Ms.Saahila Lamba, Adv. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....

Delhi High Court · 06 Apr 2023 · 2023:DHC:2394-DB
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT; HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Civil Appeal No.172/2023 decided on 16.01.2023 titled as “The Union of India & Ors. vs. Rajib
2023:DHC:2394-DB
administrative petition_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of BSF Nursing Assistants seeking Nursing Allowance, upholding the Supreme Court's ruling that educational qualifications and experience are valid criteria for allowance entitlement.

Full Text
Translation output
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2394-DB
W.P.(C) 832/2017
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 06.04.2023
W.P.(C) 832/2017
DALIP KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: Ms.Saahila Lamba, Adv.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Ms.Arunima Dwivedi & Ms.Amrita Prakash, CGSC with Mr.Aakash
Pathak & Ms.Pinky Pawar, Advs. for UOI.
Mr. Hemendra Singh, Dy.
Commandant (Law) BSF
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. Present petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents to grant nursing allowance to personnel holding post of Head Constable (Nursing Assistant) in Border Security Force including petitioners with effect from date other nursing staff in Border Security Force have been granted Nursing Allowance.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents has informed this Court that the issue raised in the present petition has already been decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.172/2023 decided on 16.01.2023 titled as “The Union of India & Ors. vs. Rajib Khan & Ors.” whereby observed as 11:39 Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2394-DB W.P.(C) 832/2017 under:

“5. Applying the law laid down by this Court in the aforesaid decisions to the facts of the case on hand the view taken by the High Court that the educational qualification cannot be a ground for denial of Nursing Allowance to the Nursing Assistants is unsustainable. In the present case the respective Nursing Assistants are being paid „Hospital Patient Care Allowance‟. The Nursing Assistants in the BSF neither have relevant experience for appointment as Staff Nurse nor they possess any educational qualification for appointment as Staff Nurse. Therefore, the case of Nursing Assistants cannot be compared with that of the Staff Nurses as both carry different educational qualification. Under the circumstances, the High Court has committed a serious error in holding and directing that the Nursing Assistants serving in the Assam Rifles/BSF are entitled to Nursing Allowance at par with the Staff Nurses. 6. In view of the above and for the reason stated above present appeal succeeds. The impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge as well as the Division Bench of the High Court holding and directing that the original writ petitioners – Nursing Assistants shall be entitled to Nursing Allowance at par with the Staff Nurse is hereby quashed and set aside.”

3. Thus, counsel for the respondents submits that nothing survives in the present petition.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners does not dispute the submission of counsel for the respondents.

5. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed in view of the judgment of Rajib Khan & Ors. (supra).

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA)

JUDGE APRIL 06, 2023 11:39