Delhi High Court

63,002 judgments

Year:

M/S B G SLEEPER WORKS v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR

10 Apr 2023 · SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA; SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD · 2023:DHC:2463-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging disqualification from a government tender reverse auction due to invalid Udyam registration, affirming strict compliance with MSME registration requirements under procurement policy.

administrative petition_dismissed Udyam Registration Certificate Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 Public Procurement Policy reverse auction

PUMA SE v. BRIJENDRA SINGH TRADING AS SASTAJOOTA

10 Apr 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:7678

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and costs to Puma SE against a defendant selling counterfeit PUMA products, holding that identical use of registered marks on identical goods presumes infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off well-known mark Trade Marks Act 1999

Anil Kumar Gupta v. Union of India & Anr.

06 Apr 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:2448

The Delhi High Court allowed correction of a clerical error in the counsel's name in its earlier order and issued a corrigendum accordingly.

other other clerical error correction of order court's inherent power name correction

Kamla Gupta & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

06 Apr 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:3124

Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Sections 498A and related IPC provisions in a matrimonial dispute following a genuine settlement and cohabitation of the parties.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC amicable settlement

Poonam Tomar & Anr. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

06 Apr 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:5411

The Delhi High Court quashed cross-FIRs arising from neighbourly disputes under non-compoundable offences based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and promote social harmony.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR inherent powers amicable settlement

Shri Bajranglal Garg v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

06 Apr 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:3141

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288 and 304A IPC following an amicable settlement and full compensation paid to the deceased's family, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 288 IPC Section 304A IPC settlement agreement

Rinku Kumar & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

06 Apr 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:4794

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and divorce decree, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process in such cases.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute section 498A IPC amicable settlement

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -6 v. Modipon Ltd.

06 Apr 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2023:DHC:3678-DB

The Delhi High Court held that interest under Section 220(2) of the Income Tax Act is payable only from the date of issuance of a demand notice under Section 156, and not from the date of the original assessment order.

tax appeal_dismissed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 220(2) Section 156 interest on demand

Ajay Singh v. Delhi Police Public School and Anr.

06 Apr 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:2712

The Delhi High Court held that an employee wrongfully removed and reinstated after quashing of illegal disciplinary proceedings is entitled to full back wages and benefits, rejecting the employer's invocation of 'no work no pay' and financial constraints.

labor petition_allowed Significant no work no pay back wages wrongful termination disciplinary inquiry

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

06 Apr 2023 · Vibhu BakhrU; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:2482-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a refund application accompanied by prescribed documents cannot be rejected as barred by limitation merely because of a Deficiency Memo, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST refund Section 54 CGST Act Rule 89(2) CGST Rules Rule 90(3) CGST Rules

WINGS PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. v. GENFORD DRUGS PVT. LTD. & ORS.

06 Apr 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:2393

The Delhi High Court recorded an amicable settlement in a trademark and copyright infringement suit, decreeing the suit in terms of the parties' agreement and binding the defendants to cease infringing activities.

civil settled trademark infringement copyright infringement Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC settlement

Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Aarti Singhal

06 Apr 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:2373
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted to a woman accused in a massive corporate fraud case under the beneficial proviso of section 212(6) Companies Act, emphasizing judicial discretion and absence of supervening circumstances to cancel bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 212(6) Companies Act, 2013 Bail proviso for women Economic offences SFIO investigation

Harish Chauhan & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

06 Apr 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:2630

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following a bona fide compromise and divorce decree, emphasizing protection of minor child's rights.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Harjaspreet Singh & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

06 Apr 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:2753

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC following an amicable settlement and directed release of seized mobile phones.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Om Prakash Bhargava v. State & Ors.

06 Apr 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:2352

The Delhi High Court granted Letter of Administration to the petitioner husband as Class-I legal heir of the intestate deceased, with consent of other heirs, despite absence of documentary proof of estate title.

civil petition_allowed Letter of Administration Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276 Intestate succession

MS. ANITA SHAROHA & ANR v. BRAHAM PRAKASH SHAROHA & ORS

06 Apr 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:2486

The Delhi High Court directed the Executing Court to expeditiously decide the petitioner's application challenging the consideration of circle rates based on an unsupported handwritten application during execution proceedings.

civil other execution proceedings circle rates handwritten application affidavit

Mukund Bhatia v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors

06 Apr 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:2353

The Delhi High Court granted probate of the uncontested Will dated 15.01.2020 of Kumari Lajja Bhatia in favor of her nephew, Shri Mukund Bhatia, upon proof of due execution and attestation.

civil petition_allowed Indian Succession Act, 1925 Letters of Administration Probate of Will Will execution

Al-Ameen Hajj Group v. Union of India

06 Apr 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:2407

The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to consider the petitioner’s representation for upgradation from Category 2 to Category 1 Haj Group Organiser in accordance with the policy and prior judicial assurance.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Haj Group Organiser policy category upgradation government policy representation

Haryana Carrom Association & Ors. v. All India Carromm Federation & Ors.

06 Apr 2023 · Mukta Gupta · 2023:DHC:2391

The Delhi High Court set aside the 2018 All India Carrom Federation elections for non-compliance with Sports Code and election guidelines, holding the suit maintainable and directing fresh elections under government supervision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Sports Federation Electoral College Model Election Guidelines Power of Attorney

M/S THE COMMERICAL ELECTRIC WORKS & ORS v. SHARDA GUPTA

06 Apr 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:2386
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of tenants on the ground of bona fide need by the landlady for ground floor commercial premises, rejecting claims of suitable alternative accommodation on upper floors.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide need eviction petition