Delhi High Court
31,999 judgments
Sunil Yadav v. State, NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the trial court's refusal to recall the victim for cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C., holding that no gross error or miscarriage of justice was shown to warrant interference.
Durgesh Kumar v. The State and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Sunil Kumar & Ors. v. State Govt. NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Prahalad Dutta Lata v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s liability as guarantor was limited to ₹1.2 crore plus interest and remanded the matter to the DRT to quantify the exact amount payable.
Amardeep Singh v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a fraud FIR under Sections 420/34 IPC as an abuse of process, affirming that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. must be exercised sparingly and not to circumvent prior judicial orders.
Anzara Alies Bhola & Anr. v. The State of GNCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from a neighborly dispute under its inherent powers after the parties amicably settled and the complainant withdrew the complaint.
Kesh Ram Meena & Anr. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 after the parties amicably settled the dispute and cleared civil liabilities.
M/S CROCS INC USA v. M/S RELAXO FOOTWEAR LTD
The Delhi High Court disposed of suits for infringement of a cancelled design registration as not surviving, reserving liberty to plaintiffs to pursue remedies if their appeal against cancellation succeeds.
M/S BCC-MONALISHA (JV) v. CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitral tribunal, holding that the petitioner failed to comply with mandatory pre-arbitral conditions and raised claims exceeding the contractual threshold, rendering the disputes non-arbitrable.
Atlas Global Technologies LLC v. TP Link Technologies Co Ltd & Ors.
Delhi High Court directs implementer-defendants to deposit pro-tem security during ongoing FRAND licensing negotiations for Wi-Fi 6 SEPs to prevent unfair advantage and preserve Plaintiff's patent rights.
State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) v. Deelip Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused, emphasizing the fortified presumption of innocence after acquittal and the insufficiency of prosecution evidence to justify conviction.
BIRMAJI & ORS. v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 341, 323, 324, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties under its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
KS Commodities Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Division Connaught Place CGST South
Delhi High Court set aside rejection of GST Input Tax Credit refund claim for export of sugar and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of evidence by the Appellate Authority.
Pradyumn Ahuja v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a person facing a pending criminal case is entitled to a ten-year passport renewal subject to court permission for travel, affirming the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
HDFC ERGO GENERAL INS. CO. LTD. v. SMT. SHUKNI DEVI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by reducing future prospects to 25% and held the insurer entitled to recover compensation from the unlicensed driver.
Manish & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce decree, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Uppal Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Jag Parvesh Sura
The Delhi High Court upheld the Sole Arbitrator's order dismissing the petitioner's Section 16 application, confirming that a sole proprietorship is not a separate legal entity and that limitation issues need not be decided at the preliminary stage in arbitration.
Dhairya Kumar Jindal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the counselling procedure allowing automatic carry forward of choices in second round admissions, dismissing the petition challenging its legality as neither arbitrary nor illegal.
Director General of Foreign Trade v. Horizon Aerospace (India) Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of an exporter to MEIS benefits despite intermediary warehousing in an FTWZ, emphasizing the principal export transaction and trade facilitation policy.
Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd v. Lifestyle Equities C V
The Delhi High Court set aside an interim injunction restraining use of a polo player device logo, holding that the composite marks are not deceptively similar when viewed as a whole.