Union of India v. Kendriya Bhandhar

Delhi High Court · 16 Aug 2023 · 2023:DHC:4655-DB
Sanjeev Sachdeva; Manoj Jain
FAO (COMM) 85/2022
2023:DHC:4655-DB
other other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed correction of a typographical error in the names of counsel in its judgment dated 11.07.2023 by issuing a corrigendum reflecting the correct appearances.

Full Text
Translation output
FAO (COMM) 85/2022 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
FAO (COMM) 85/2022
UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr. Tarveen, GP.
VERSUS
KENDRIYA BHANDHAR ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Advocate (through VC).
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R 16.08.2023
CM APPL. 41794/2023(Rectification In The Name Of Counsels)
JUDGMENT

1. This is an application seeking correction of the name of the counsel in judgment dated 11.07.2023.

2. This appeal along with other connected appeals was heard on 25.05.2023 and judgment was reserved. Thereafter, by separate judgements dated 11.07.2023, all the appeals have been disposed of. It is pointed out that in the judgment dated 11.07.2023 in FAO (COMM) 85/2022, the name of counsel appearing in the connected matter has been reflected and the names of the counsel who appeared has been omitted.

3. Perusal of order dated 25.05.2023 shows the correct appearance of counsel. Accordingly, the same is a typographical error and is corrected. The FAO (COMM) 85/2022 2 names appearing in order dated 25.05.2023 i.e, Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw with Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Mr. Ashish Kumar and Ms. Mahima Misra, Advocates, shall be shown as having appeared for the respondents in this appeal.

4. The application is allowed in the above terms.

5. This order be uploaded as corrigendum to judgment dated 11.07.2023.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J MANOJ JAIN, J AUGUST 16, 2023