Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Krishna Kant v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under Section 328 IPC due to lack of medical evidence and reliance solely on uncorroborated oral testimony, emphasizing the necessity of cogent proof in cases of administering stupefying substances.
Rahul Sangwan & Ors. v. NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce under section 482 CrPC.
Jagdish Prasad v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a 74-year-old petitioner in custody for four years, imposing conditions to prevent interference with the trial.
Sh. Pritam v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a Fire Operator appointment on grounds of medical unfitness as determined by competent Medical Boards, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge.
Naresh Agrawal v. Rajesh Narang
The Delhi High Court directed reference of a rent agreement dispute to arbitration under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, due to the existence of a valid arbitration clause and non-response by the respondent.
ATS Township Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1) Delhi & Ors
Delhi High Court held reassessment notices for AY 2014-15 issued beyond six years without proper handover of seized material are barred by limitation and quashed the notices and order.
Shweta Jain v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 3, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices issued beyond the prescribed limitation period computed from the date of satisfaction and handover of seized material by the AO of the searched person are invalid, setting aside a Section 148 notice for AY 2015-16 as barred by limitation.
Mahender Kumar Jain v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 3, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices under Section 148 read with Section 153C issued beyond the prescribed limitation period computed from the date of handover of seized material are invalid, setting aside a notice issued for AY 2015-16 as barred by limitation.
Kamlesh Jain v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 3, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices under Section 148 issued beyond the prescribed limitation period computed from the date of handover of seized material are invalid, setting aside the notice for AY 2015-16 as barred by limitation.
Pankaj Jain v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 3, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices under Section 148 issued beyond the prescribed limitation period computed from the date of satisfaction and handover of seized material under Section 153C are invalid and quashed the notice issued for AY 2015-16.
Kent RO Systems Pvt Ltd & Anr v. Pushpendra Yadav & Ors
The Delhi High Court issued a corrigendum correcting a typographical error in its earlier judgment regarding the description of design features.
Kanta Devi & Anr. v. Director of Industries Govt of Orissa & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a son is not barred from compassionate appointment if the spouse does not apply, and remanded the matter for reconsideration, emphasizing the scheme's objective to alleviate financial distress.
Ranveer Singh Chauhan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the respondents complied with disability reservation orders and that the petitioner was not eligible for promotion due to insufficient service, dismissing the writ petition accordingly.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. M/S Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order exempting surplus arising from transfer of capital assets to a wholly owned subsidiary from capital gains tax under Section 47(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
OHMI INDUSTRIES ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST
The Delhi High Court held that Rule 89(4) CGST Rules applies only to zero rated supplies without payment of tax and set aside the refund rejection of integrated tax paid on export of services, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.
Union of India & Anr. v. Ranjit Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the right of a visually handicapped candidate to a second opportunity for document verification in a recruitment exercise under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, dismissing the Union of India's appeal.
GAIL (India) Limited v. Directorate General of GST Intelligence & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a garnishee order directing GAIL to pay disputed GST dues on behalf of a third party, holding that payment can only be compelled if the amount is due and payable.
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v. Vee Excel Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Private Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the validity of an old patent is not presumed and that the defendants raised a credible challenge of prior claiming and evergreening, thus denying interim injunction against manufacture and sale of Linagliptin tablets.
Ex Corporal Ranber Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with interest to an ex-Air Force employee who joined State Civil Service, in line with binding precedent.
GOYAL MG GASES PVT LTD v. PANAMA INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that dismissal of an application for impleadment of non-signatory third parties in arbitration is a procedural order, not an interim award, and non-signatories can be impleaded only in exceptional cases reflecting parties' intention.