Delhi High Court
62,825 judgments
Pragati College of Pharmacy v. Pharmacy Council of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Pharmacy Council of India to consider the petitioner’s B.Pharm approval application for the 2023-24 session with opportunity to rectify deficiencies, setting aside prior non-reasoned rejections.
Himanshu Srivastava and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the CPSE to consider payment of enhanced gratuity from 01.01.2017 subject to affordability, emphasizing the need for a reasoned decision based on financial capacity.
L.N. Ayurved College & Hospital v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner Ayurved college to admit students for the 2019-20 session and permitted those students to complete their course, emphasizing the need for fresh inspection and adherence to natural justice.
Satpal Singh Kohli & Anr. v. Canara Bank
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a writ petition challenging NPA classification and notices under SARFAESI Act, holding that statutory remedies under Sections 13(3A) and 17 must be exhausted before approaching the court.
Reena Singh v. M S Bhumi Sagar Infrastructure Pvt Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as an abuse of process for challenging a summoning order while a revision petition on the same issue was pending before the Sessions Court.
Brahm Dutt v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that CGHS must reimburse expenses for a medically necessary single use dialyzer prescribed by the attending nephrologist, despite lack of prior approval, as no CGHS rule prohibits such treatment.
Abhishek Kumar v. Union of India through Secretary MHA & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the BSF to provide the petitioner with trial proceedings and decide his suspension application within a stipulated time, ensuring procedural fairness under the BSF Act.
Inder Veer Singh v. Director General CISF
The Delhi High Court stayed the transfer order of a CISF personnel and directed the respondents to decide his pending representation within a stipulated time, disposing of the writ petition as premature.
Sultan Ansari v. DRI
The Delhi High Court granted interim bail on medical and humanitarian grounds to an accused under the NDPS Act despite the statutory bail bar, emphasizing the right to adequate medical treatment during prolonged custody.
Mahesh Gupta v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Interim bail was denied to the accused in a murder case due to strong prima facie evidence and previous dismissal of bail applications despite his plea of financial hardship.
Krishna Kant v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under Section 328 IPC due to lack of medical evidence and reliance solely on uncorroborated oral testimony, emphasizing the necessity of cogent proof in cases of administering stupefying substances.
Rahul Sangwan & Ors. v. NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce under section 482 CrPC.
Jagdish Prasad v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a 74-year-old petitioner in custody for four years, imposing conditions to prevent interference with the trial.
Sh. Pritam v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a Fire Operator appointment on grounds of medical unfitness as determined by competent Medical Boards, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge.
Naresh Agrawal v. Rajesh Narang
The Delhi High Court directed reference of a rent agreement dispute to arbitration under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, due to the existence of a valid arbitration clause and non-response by the respondent.
ATS Township Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1) Delhi & Ors
Delhi High Court held reassessment notices for AY 2014-15 issued beyond six years without proper handover of seized material are barred by limitation and quashed the notices and order.
Shweta Jain v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 3, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices issued beyond the prescribed limitation period computed from the date of satisfaction and handover of seized material by the AO of the searched person are invalid, setting aside a Section 148 notice for AY 2015-16 as barred by limitation.
Mahender Kumar Jain v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 3, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices under Section 148 read with Section 153C issued beyond the prescribed limitation period computed from the date of handover of seized material are invalid, setting aside a notice issued for AY 2015-16 as barred by limitation.
Kamlesh Jain v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 3, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices under Section 148 issued beyond the prescribed limitation period computed from the date of handover of seized material are invalid, setting aside the notice for AY 2015-16 as barred by limitation.
Pankaj Jain v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 3, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices under Section 148 issued beyond the prescribed limitation period computed from the date of satisfaction and handover of seized material under Section 153C are invalid and quashed the notice issued for AY 2015-16.