Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Sanjeev Tiwari v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking permission to participate in LDCE 2021, holding that a final departmental punishment disqualifies a candidate from eligibility due to lack of a clean service record.
Sunday Chinaka Uchem v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of four Nigerian nationals for murder and robbery based on reliable circumstantial evidence including authenticated CCTV footage and call records, dismissing challenges to evidence admissibility and procedural lapses.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND ANOTHER .....
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration without prior notice is invalid and directed cancellation to take effect from the date of the show cause notice.
Sulochna Gupta v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief restraining possession under the SARFAESI Act pending disposal of a recall application before the Debt Recovery Tribunal to prevent extreme hardship.
SHRI RAVI KANT v. SHRI RAMA KANT & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner, an armed forces officer, to file a written statement beyond the premature closure by the trial court, relying on COVID-19 limitation extensions and settled law on pleadings.
Indupal Kaur Sehgal v. Dr. Davinder Pal Singh Rekhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application to amend pleadings challenging a prior partition decree, holding that the amendment would change the nature of the suit and constitute misuse of the legal process.
Praveen Gusain v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to co-accused in a murder case after prolonged custody, emphasizing that bail is the rule and jail the exception, with guilt to be determined at trial.
AIIMS v. MS S S Total Construction India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, holding that limited grounds for interference were not met and the award was not patently illegal or against public policy.
B.R.T.T. College v. National Council for Teacher Education
The Delhi High Court held that issuance of Show Cause Notices under Section 17 of the NCTE Act requires recorded satisfaction based on material and directed that blanket notices be treated as calls for response, while upholding individual SCNs detailing specific deficiencies.
Sh Shakir & Anr. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute due to an amicable settlement and the complainant's unwillingness to proceed.
Mr. Rajat Sharma, Advocate. v. JITENDER KUMAR .....
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash proceedings under Section 138 N.I. Act, holding that the High Court cannot pre-try the case and the accused must raise defence before the trial court.
Anand Kumar Jain v. Kritender Sharma
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to place certified copies of civil suit documents on record in a criminal trial for the trial court's consideration.
Manish Prasad v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that filing a chargesheet within the statutory period precludes default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. despite supplementary chargesheets, but granted bail under Section 35 of the POCSO Act due to trial delay beyond one year.
UP State Road Transport Corporation v. Chhoti Devi @ Poonam Devi
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the motor accident claim appeal, modifying compensation awards and clarifying that smell of alcohol alone does not prove intoxication or contributory negligence.
Gaurav Bhutani v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties reached an amicable settlement and obtained a mutual consent divorce.
Mandev Tubes Private Limited v. Goel Sales Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Trial Court's order releasing seized goods, holding that the respondent had prima facie lawfully obtained the products and the release order required no interference.
Mohit Kumar Gaur & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
P AND T GROUP A ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition on maintainability grounds, holding that service disputes against the Union of India fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.