Section 21 territorial jurisdiction beneficial legislation

M/S IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA RAILWAY COACH FACTORY

24 Feb 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:1373
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an arbitral tribunal cannot unilaterally fix arbitrators’ fees contrary to contractual terms and Railway Board rates, and directed the tribunal to publish the Award under Section 39(2) of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitral Tribunal fees Section 39 Arbitration Act Party autonomy Lien on Award

Shobha Dikshit v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board & Ors.

24 Feb 2023 · Gaurang Kanth · 2023:DHC:1403

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking rehabilitation of residents of demolished jhuggis on DDA land, holding that only notified clusters existing before 2006 are entitled to rehabilitation under the DUSIB Policy, and illegal encroachers have no such right.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant rehabilitation relocation jhuggi clusters DUSIB Policy 2015

Mushab Anwar v. National Investigation Agency

24 Feb 2023 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal

The document is an order sheet entry referencing another case for orders and does not contain substantive judgment details.

other

Bolt Technology OU v. Ujoy Technology Private Limited & Anr.

24 Feb 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · CS(COMM) 582/2022

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favor of Bolt Technology OU, recognizing its trans-border reputation and goodwill in the "BOLT" mark and restraining the defendant from using the mark in EV charging services in India for passing off.

civil appeal_allowed Significant passing off trans-border reputation unregistered trademark goodwill

Manish Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

24 Feb 2023 · Amit Sharma · 2023:DHC:1315

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a rape and criminal intimidation case due to unexplained delay in FIR registration and lack of evidence of tampering or threat, imposing conditions to safeguard the investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 CrPC Section 376 IPC Section 506 IPC

Rahee Infratech Limited v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited & Ors.

24 Feb 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2023:DHC:1381-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld DMRC's rejection of the petitioner's tender bid for a fastening system due to non-compliance with the proven track record requirement, emphasizing that tender conditions cannot be challenged post-participation absent arbitrariness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender conditions technical bid rejection proven track record re-engineered fastening system

Ashish Khanna & Anr. v. M/S Roshni Hotels Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

24 Feb 2023 · Mini Pushkarna

The Delhi High Court held that judgment under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC cannot be passed where disputed facts and a cross suit exist, and directed the defendant to pay adjusted licence fees pendente lite while dismissing the plaintiffs' possession application.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VIII Rule 10 CPC Order 39 Rule 10 CPC licence deed possession

Sanjay Bhatia v. Rajive Bhatia & Ors.

24 Feb 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:1319-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the partition decree granting 50% share to Rajive Bhatia based on a valid relinquishment deed, rejecting claims of joint family property and invalidity of the deed.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition relinquishment deed self-acquired property Hindu Succession Act, 1956

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR v. SHRI PAL

24 Feb 2023 · SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA; SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD · 2023:DHC:1379-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld compensation of Rs. 23.47 lakh awarded for medical negligence causing 85% disability to a vegetable vendor, affirming the multiplier method over Workmen Compensation Act calculations.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant medical negligence compensation disability assessment multiplier method