Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Majestic Handicraft Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices and order under the Income Tax Act for lack of due diligence by the Assessing Officer and directed a fresh examination with opportunity to the petitioner.
MODI INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.
The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2014-15 due to non-consideration of objections and absence of non-disclosure of material facts, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider within four weeks.
MODI INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment proceedings initiated on the basis of a change of opinion, holding that such reassessment under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act is impermissible without tangible material, while allowing the AO liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
Santosh Kumar Sahu & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that employees of AIESL have no vested right to retain government accommodation post-Air India privatization and penal rent deductions require due process under the Public Premises Act.
Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.
Delhi High Court directs coordinated enforcement against non-compliant domain name registrars infringing trademarks, endorsing blocking under IT Act and emphasizing compliance with intermediary guidelines.
Sachin Chadha v. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd to grant electricity connection to the petitioner without requiring NOC from co-owners, subject to commercial formalities, without recognizing ownership rights.
Shiv Mangal Singh v. Panna Lal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that interlocutory observations on possession in a contempt application are prima facie and do not prejudice trial rights, refusing to interfere with the Trial Court's dismissal of the contempt application.
Yashwant Sahu & Anr. v. Ashok Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the closure of an appeal for violation of Section 35B CPC due to delay, laches, and non-payment of costs, upholding the procedural bar against leading evidence after pleadings.
M/S SUPER ADS v. ALL INDIA RADIO (AKASHVANI) & ORS.
Clause 14 of the Agreement empowering the DG, AIR to decide disputes is not an arbitration agreement, and thus the suit for recovery is maintainable without mandatory reference to arbitration.
Govind Swarup & Anr v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to produce records related to a sealed shop before the appellate tribunal, holding that delay in disposal of the petitioners' application was prejudicial and the application had become infructuous.
Amanpreet Kohli v. Pankaj Dayal
The Delhi High Court held that a loan dispute between real estate merchants supported by mercantile documents qualifies as a commercial dispute and granted conditional summary judgment directing the defendant to deposit the claimed amount as security.
M/S S N MALHOTRA AND SONS v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to release principal payments due on duly approved bills to the petitioner within eight weeks, rejecting the Corporation's policy delaying payments based on fund availability.
IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. PIONEER FABRICATORS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that the exclusive jurisdiction clause in the contract governs the territorial jurisdiction to challenge an arbitral award under the MSMED Act, setting aside the order dismissing the petition for lack of jurisdiction.
Union of India v. Om Prakash
The Delhi High Court held that for ACP/MACP benefits, regular service starts from the date of absorption into a new post, and prior service cannot be counted, setting aside the Tribunal’s order granting second ACP benefits notionally from initial appointment.
Bhisham Sharma alias Sidharth Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's criminal appeal, upholding his conviction after affirming that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the trial court's findings were sound.
M/S AMBIENCE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPERS PVT LTD v. M/S MEDUSA FASHION
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act to adjudicate disputes arising from a valid arbitration clause in a commercial MoU, emphasizing the Act's intent for efficient dispute resolution.
Microsoft Corporation v. The Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of Microsoft's patent application for lack of clear reasoning and remanded it for fresh consideration with proper opportunity to amend claims and in light of settled patentability principles.
Dabur India Limited v. The Advertising Standards Council of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application to file additional documents at a belated stage, holding that the documents were irrelevant and not necessary for adjudication under Order VII Rule 14(3) CPC.