Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
ISCHEMIX LLC v. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS
The Delhi High Court allowed the patent applicant's appeal, quashing the rejection order for failure to cite prior art in the hearing notice and remanding the application for fresh consideration with an opportunity to rebut.
M/S HERO FINCORP LTD v. M/S SHAHDARA X-RAY AND PATHOLOGY CENTRE & ORS
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from loan agreements despite allegations of forgery and fraud by the respondents.
Manoj Kumar and Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent school to fill three PGT English posts by promotion through a DPC, limiting relief to procedural compliance and leaving seniority disputes to separate proceedings.
Arshiya Zia and Anr. v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners temporary stay in the staff quarter for two months pending compassionate appointment application but directed vacation thereafter as per University rules.
Yash Anand v. Air India Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition against Air India Limited on maintainability grounds post-privatization, holding that writ jurisdiction does not extend to privatized entities no longer controlled by the government.
Rashtriya Transport Corporation v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court held that the presumption of ownership under Section 3(9) of the DVAT Act is rebuttable by producing documents within a reasonable time after inspection, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Vinita Tyagi v. Bala Pritam Guru Harikrishan Int. Public School
Termination of a recognized private school employee without prior approval of the Director of Education under Section 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 is illegal and the employee must be reinstated.
Anu Banka & Anr. v. Suman Lata Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that eviction proceedings under the Senior Citizens Act are summary and do not decide title disputes, which must be resolved by civil courts, and upheld eviction for the welfare of the senior citizen without adjudicating title.
NTPC Ltd v. Larsen and Toubro Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an application to update counter-claims in arbitration is an amendment subject to Tribunal's discretion under Section 23(3), and refusal on delay grounds is not an interim award challengeable under Section 34.
Suman Sapra v. Rosy Dabas
The Delhi High Court held that a decree is executable from the date it is passed regardless of stamp paper engrossment delay, allowing auction of the suit property subject to payment of stamp duty from sale proceeds.
Medical Pollution Control Committee v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the DPCC to decide on the petitioner’s tender bid within two months and either issue the LOA or refund the deposited amounts with interest, ensuring timely administrative action.
Sanjay Kumar Sajan v. Meenakshi Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that once an arbitral award challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is dismissed, the same grounds cannot be re-agitated as objections in execution proceedings under the Code of Civil Procedure.
Prahlad Kapoor v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of possessing counterfeit currency and materials for counterfeiting, holding that at the bail stage only prima facie case is to be considered and possession of half-printed notes attracts Section 489A IPC.
Hotel Hans Private Limited & Ors. v. M/S Mirage Hospitality & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiffs' suit for arrears of rent and mesne profits after the defendants breached a settlement agreement, granting judgment based on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.
Maytas Subhash v. IRCON International Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the lead partner of a joint venture retains authority to enforce an arbitral award despite the JV's cessation, and that execution proceedings under Section 47 CPC can address jurisdictional nullity pleas without re-examining the award's merits.
Nawal Sood v. Amar Sood
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking stay of execution of possession decree, holding that pendency of a suit for specific performance and unregistered bayana agreement do not justify staying execution under Order XXI Rule 29 CPC.
Dr S Umesh Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition in a service matter on maintainability grounds, holding that the Central Administrative Tribunal is the proper forum for adjudication.
ADO India Pvt. Ltd. v. ATS Housing Private Limited
Delhi High Court allowed the petition to appoint a sole arbitrator, holding that invocation of arbitration was valid despite prior MSME proceedings, and referred the parties to arbitration for dispute resolution.
Himanshu Bhatt v. India Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to HRA and SPA only on 50% back wages as per the Division Bench’s order and directed the employer to regulate salary for the period of unauthorized absence by a speaking order.
Through: Mr. Baldeo Sharan, Advocate v. STATE(NCT OF DELHI)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging conviction under section 304-A IPC for rash and negligent driving causing death, affirming the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction and the credibility of eyewitness evidence.