Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Abhishek Jain (Trading as M/s Trip Planners) v. Trip Planners Holidays Private Limited
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark dispute suit by recording a binding settlement agreement reached through court mediation, enforcing cessation of trademark use and withdrawal of conflicting applications.
Saba Azmi v. Parvez Alam @ Jolly
The Delhi High Court held that a Nikahnama obtained without the bride's consent and appearance before the Qazi is null and void, thereby invalidating the purported marriage.
Manpreet Kaur v. Pushpinder Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to recall the withdrawal of an appeal against a divorce decree, holding that cohabitation and settlement under Section 125 CrPC do not annul a divorce decree and subsequent hardship does not justify recalling the order.
Sunil Chaduhary v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the departmental chargesheet at the preliminary stage, holding that inquiry proceedings should not be interfered with before their conclusion.
R X Infotech Private Limited v. Jalpa Rajesh Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court held that it has territorial jurisdiction over a trademark infringement suit involving online sales accessible in Delhi, dismissing the defendant's application to reject the plaint for lack of jurisdiction.
Wasim Ahmad & Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Swati Sharma v. Ashwani Kumar Kansal and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that no appeal lies under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act against dismissal of a contempt petition without punishment, affirming that jurisdiction to punish for contempt arises only upon imposition of punishment.
Yuvraj Singh Puar v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the MCD’s sanction of a building plan interpreting DCR 4.4.[3] to allow larger plots to avail ground coverage and FAR of the largest lower category plot with reduced setbacks, dismissing the petitioner’s writ challenge under Article 226.
Suraj v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a commercial quantity NDPS case, emphasizing the primacy of Article 21 liberty rights and relaxing Section 37 conditions due to prolonged pre-trial incarceration.
Abhishek Kumar & Ors. v. The Secretary Dental Council of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Regulation 11 of the Dental Council of India Screening Test Regulations, 2009, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to the viva-voce qualifying criteria as a valid expert measure not violative of constitutional rights.
Naresh Kumar Mittal & Ors. v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR registered by CBI for bank fraud due to violation of a prior stay order and non-compliance with mandatory sanction provisions under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Vikender Singh Yadav v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a CISF Sub Inspector accused under Section 354 IPC and POCSO Act, imposing conditions including relocation beyond 5 km from the minor victim’s residence.
M/s Acme Resources Ltd. v. Hotel Royal Plaza & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a winding up petition against a company due to a bona fide dispute over the debt and a pending civil suit, reaffirming that winding up cannot be used to enforce disputed debts.
Deepak and Others v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled and obtained a mutual divorce decree, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
HERITAGE HOLIDAYS PVT LTD. v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 10 1 DELHI
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, holding that the Assessing Officer must be allowed to inquire into disputed property sale valuations and possession transfers, with procedural compliance ensured.
Atlantech Online Services Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Google India Pvt Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the time limit for filing replication under Rule 5 of the Original Side Rules is mandatory and cannot be extended beyond 45 days, dismissing the plaintiffs' application for condonation of delay.
M/S TIRUPATI CYLINDERS LTD. v. M/S J.V.G. FINANCE LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed TCL's appeal, holding that fraudulent and unauthorized transactions involving JVG Group companies' assets during winding up proceedings cannot confer title, affirming the lifting of the corporate veil and rejecting TCL's claim to certain lands.
Shiv Ganga Udyog v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration and rejection of revocation application due to lack of specific reasons and procedural infirmities, directing restoration of registration.
Tarika v. Ashwani Kumar Kansal
The Delhi High Court held that no appeal lies under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act against dismissal of a contempt petition without punishment, affirming that jurisdiction to punish for contempt arises only upon imposition of punishment.
Abhishek Grover v. Inderjeet Grover
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing the written statement in a possession suit, emphasizing adjudication on merits subject to costs and strict conditions.