Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Sh. Surjeet Singh v. Dominant Systems Pvt. Limited
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, a worker not gainfully employed during pendency of proceedings is entitled to full wages, and mere assistance in family business without proof of remuneration does not defeat this right.
Shridhar Bajaj v. Gyanesh Chaudhary
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove continuous readiness and willingness, time was the essence of the contract, and the Agreement was rightly cancelled upon non-fulfillment of a condition precedent.
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. v. HORIZON BIOCEUTICALS PVT. LTD & ANR.
The Delhi High Court granted an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark COMODEX, holding it infringed the plaintiff's registered trademark COBADEX due to likelihood of confusion in pharmaceutical products.
Manish Mohan v. I.O. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case, holding that statements under section 67 NDPS Act and confessions to NCB officers are inadmissible against him and that the prosecution failed to prima facie connect him to the offence.
Dr. Yogender Kumar Puri v. NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under Sections 279, 323, 354, and 34 IPC based on a full and voluntary settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Company & Ors. v. Metrochem API Private Limited
The Delhi High Court decreed a patent infringement suit in terms of a court-mediated settlement where the defendant acknowledged patent validity, ceased infringing activities, and the parties agreed to binding terms including token costs and waiver of damages.
Monish Baweja v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court remanded the petitioner's claim for alternative allotment of a plot for fresh consideration after finding that the rejection was based on incorrect ownership information.
Mumtaz Ara v. Gauhar Hussain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a litigant declared indigent by an unchallenged order cannot be directed to pay court fees on a review application absent fresh material altering that status.
Saurabh Sabharwal v. Satish Bhatia
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s order closing the petitioner’s opportunity to record evidence due to repeated delays and non-compliance, dismissing the petition with costs.
MS. Yashtee (Minor) & Anr. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Government of NCT of Delhi to consider and dispose of the petitioners' representations for admission under the EWS/Disadvantage Group category within two weeks, upholding prior Court directions.
M/S B G SLEEPER WORKS v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging disqualification from a government tender reverse auction due to invalid Udyam registration, affirming strict compliance with MSME registration requirements under procurement policy.
PUMA SE v. BRIJENDRA SINGH TRADING AS SASTAJOOTA
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and costs to Puma SE against a defendant selling counterfeit PUMA products, holding that identical use of registered marks on identical goods presumes infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Anil Kumar Gupta v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed correction of a clerical error in the counsel's name in its earlier order and issued a corrigendum accordingly.
Kamla Gupta & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Sections 498A and related IPC provisions in a matrimonial dispute following a genuine settlement and cohabitation of the parties.
Poonam Tomar & Anr. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross-FIRs arising from neighbourly disputes under non-compoundable offences based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and promote social harmony.
Shri Bajranglal Garg v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288 and 304A IPC following an amicable settlement and full compensation paid to the deceased's family, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Rinku Kumar & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and divorce decree, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process in such cases.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -6 v. Modipon Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that interest under Section 220(2) of the Income Tax Act is payable only from the date of issuance of a demand notice under Section 156, and not from the date of the original assessment order.
Ajay Singh v. Delhi Police Public School and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an employee wrongfully removed and reinstated after quashing of illegal disciplinary proceedings is entitled to full back wages and benefits, rejecting the employer's invocation of 'no work no pay' and financial constraints.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a refund application accompanied by prescribed documents cannot be rejected as barred by limitation merely because of a Deficiency Memo, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.