Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Ornate Agencies Private Limited v. ACIT Circle 19(1) New Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment proceedings for AY 2017-18 due to lack of quantification of escaped income and absence of required approval, emphasizing that reopening cannot be based on mere change of opinion.
DBS Bank India Limited v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that criminal proceedings pending against a bank prior to its non-voluntary amalgamation may continue against the transferee bank unless expressly abated, and stayed the summoning order against DBS Bank pending RBI's clarification on the scheme's interpretation.
Gayatri Balu v. Jawaharlal Nehru University
The Delhi High Court set aside a disciplinary order against a JNU student for violation of natural justice, emphasizing the necessity of a fair hearing before adverse administrative action.
Sandeep Kumar v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court clarified that compulsory retirement with pensionary benefits does not amount to a stigma but refused to reinstate the petitioner or grant further benefits.
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Veena Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal under Section 30 of the Employees’ Compensation Act, holding that the employer-employee relationship was admitted and the scope of appeal is limited to substantial questions of law, thereby upholding the compensation awarded to the claimants.
Experion Developers Pvt Ltd v. Dy Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that External Development Charges paid to Haryana Urban Development Authority are statutory fees not liable for TDS deduction under Section 194-I of the Income Tax Act, setting aside the AO's demand orders.
Ahlcon Public School v. Directorate of Education
The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate of Education to decide a school’s fee increase application within four weeks, failing which the school is entitled to a 15% automatic fee hike.
Bhagat Singh v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the Land & Building Department to reconsider the petitioner's application for allotment of an alternative plot after submission of requisite documents and grant an opportunity of hearing.
Smt. Gindori v. Consolidation Officer
The Delhi High Court directed the Consolidation Officer to dispose of the petitioner's representation regarding land dispute expeditiously following a prior remand order.
Savita Sardana v. Satish Paul & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed objections claiming ownership by adverse possession in execution proceedings, holding that mere permissive possession without hostile assertion is insufficient to establish title against a registered owner.
Loreal India Pvt. Ltd. v. Rajesh Kumar Taneja Trading as Innovative Derma Care and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to cancel the trademark "CLARIWASH", holding that registry errors do not invalidate registrations and that the marks in dispute are not deceptively similar.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. B N Magon
The Delhi High Court held that professional services by advocates from residential premises do not constitute taxable business activity under the DMC Act, dismissing the MCD's appeal against quashing of property tax demand.
Master Prakalp Sharma v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a single parent to apply for a US passport for her minor child subject to the father's consent and conditions safeguarding parental rights and child welfare amid ongoing custody disputes.
Sandeep Aggarwal v. Union of India
Delhi High Court set aside the maximum compounding fee imposed under the Customs Act for a first-time offender and remanded the matter for reconsideration after partial payment.
M/S ERNST AND YOUNG LIMITED v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, CGST APPEALS -II, DELHI AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that professional services rendered by Ernst & Young's Indian branch to overseas entities are not intermediary services and qualify as export of services, entitling the petitioner to input tax credit refund.
Intech Brinechem Limited v. DE Dietrich Process Systems India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, holding that adherence to ICA Rules is not mandatory absent mutual consent, thereby facilitating arbitration despite procedural objections.
Anil Kumar Goel v. Rekha Goel
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is a proper party to the rent recovery suit and allowed his impleadment by setting aside the trial court's dismissal of the application under Order I Rule 10 CPC.
Bhavya Cerations v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions challenging show cause notices under Section 4 of the Public Premises Act are not maintainable and directed petitioners to file replies and exhaust statutory remedies before the Estate Officer.
OYO HOTELS AND HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that withholding of tax refund under Section 241A requires detailed, written reasons and prior approval, and mere issuance of scrutiny notice does not justify withholding refund.
Lokesh Kumar Arya v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and extend old pension scheme benefits to the petitioner if eligible, following binding precedents and applicable pension rules.