Delhi High Court
29,724 judgments
Sanjay Kumar Sajan v. Meenakshi Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that once an arbitral award challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is dismissed, the same grounds cannot be re-agitated as objections in execution proceedings under the Code of Civil Procedure.
Prahlad Kapoor v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of possessing counterfeit currency and materials for counterfeiting, holding that at the bail stage only prima facie case is to be considered and possession of half-printed notes attracts Section 489A IPC.
Hotel Hans Private Limited & Ors. v. M/S Mirage Hospitality & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiffs' suit for arrears of rent and mesne profits after the defendants breached a settlement agreement, granting judgment based on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.
Maytas Subhash v. IRCON International Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the lead partner of a joint venture retains authority to enforce an arbitral award despite the JV's cessation, and that execution proceedings under Section 47 CPC can address jurisdictional nullity pleas without re-examining the award's merits.
Nawal Sood v. Amar Sood
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking stay of execution of possession decree, holding that pendency of a suit for specific performance and unregistered bayana agreement do not justify staying execution under Order XXI Rule 29 CPC.
Dr S Umesh Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition in a service matter on maintainability grounds, holding that the Central Administrative Tribunal is the proper forum for adjudication.
ADO India Pvt. Ltd. v. ATS Housing Private Limited
Delhi High Court allowed the petition to appoint a sole arbitrator, holding that invocation of arbitration was valid despite prior MSME proceedings, and referred the parties to arbitration for dispute resolution.
Himanshu Bhatt v. India Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to HRA and SPA only on 50% back wages as per the Division Bench’s order and directed the employer to regulate salary for the period of unauthorized absence by a speaking order.
Through: Mr. Baldeo Sharan, Advocate v. STATE(NCT OF DELHI)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging conviction under section 304-A IPC for rash and negligent driving causing death, affirming the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction and the credibility of eyewitness evidence.
Kent RO Systems Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Pushpendra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to Kent RO Systems against Defendant 1 for infringing its registered water purifier design, affirming the validity and subsistence of the design registration and rejecting challenges based on prior publication and expiry.
Nitesh Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the review petition directing a fresh medical examination by a Medical Board for a candidate declared medically unfit, holding the Board's report final and binding and permitting further selection if found fit.
Surendra Lal Mahendra v. Late Sh. B. Lal Mahendra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff to amend the plaint to challenge a Conveyance Deed and granted interim injunction restraining defendants from alienating the disputed industrial property pending suit resolution.
Bhushan Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. Rajinder Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court passed a preliminary decree of partition on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, rejecting the defendant's plea of oral partition during the deceased owner's lifetime as legally unsustainable.
Rahul Yadav & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discretionary grant of pardon to an accused turning approver under Sections 306 and 307 CrPC, emphasizing that prosecution approval is not mandatory and reasons for pardon can be satisfied by recorded statements and reasoned orders.
Subhash Chand v. Balkishan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging closure of the defendant’s right to file written statement and lead evidence, holding that unchallenged closure orders bind the parties and procedural errors do not confer substantive rights.
Dayalbagh Educational Institute Deemed University v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed students admitted under interim permission to complete their B.H.M.S. course despite denial of formal recognition, affirming deemed permission under the Homeopathic Central Council Act, 1973.
Abdul Rauf Javed v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of a shop license post eviction upheld by the Supreme Court, holding the claim barred by final adjudication and constituting abuse of process.
Vijender Gupta v. Legislative Assembly of the National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside a one-year suspension of an MLA for violating the graded suspension limits under Assembly Rules, reaffirming the constitutional right to representation and adherence to procedural fairness.
M/S. AUTOMOBILES ASSOCIATION OF UPPER INDIA v. BANSRAJ SHUKLA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held that applications under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act are independent and must be decided expeditiously, affirming the employer's liability to pay wages during the pendency of litigation even if the reinstatement award is stayed.
Naveen Bathla v. M/S Youth Destination & Anr.
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator despite an arbitration clause providing for two arbitrators, affirming that an even number of arbitrators does not invalidate the arbitration agreement.