Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
KRISHANPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Mr. Varun Singh, Ms. Kajal Gupta, Ms. Smriti Wadhwa and Ms. Somesa Gupta, Advocates.
For the Respondents : Ms. Tajinder Virdi, Standing Counsel for R-1 & R-
2/MCD (through video-conferencing).
Mr. Divyam Nandrajog, Panel Counsel, GNCTD along with Mr. Mayank Kamra, Advocate for R-3/SHO, P.S.:
South Shahdara Zone.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
1. The present writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, has been instituted on behalf of the petitioner, praying as follows:- “It is, therefore, most respectfully and humbly prayed from this Hon’ble Court that this Writ Petition may please be allowed. It is further prayed that this Hon’ble Court may:a. Issue appropriate writ, order and/ or direction against the Respondent No. 1 & 3 for abusing his power and prohibiting Respondent No. 1 & 3 from continuously harassing the Petitioner. b. Issue appropriate writ, order and/ or direction allowing the Petitioner to carry of the business as Street Vendor peacefully and in accordance with his Certificate of Vending, without any illegal interference from the Respondent authorities. c. Any other order which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed.”
2. Issue notice.
3. Ms. Tajinder Virdi, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2/MCD and Mr. Divyam Nandrajog, learned Panel Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent NO. 3/SHO, P.S.: South Shahdara Zone.
4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the MCD, has invited our attention to the terms and conditions, permitting the petitioners to vend.
5. For the sake of completeness, the said terms and conditions attached to the Certificate of Vending, are reproduced herein below:-
6. In terms of the Certificate of Vending issued to the petitioner, it is clearly stipulated that he cannot vend from any particular location, contrary to the express terms of Clause no. ‘11’, of the said Certificate of Vending. It is further observed that since the Town Vending Committee (TVC) is yet to fix a time limit, providing for a period, during which a vendor can vend from any particular spot, the stipulation of 30 minutes time, contained in the said clause, is binding on the petitioner, at this stage. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that, he does not pray for the relief of running his business from any particular vending site, within the zone where he has been permitted to vend by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi.
7. It is an admitted position that the Town Vending Committee (TVC), has in terms of the directions issued by this Court, from time to time, as well as, in terms of the mandate of Section 3 (Survey of street vendors and protection from eviction on relocation) and Section 4 (Issue of certificate of vending) of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, carried out a survey, in some of the areas under the MCD zone; pursuant to which, the petitioner, namely, Mr. Krishanpal Singh, has been issued certificate of vending dated 24.11.2021, which is annexed as Annexure P-2, to the present writ petition.
8. In view of the foregoing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, categorically limits the relief in the present writ petition, i.e. to a direction to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, to permit Mr. Krishanpal Singh, to continue to vend within Shahdara South Zone, Ward-18E, URI: 7737582, strictly and scrupulously in compliance with the terms and conditions of the said certificate of vending, particularly Clause no. 11, and in accordance with law.
9. In view of the above, the present writ petition is partly allowed; and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi is directed to permit Mr. Krishanpal Singh, to vend within Shahdara South Zone, Ward-18E, subject to the terms and conditions of the aforementioned certificate of vending dated 24.11.2021, without any let or hindrance.
10. No further directions are prayed for.
11. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly. The pending applications also stand disposed of.
12. A copy of this judgment be uploaded on the website of this Court forthwith.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL (JUDGE)
ANISH DAYAL (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 06, 2023 Click here to check corrigendum, if any