Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
Shukni Devi & Ors. v. Jaipal Chand & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Tribunal's award determining the deceased's income based on Bihar minimum wages due to lack of cogent evidence proving employment in Delhi, while condoning the delay in filing the appeal.
Mohd. Iqbal v. BSES Yamuna Power Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction under Section 135 Indian Evidence Act after the parties amicably settled the dispute through mediation.
Shyama Devi & Ors. v. NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the complainant's death and amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Commissioner Transport Department v. Gaurav Enterprises
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the arbitral award's interest rate of 12% per annum, holding the rate was within the Arbitrator's discretion and not liable to be set aside.
State v. Sushil @ Ekka and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's Criminal Leave Petition upholding the acquittal of accused in a gang rape and kidnapping case due to inconsistencies in the victim's testimony and lack of corroborative evidence.
Narendra Kumar v. M S OM Daily Needs Retailing Pvt Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a civil suit filed without complying with the procedural requirements of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 cannot be transferred to a Commercial Court and rightly returned the plaint under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.
Sh Vanshaj Sharma & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Surendra Sharma & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Varun Bhatia v. State
Delhi High Court set aside charges under Section 509 IPC against petitioner, holding that the use of the words 'Gandi Aurat' without intent to outrage modesty does not prima facie constitute an offence.
Varun Bhatia v. State and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed charges under Section 509 IPC against the petitioner, holding that the use of the words 'Gandi Aurat' without indecent intent does not prima facie outrage a woman's modesty.
Deepika v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the termination of a CISF trainee on medical grounds, holding that termination during training must be based on consistent medical evidence and directed reinstatement with back wages.
C.B.I. v. Shyamal Ghosh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court expunged disparaging remarks against the CBI in a discharge order for lack of opportunity of hearing and emphasized judicial restraint in criticizing investigating agencies.
Sunil Yadav v. State, NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the trial court's refusal to recall the victim for cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C., holding that no gross error or miscarriage of justice was shown to warrant interference.
Durgesh Kumar v. The State and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Sunil Kumar & Ors. v. State Govt. NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Prahalad Dutta Lata v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s liability as guarantor was limited to ₹1.2 crore plus interest and remanded the matter to the DRT to quantify the exact amount payable.
Amardeep Singh v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a fraud FIR under Sections 420/34 IPC as an abuse of process, affirming that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. must be exercised sparingly and not to circumvent prior judicial orders.
Anzara Alies Bhola & Anr. v. The State of GNCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from a neighborly dispute under its inherent powers after the parties amicably settled and the complainant withdrew the complaint.
Kesh Ram Meena & Anr. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 after the parties amicably settled the dispute and cleared civil liabilities.
M/S CROCS INC USA v. M/S RELAXO FOOTWEAR LTD
The Delhi High Court disposed of suits for infringement of a cancelled design registration as not surviving, reserving liberty to plaintiffs to pursue remedies if their appeal against cancellation succeeds.